Originally posted by strickac:
I definitely feel #2 is way too early for him. It's debatable whether he's better than Davis and neither have that top-5 vibe coming out. It wouldn't surprise anyone if a WR wasn't taken in the top-10.
Yeah, as fans, we're absolutely obsessed with "value." Unfortunately, we picked the worst year ever to achieve value UNLESS we happen to get a huge trade-back deal.
But either way, our FO won't give a s**t if they get their player.
Barnett might be #1 on Saleh's board for the Elephant. Williams may be #1 on LaFleur's board. Trubisky might be #1 on Shanahan's board. Hooker, for Lynch.
The truth is, any one of these players completes an entire position group so "forget about draft value."
The
value
in adding Barnett is it's the most important position (Elephant) on defense and helps complete the DL. Does it matter if we get him at #2 vs. #15? The value in adding Williams is that it completes your WR group and affords everyone to play to their strengths (i.e. Garcon at the X; Williams at the Z and Kerley at the Y). The value in adding Trubisky is that Kyle's got his QB to develop over the next two years at THE most important position (WCO) on the team. Hooker completes the secondary fully and is the second most important position in our 4-3_under defense. Foster completes your ILB unit (once he's healthy).
[ Edited by NCommand on Apr 19, 2017 at 7:54 AM ]
There are a plethora of franchise QBs in this draft.