There are 338 users in the forums
Mike Williams (WR Clemson)
Browse 49ers books and videos
Nov 12, 2016 at 2:48 PM
- Tman
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,798
Yea he is a good one
Nov 12, 2016 at 3:45 PM
- Zachary13White
- Veteran
- Posts: 521
Garoppalo to Williams for6!?!?
Nov 12, 2016 at 4:40 PM
- Butter
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,484
Consider what Hopkins looks like with a sub par QB this year. I'm not saying pass on Williams, but if they can't find a legit QB, he may not do much initially
Nov 12, 2016 at 4:41 PM
- 9moon
- Veteran
- Posts: 22,234
MEGATRON II ???
Nov 12, 2016 at 5:03 PM
- HERN
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,446
Courtland Sutton > Mike Williams
When the smoke clears, he'll be best WR prospect by draft day.
When the smoke clears, he'll be best WR prospect by draft day.
Nov 12, 2016 at 5:09 PM
- eastcoast49ersfan
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,112
Originally posted by HERN:
Courtland Sutton > Mike Williams
When the smoke clears, he'll be best WR prospect by draft day.
And neither one will be worth the #2 overall pick.
Nov 12, 2016 at 5:17 PM
- HERN
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,446
Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:Originally posted by HERN:Courtland Sutton > Mike Williams
When the smoke clears, he'll be best WR prospect by draft day.
And neither one will be worth the #2 overall pick.
That's for Sure.
Garrett and Allen might be the only ones worthy of #2.
Still debating on Peppers.
Nov 12, 2016 at 5:24 PM
- bors
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,736
Trade back for a extra 2nd. Get mike. Deal 2 nd fro grop
Nov 12, 2016 at 6:03 PM
- NorthWest9Er
- Veteran
- Posts: 448
If garrett isn't there I say we go WR.
Nov 12, 2016 at 10:33 PM
- doc_brown_
- Veteran
- Posts: 731
Originally posted by Butter:
Consider what Hopkins looks like with a sub par QB this year. I'm not saying pass on Williams, but if they can't find a legit QB, he may not do much initially
Hypothetically, I'd take Hopkins with the #2 pick.
Nov 16, 2016 at 2:42 PM
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 118,999
Originally posted by NorthWest9Er:If garrett isn't there I say we go WR.
You want to go WR at two overall? WTF...we could have Calvin on our team and we'd still be losing.
Nov 16, 2016 at 2:51 PM
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 118,999
Originally posted by doc_brown_:Originally posted by Butter:Consider what Hopkins looks like with a sub par QB this year. I'm not saying pass on Williams, but if they can't find a legit QB, he may not do much initially
Hypothetically, I'd take Hopkins with the #2 pick.
And we'd still be losing lol WR is so dependent on the qb position...
Nov 16, 2016 at 2:58 PM
- eastcoast49ersfan
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,112
Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by NorthWest9Er:If garrett isn't there I say we go WR.
You want to go WR at two overall? WTF...we could have Calvin on our team and we'd still be losing.
We could have JJ Watt or Andrew Luck on the team and we'd still be losing. I'd still take them at 2.
That said, Mike Williams is not the same player Calvin Johnson was in college and I think we'll have better options.
Nov 16, 2016 at 3:13 PM
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 118,999
Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:We could have JJ Watt or Andrew Luck on the team and we'd still be losing. I'd still take them at 2.
That said, Mike Williams is not the same player Calvin Johnson was in college and I think we'll have better options.
Correct I don't think we'd be losing with luck though. WR is one of the most dependent positions in football...I can't think of too many pro bowl type WRs that didn't have a solid qb throwing them the ball.
And yes I agree he's not CJ type of player and that is the type of WR you draft that high.
Personally I'd rather go the FA route for a WR and draft one a little later.