RONNIE STANLEY | Page 5 | 49ers Webzone Forum

Brando85 · 2015-11-18T08:04:11-08:00

I was curious if other zoners were as high on this kid as I was? Spending last two seasons on the left side, he also has experience at RT having started there during his sophomore season. I actually just came across a mock that has hime pegged to us: www.latestmock.com RONNIE STANLEY, NOTRE DAME - LT 6'6, 315 LBS Three year starter with versatility and insane length. Feel like he'll be a top 10 guy.

Apr 14, 2016 at 9:10 AM

#61

evil
Veteran
Posts: 46,699

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by KRS-1:
Well, Stanley may be firmly in the convo now at 7, all dependent on how the board unfolds obviously. Day 1 starter at RT, the future at LT and quite possibly see ya later AD if it happened.

They might be content with Brown at RT

Perhaps but if they are not Stanley fits the O like a glove and has a higher ceiling than Brown by a country mile.

Apr 14, 2016 at 9:13 AM

#62

frankieuc68
Veteran
Posts: 5,750

Looking at the big picture, I would be on board for him. Plug in RT and future LT once Staley is done. A bit better pass blocker than Tunsil on a draft that is deep of 3-4 DE.. well sign me up. Unless, Buckner is sitting at our pick.

Apr 14, 2016 at 9:14 AM

#63

Tru2RedNGold25
Veteran
Posts: 8,023

I rather have Stanley over Bosa. Something about that dude that just doesn't do it for me. If these 2 are our last options at #7 take Stanley please!!!!

Apr 14, 2016 at 9:23 AM

#64

Joecool
Veteran
Posts: 70,984

I think we should go OL if Ronnie is there. Good OL are not easy to get and this automatically puts our OL, which is our biggest weakness into a strength.

Getting a defensive player does not turn our defense into a strength. It is much easier to grab defensive players in the draft than it is OL.

Let's solidify that OL and let Hyde run loose!!!!!!!!!

Apr 14, 2016 at 9:32 AM

#65

frankieuc68
Veteran
Posts: 5,750

Get Stanley at first, top DE (Butler,Jones or Kaufasi)in 2nd in a deep DE crop, OG Westerman at 3rd.. best available the rest.. many good players that Baalke needs to hit this time.

Apr 14, 2016 at 9:34 AM

#66

susweel
Hall of Nepal
Posts: 122,000

Tunsil or Stanley are my picks. Fix the Oline and get the QB next year.

Apr 14, 2016 at 9:35 AM

#67

Heroism
Veteran
Posts: 26,174

No dog in him. Plays passive. No thanks.

Apr 14, 2016 at 9:50 AM

#68

frankieuc68
Veteran
Posts: 5,750

Not a sexy pick, but an important piece not only this year but for the next 10 years. A bona-fide true LT that has great techniques that is a great value at 7 at a position of need. What's not to like? He doesn't have Tunsil's "dogness" but I see enough.

Apr 14, 2016 at 9:59 AM

#69

JustinNiner
Veteran
Posts: 6,762

Originally posted by susweel:
Tunsil or Stanley are my picks. Fix the Oline and get the QB next year.

Arent there not alot of good Qbs next year?

I say we grab wildcard in the mid round like Prescott, Hogan, Adams, or Hackenberg.

We play Gabbert next year and see how the wildcard develops.

If the wildcard doesnt work out we wait til Garrett and Rosen come out in 2018. These guys seem like the real deal

Apr 14, 2016 at 10:08 AM

#70

evil
Veteran
Posts: 46,699

Originally posted by JustinNiner:

Originally posted by susweel:
Tunsil or Stanley are my picks. Fix the Oline and get the QB next year.

Arent there not alot of good Qbs next year?

I say we grab wildcard in the mid round like Prescott, Hogan, Adams, or Hackenberg.

We play Gabbert next year and see how the wildcard develops.

If the wildcard doesnt work out we wait til Garrett and Rosen come out in 2018. These guys seem like the real deal

Mid rounder does not mean we cannot take a QB high next year. We'll have had a year to assess how we feel about him and his chances going forward.

Apr 14, 2016 at 10:14 AM

#71

susweel
Hall of Nepal
Posts: 122,000

Originally posted by JustinNiner:

Originally posted by susweel:
Tunsil or Stanley are my picks. Fix the Oline and get the QB next year.

Arent there not alot of good Qbs next year?

I say we grab wildcard in the mid round like Prescott, Hogan, Adams, or Hackenberg.

We play Gabbert next year and see how the wildcard develops.

If the wildcard doesnt work out we wait til Garrett and Rosen come out in 2018. These guys seem like the real deal

You pretty much have to take a mid rounder just fill out the roster. My belief is you should take a QB every other year to have someone always developing.

Apr 14, 2016 at 10:30 AM

#72

Since07
Veteran
Posts: 4,983

My bro would always tell me that you draft positions in the 1st round that are a rarity in the NFL RT would be one of those positions

Apr 14, 2016 at 10:54 AM

#73

susweel
Hall of Nepal
Posts: 122,000

Originally posted by Since07:
My bro would always tell me that you draft positions in the 1st round that are a rarity in the NFL RT would be one of those positions

Thats an outdated way of thinking modern passing league has made both Tackle positions just as valuable. They also use to say the same thing about Guards but you see more and more Guards going in the 1st round.

Apr 14, 2016 at 11:09 AM

#74

NYniner85
Veteran
Posts: 118,770

There not spending a top 7 pick on a RT...if that's the case trade down and grab decker, Conklin, spriggs etc....how about they take some of the new Titan picks and move down to 15??

Apr 14, 2016 at 12:01 PM

#75

evil
Veteran
Posts: 46,699

Originally posted by NYniner85:
There not spending a top 7 pick on a RT...if that's the case trade down and grab decker, Conklin, spriggs etc....how about they take some of the new Titan picks and move down to 15??

Would be the heir to Staley. I would not count Stanley out of the convo at 7 now.