Originally posted by Kolohe:
I'd take a 6th round pick and be done with it.
I don't think they have a 6th. ,
Originally posted by Kolohe:
I'd take a 6th round pick and be done with it.
There are 513 users in the forums
If Chicago agrees to a draft day trade of Gould, what wud you take in compensation?
Apr 23, 2019 at 5:20 PM
- toppdogg32
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,796
I don't think they have a 6th. ,
The above videos are auto-populated by an affiliate.
Apr 24, 2019 at 6:57 AM
- Since07
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,965
4th even though he's only worth a 6th who do we have behind him?
Apr 24, 2019 at 8:52 AM
- Ensatsu
- Veteran
- Posts: 9,408
take their 3rd round pick this year
Apr 24, 2019 at 9:19 AM
- TheXFactor
- Veteran
- Posts: 25,990
Originally posted by bors:
Trade him somewhere terrible
send him to Buffalo, where all kickers go to die!
Apr 24, 2019 at 9:20 AM
- GoreGoreGore
- 10HourChicken
- Posts: 61,291
No team is going to give up more than a 6th for an old kicker.
Apr 24, 2019 at 9:41 AM
- KittleMeThis
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,191
Member Milestone:
This is post number 300 for KittleMeThis.
i say a 4th or 5th is fair
Apr 24, 2019 at 9:44 AM
- frankieuc68
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,713
5th works
Apr 24, 2019 at 11:49 AM
- linkboy
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,165
I'd trade him to Minnesota
It's indoors, close to Chicago, they need a kicker and it screws the Bears over.
It's indoors, close to Chicago, they need a kicker and it screws the Bears over.
Apr 24, 2019 at 1:16 PM
- jcs
- Veteran
- Posts: 39,829
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
I'd take a 6th round pick and be done with it.
We cannot set that standard.
A 3rd-4th round pick is the lowest I would go. We could see them in the playoffs so why would we gift them a key piece to their puzzle?
It would probably more advantageous for us to keep him and sign Matt Bryant than let Gould go to the bears in terms of the standard we would set for others.
You're not getting more than a 6th...maybe a 5th next year. It's a Kicker and they already have one signed.
Apr 24, 2019 at 1:18 PM
- Waterbear
- Veteran
- Posts: 18,527
Originally posted by jcs:Originally posted by Waterbear:Originally posted by Kolohe:I'd take a 6th round pick and be done with it.
We cannot set that standard.
A 3rd-4th round pick is the lowest I would go. We could see them in the playoffs so why would we gift them a key piece to their puzzle?
It would probably more advantageous for us to keep him and sign Matt Bryant than let Gould go to the bears in terms of the standard we would set for others.
You're not getting more than a 6th...maybe a 5th next year. It's a Kicker and they already have one signed.
If that's the case then don't trade him at all.
Apr 24, 2019 at 1:35 PM
- Youngone
- Veteran
- Posts: 27,476
Tucker just set the bar for kickers
Apr 24, 2019 at 1:38 PM
- Heroism
- Veteran
- Posts: 26,164
What's preventing Gould from retiring if he doesn't get traded to a place he wants to be? Dude is old and more concerned about being with his family than anything else.
Apr 24, 2019 at 1:40 PM
- jcs
- Veteran
- Posts: 39,829
Originally posted by Heroism:
What's preventing Gould from retiring if he doesn't get traded to a place he wants to be? Dude is old and more concerned about being with his family than anything else.
Very Possible.
Apr 24, 2019 at 1:50 PM
- Overkill
- Moderator
- Posts: 11,775
Scobee was traded for a 6th round pick last year, so the market for Gould has to be higher than that. I doubt a 3rd is in the cards, though.
I'd say a 4th or something equivalent (5th plus something else).
I'd say a 4th or something equivalent (5th plus something else).
Apr 24, 2019 at 1:50 PM
- toppdogg32
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,796
Originally posted by linkboy:
I'd trade him to Minnesota
It's indoors, close to Chicago, they need a kicker and it screws the Bears over.
Trifecta!!!! Cud do this one!!