2012-13 Golden State Warriors Thread.

Originally posted by DaDDieO:

Originally posted by SF69ers:

Originally posted by DaDDieO:
He gets NO leash at all, unless he gets hot. It seemed as if he got lost in the flow of the offense last night. Klay shot 21x. Barnes should get a few of those looks.

I think it's funny that Jackson let Klay go through the growing pains last year as a rookie, gave him all the opportunity in the world to show that he can compete in the NBA, yet, he can't do the same for Harrison Barnes, who IMO is a MUCH BETTER prospect.

Why is that? Oh, because he can GET TO THE RIM OFF THE DRIBBLE???? Klay kills me sometimes. Make no mistake, he's a dead-eye shooter when he's on. But needs to find ways to get to the FT line when he's not. A lil more clever. A lot tougher.

Originally posted by OregonDuckNiner:
Apparently we're interested in Eric Gordon from NO.

Here's the link.

Part of me is intrigued, but I'd also be a little hesitant to have our starting backcourt consist of injury prone players.

However, like the author wrote, I'd be willing to deal Klay + Green + Andris for Gordon. I love Klay and, if I had to put money on it, I think he'll turn out to be a very solid player. However, he's been such a one dimensional player this year and has been very hard to watch.

Thoughts?

Originally posted by pdizo916:

Originally posted by OregonDuckNiner:

Apparently we're interested in Eric Gordon from NO.

Here's the link.

Part of me is intrigued, but I'd also be a little hesitant to have our starting backcourt consist of injury prone players.

However, like the author wrote, I'd be willing to deal Klay + Green + Andris for Gordon. I love Klay and, if I had to put money on it, I think he'll turn out to be a very solid player. However, he's been such a one dimensional player this year and has been very hard to watch.

Thoughts?

Isn't EG an undersized 2 guard that is also a chucker? Is this the final piece to a championship team?

Originally posted by SF69ers:

Fuuuu that, don't do the trade!!

Curry and Klay are still developing. I understand that Klay has been frustrating SOMETIMES, but it's not like he's been awful. Dude is in his 2nd yr and still progressing.

Originally posted by OregonDuckNiner:
Apparently we're interested in Eric Gordon from NO.

Here's the link.

Part of me is intrigued, but I'd also be a little hesitant to have our starting backcourt consist of injury prone players.

However, like the author wrote, I'd be willing to deal Klay + Green + Andris for Gordon. I love Klay and, if I had to put money on it, I think he'll turn out to be a very solid player. However, he's been such a one dimensional player this year and has been very hard to watch.

Thoughts?

Originally posted by YungAce:

Originally posted by SF69ers:
Fuuuu that, don't do the trade!!

Curry and Klay are still developing. I understand that Klay has been frustrating SOMETIMES, but it's not like he's been awful. Dude is in his 2nd yr and still progressing.

I'm more worried about Gordon going down and us basically trading Klay & Draymond for nothing. I would be a little nervous having Curry, Gordon, and Bogut in a starting rotation. We're a risking boom or bust season year in and year out.

This is another Bogut like trade. When Gordon's healthy, this trade isn't even close. We would probably have to throw in Barnes to sweeten the deal.

Originally posted by InconvenienTTruth21:

Originally posted by OregonDuckNiner:

Apparently we're interested in Eric Gordon from NO.

Here's the link.

Part of me is intrigued, but I'd also be a little hesitant to have our starting backcourt consist of injury prone players.

However, like the author wrote, I'd be willing to deal Klay + Green + Andris for Gordon. I love Klay and, if I had to put money on it, I think he'll turn out to be a very solid player. However, he's been such a one dimensional player this year and has been very hard to watch.

Thoughts?

Do not want
Hornets just signed him to a 4 year $58 mill contract, and he's always hurt.

That was just bleacher report (no offense) so I doubt anything happens. I wouldn't think the Hornets would trade him this early either after signing him to a big contract like they just did. I doubt he gets traded already

Originally posted by Method:
No, we wouldn't give up Barnes and Klay. Per the article, it would be one or the other, and that author wanted Klay because he fits better with N.O. In that case, I'd do the trade 100 times out of 100. Gordon's potential >>>>>>>>> klay at any time or date.