Originally posted by crzy:
Originally posted by strickac:
Originally posted by crzy:
A driver is not an athlete. I don't care what Nascar fans say.
Exactly! There is no athleticism required in driving a car.
I think of Lance Armstrong when this comes up. I can recall him saying that he can't throw or catch a ball. He made it sound like he is very uncoordinated. Riding a bike at his level requires incredible endurance, not athleticism. Drivers, bikers, hunters, etc, are great sportsman, but not athletes.
Ugh, Lance Armstrong is definitely 100% an athlete.
What he does requires a ridiculous amount of physical exertion, strength, endurance, lung capacity.
The Tour de France is over 2000 miles long. The Tour de France is probably more challenging than any physical activity that Lebron James or Patrick Willis will EVER endure in their lifetimes.
Jimmy Johnson sits on a car seat and turns a wheel to the right or left for a couple hours. I don't care if the car is going really fast. The guy sits down and turns a steering wheel. He is not an athlete.
I hear your argument, but neither require any athleticism and BOTH are very physically demanding. NASCAR doesn't require muscle excertion, but it take it's toll on your body. A driver looses, on average, 5-10lbs of sweat and may pull up to 3 Gs. That's pretty intense and requires an insane amount of focus and endurance.
As for cyclists, I liken them to a sprinter or long-distance runner. I have a lot of respect for what they do and the training that it requires, but I just don't think they fit my definition of what it takes to be "athlete of the year". To me, Anderson Silva is much more deserving than someone like Armstrong, Bolt, Tiger, Jeter, and others that were considered. I think Chris Johnson has significantly more athleticism than any of those guys.
IMO, it should be for someone that shows extradinary athleticism in dominating his/her sport.