There are 98 users in the forums
by bravehoptoad :: Tue, 10/09/2012 - 8:45pm
Also they're missing Colin Jones, another special-teams ace, and they released Rock Cartwright, a guy brought in primarily for his special-teams ability.
In their place, the 9ers have a slew of skill-position players who make no contribution to special teams whatsoever.
In short, they seem to have redirected a lot of resources from special teams to offense. I'm wondering if they didn't make a conscious investment in special teams last year because it's a cheap and easy way to improve one of your units without needing an entire off season to install. Now that the team has a year of familiarity with their complex offense, and an entire off season, I'm thinking offense would be a more attractive investment.
So, "reversion" on special teams might be something they've consciously done to some extent. I'm wondering if some of the volatility of year-on-year special-teams performance is because it's rare for special teams units to remain constant. They are usually stocked with bottom-of-the-roster guys, after all.
At any rate, this site certainly was not the only advanced-statistics site predicting regression for the 9ers for all the same reasons.
Originally posted by ChazBoner:
costanzo and jones were our biggest losses this offseason, no question.
This I think if they kept either one they would have been fine. But I would guess every STs tackle one if not both of them were in on it.Originally posted by ChazBoner:costanzo and jones were our biggest losses this offseason, no question.
Originally posted by fastforward:
Originally posted by ChazBoner:
costanzo and jones were our biggest losses this offseason, no question.
Why did the 49ers trade Colin Jones for a mere 7th round (practically a camp fodder) pick?
Originally posted by ChazBoner:
no idea. Doesn't make sense. Jones was always one of the first ones to make contact on kick offs.