SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS VS SEATTLE SEAHAWKS GAMEDAY THREAD (Week 6)

Originally posted by dugo:
Anything on Gore yet? Gore put the team on his back..and ppl say he's lost a step..

Originally posted by MrTruth:

Originally posted by DirtyP:
2. The passing game had no rythm to disrupt.
3. How does CK running with the ball disrupt the passing game?

AS march the offense to the red zone, inserting CK for that 1 snap stop the rhythm of the drive and mess with AS's head, furthermore CK took a huge hit as the backup and 1 yd loss and a waste of down since everyone has tape on his limited plays. CK is useless and a waste of time.

Originally posted by qnnhan7:
Ginn just showed me in this game that we missed his speed on the return game. He has a few very good return for us in this game when he got some blocking in front of him. His speed is just unmatched. His running around wasting time before he decides to take a lane still pisses me off.

But very glad Teddy is back on the return

Originally posted by MrTruth:

Originally posted by DirtyP:
2. The passing game had no rythm to disrupt.
3. How does CK running with the ball disrupt the passing game?

AS march the offense to the red zone, inserting CK for that 1 snap stop the rhythm of the drive and mess with AS's head, furthermore CK took a huge hit as the backup and 1 yd loss and a waste of down since everyone has tape on his limited plays. CK is useless and a waste of time.

Originally posted by mug0mug:
People went crazy on the "Randy Moss was wide open," play where Alex threw the pick (even Gore was pointing!) after Mayock went so heavy on it, but every angle I've looked at he was under duress, had no window, and there was no easy pass to him. I'd have preferred he just throw it away, run, or take a sack, but he was trying to be aggressive rather than passive, a criticism people constantly pepper him with.

Originally posted by DirtyP:

Originally posted by MrTruth:

CK was awesome if you consider getting your head knock off and disrupting the rhythm of the offense a food thing

1. No one mentioned CK

2. The passing game had no rythm to disrupt.

3. How does CK running with the ball disrupt the passing game?

Originally posted by SnakePlissken:

Originally posted by dugo:
Anything on Gore yet? Gore put the team on his back..and ppl say he's lost a step..

Bruised ribs/back, nothing 10 days won't help fix.

Originally posted by vaden:

Originally posted by mug0mug:
People went crazy on the "Randy Moss was wide open," play where Alex threw the pick (even Gore was pointing!) after Mayock went so heavy on it, but every angle I've looked at he was under duress, had no window, and there was no easy pass to him. I'd have preferred he just throw it away, run, or take a sack, but he was trying to be aggressive rather than passive, a criticism people constantly pepper him with.

Don't know what happened to Mayock, have always thought he's a good analyst, for but whatever reason he was awful in this game. Maybe that's just my bias, but he's lost a lot of credibility with me.

Originally posted by MrTruth:

Originally posted by pitseleh:

I agree with relying on Smith to pass has not produced, but Smith's first two games were great as we did not abandon the run game. We somehow forced ourselves to be one dimensional in the two losses. I say we forced ourselves because we came out passing, they took the lead, and then we had to rely on the passing game when we were behind. We play the best when we come out running and able to stay 2 dimensional. He doesnt need everything to be perfect but needs the D to stay honest to both parts of the offense

Rely on AS to pass makes the offense 1 dimensional and that's what the AS critics want. They want him to fail. Running the ball only balance the offense out and keep the defense honest and defending the run and the pass. Inserting CK does nothing now, cause every team has tape on him and it disruption AS and the offense.

Originally posted by qnnhan7:

Originally posted by MrTruth:

Originally posted by DirtyP:
2. The passing game had no rythm to disrupt.
3. How does CK running with the ball disrupt the passing game?

AS march the offense to the red zone, inserting CK for that 1 snap stop the rhythm of the drive and mess with AS's head, furthermore CK took a huge hit as the backup and 1 yd loss and a waste of down since everyone has tape on his limited plays. CK is useless and a waste of time.

I'm starting to hate that sh*t. Because the play doesn't work. Hasn't worked in 3 games now -- the Bills, Giants, and Seattle. It's just a wasted down in the redzone.

Originally posted by pliny:
Great hard-fought game tonight Niner fans. We'll get ya up north in December!!

Originally posted by pitseleh:

Originally posted by qnnhan7:

Originally posted by MrTruth:

Originally posted by DirtyP:
2. The passing game had no rythm to disrupt.
3. How does CK running with the ball disrupt the passing game?

AS march the offense to the red zone, inserting CK for that 1 snap stop the rhythm of the drive and mess with AS's head, furthermore CK took a huge hit as the backup and 1 yd loss and a waste of down since everyone has tape on his limited plays. CK is useless and a waste of time.

I'm starting to hate that sh*t. Because the play doesn't work. Hasn't worked in 3 games now -- the Bills, Giants, and Seattle. It's just a wasted down in the redzone.

I was hoping I wasn't going to see him in the redzone today. He may be nice to throw in any other time. I think I remember him running twice into fg range and the pass to moss. But I dont think he's passed in the redzone and teams know hes going to hand it off or run it himself in the rz

Originally posted by MrTruth:

Originally posted by pitseleh:
I agree with relying on Smith to pass has not produced, but Smith's first two games were great as we did not abandon the run game. We somehow forced ourselves to be one dimensional in the two losses. I say we forced ourselves because we came out passing, they took the lead, and then we had to rely on the passing game when we were behind. We play the best when we come out running and able to stay 2 dimensional. He doesnt need everything to be perfect but needs the D to stay honest to both parts of the offense

Rely on AS to pass makes the offense 1 dimensional and that's what the AS critics want. They want him to fail. Running the ball only balance the offense out and keep the defense honest and defending the run and the pass. Inserting CK does nothing now, cause every team has tape on him and it disruption AS and the offense.

Originally posted by mug0mug:

Originally posted by MrTruth:

Originally posted by pitseleh:

I agree with relying on Smith to pass has not produced, but Smith's first two games were great as we did not abandon the run game. We somehow forced ourselves to be one dimensional in the two losses. I say we forced ourselves because we came out passing, they took the lead, and then we had to rely on the passing game when we were behind. We play the best when we come out running and able to stay 2 dimensional. He doesnt need everything to be perfect but needs the D to stay honest to both parts of the offense

Rely on AS to pass makes the offense 1 dimensional and that's what the AS critics want. They want him to fail. Running the ball only balance the offense out and keep the defense honest and defending the run and the pass. Inserting CK does nothing now, cause every team has tape on him and it disruption AS and the offense.

I disagree. The Kaepernick package overall has been fairly successful, but more to the point, his package takes away probably a full meeting and at least a half a day of practice for opponents.

Opponents need to go over how to defend his package, even if we only use it 2 or 3 plays a game. Everything people call "cute," is another thing to cover during an opponent's few days of game-planning. Even if the plays aren't successful on gameday, they still work, in that they at least detract from the opponent's preparation.