[ Edited by JiksJuicy on Aug 29, 2012 at 15:41:59 ]
There are 51 users in the forums
Originally posted by DirtyP:
Originally posted by ninermedic:
You're referring to the year that the Ravens won the Super Bowl? They won the Super Bowl. That's the pinnacle, the highest achievement. I know Dilfer was never great (or good), but it's hard to argue that he wasn't a good fit for the team that accomplished that.
I could argue that if the Ravens had a better QB they would have won more than one superbowl
Originally posted by FL9er:
Oh look, another Alex Smith "is trash" thread. You people are going to put yourselves in a psych ward arguing the pros and cons of #11 as relentlessly as yall do.
Carry on.
Originally posted by oldman9er:after all the times the mods scolded us and locked alex threads because we were not quote "moving forward". nice double standard in my opinion
Delightful rehashing... thanks so much Oscar and (presumably) Cowboys fan Richard.
Originally posted by ninermedic:
They've done studies, it's physically impossible to win more than one Super Bowl a season
Originally posted by Wodwo:My only worry would have been:
Denver O-line > 49ers O-line
I still worry about pass protection.
Other than that... Peyton is just a better QB than Alex. I think that's something we can all agree on.
I guess there's the money issue, too. Lulz.
Originally posted by AXEGRINDER:
Wow. Talk about a nuclear thread.
Originally posted by cciowa:
started by the mods who always lecture us humanoids about not starting threads that will incite and divide
Originally posted by PatrickWillisHOF:
Of course he would have been a better quarterback. He is one of the greatest QB's of all time. Apparently he has been working well with John Fox. Peyton said last week that he wants the offense to run the football a lot. I dont think he would have had any problems getting along with Harbaugh.