Originally posted by pasodoc9er:
This is just a question moreso than an endorsement. So we FA a #1 WR and draft a #2WR. Okay, to get that #2 we may have to give up something to go way up in the draft. Say we make a run at blackmon, and offer craps plus our 2nd our maybe our first.
Think about this: Say we do get bowe FA. Now we have 2 #1 wr, and i don't see baalke paying 2 guys to be a #1, when craps has produced no more than a #4 or #5WR.
Therefore, I think it is likely craps moves on if we go high to get a bonafide #2 in draft. Also then baalke pays #1 money to our FA WR only. Any thots on this? If we do acquire the two guys mentioned above that would leave FA #1, draftee #2, morgan #3 , kyle #4,and Ginn #5.
Stop with this inane nonsense, plus your writing hurts my eyes. Also calling Crabtree "craps" is not clever or witty and makes you sound like a snarky 12 year old.
Crabtree is a solid receiver to have, not really a #1, not really a #2, somewhere in between. If the 49ers can further open up the offense more, he'll be left open more often. Basically the 49ers had 2 threats this year in the passing game, VD and Crabtree, when a team only has to focus on two guys, it makes things a hell of a lot easier. Crabtree is fine, he's a great contributor to the team, if they can sign someone like Garcon, then with Garcon, Crabtree, Morgan and a rookie this team will all of the sudden have a very nice corps of WR's.