Originally posted by SundayTicket:
Originally posted by JTsBiggestFan:
Originally posted by JoeisGod:
Are you saying the 9ers winning the Superbowl this year (2011-2012) is somewhat like Leon Spinks winning the heavyweight title from Ali? Too much too soon? Perhaps you are on to something here. If we are looking for one title and done rather than be in the hunt year after year, then yeah I can see you point.
I'm a patient mf'er......I'd rather a more surefire dynasty than a SB one and done.
As I said before, we are young enough to be legitimately strong for some years to come.
You would think fans on the zone are living in 1990 right now, not 1980.
BTW, we should look at how the Giants managed to win 2 superbowls in 4 years with nothing more than a strong DL, good WRs, and elite QB. Their balance is freaking whacky.....we should be able to top that.
BTW, the underlined completely contradicts what your saying.. giants won the superbowl, then won it again in the next 4 years... But shouldnt they of never won again because they won it once? your logic is making no sense
Well in the Giants case they have an elite QB and a defense that shows up in big games. Also, this year and '07 they had a strong WR corps....the years in between weren't as strong as those two years.
I love the outlash against my talk here when it's more of "look at the bright side" attitude instead of "losing was absolutely needed!!"......
Bunch of spoiled fans we are. I will do some research but I want to see how many teams had a 5-10+ playoff draught and won the superbowl the very first year they broke the spell.
My guess is it's very close, if not 0.