There are 95 users in the forums
Originally posted by sincalfaithful:
I would've rather seen the benefits of winning the superbowl
Originally posted by SundayTicket:
Originally posted by JTsBiggestFan:
Originally posted by JoeisGod:
Are you saying the 9ers winning the Superbowl this year (2011-2012) is somewhat like Leon Spinks winning the heavyweight title from Ali? Too much too soon? Perhaps you are on to something here. If we are looking for one title and done rather than be in the hunt year after year, then yeah I can see you point.
Exactly.
I'm a patient mf'er......I'd rather a more surefire dynasty than a SB one and done.
As I said before, we are young enough to be legitimately strong for some years to come.
You would think fans on the zone are living in 1990 right now, not 1980.
BTW, we should look at how the Giants managed to win 2 superbowls in 4 years with nothing more than a strong DL, good WRs, and elite QB. Their balance is freaking whacky.....we should be able to top that.
BTW, the underlined completely contradicts what your saying.. giants won the superbowl, then won it again in the next 4 years... But shouldnt they of never won again because they won it once? your logic is making no sense
Originally posted by JerryRice1848:
How about the possible negatives of not winning the SB this year?
Originally posted by oldman9er:that.
Originally posted by susweel:
Man there aint no benefits for not winning the super bowl.
This! .. and stop making me agree with this individual !!!
Originally posted by WillistheWall:Originally posted by susweel:Man there aint no benefits for not winning the super bowl.
Stop making stupid ass threads.
+1, winning the superbowl is the whole point of playing. There is no benefit of not winning the superbowl.
Originally posted by SundayTicket:People overlook the fact that the Giants really should not have gone to the SB this year. They were the recipient of every f**king break possible throughout the playoffs.
Originally posted by JTsBiggestFan:
Originally posted by JoeisGod:
Are you saying the 9ers winning the Superbowl this year (2011-2012) is somewhat like Leon Spinks winning the heavyweight title from Ali? Too much too soon? Perhaps you are on to something here. If we are looking for one title and done rather than be in the hunt year after year, then yeah I can see you point.
Exactly.
I'm a patient mf'er......I'd rather a more surefire dynasty than a SB one and done.
As I said before, we are young enough to be legitimately strong for some years to come.
You would think fans on the zone are living in 1990 right now, not 1980.
BTW, we should look at how the Giants managed to win 2 superbowls in 4 years with nothing more than a strong DL, good WRs, and elite QB. Their balance is freaking whacky.....we should be able to top that.
BTW, the underlined completely contradicts what your saying.. giants won the superbowl, then won it again in the next 4 years... But shouldnt they of never won again because they won it once? your logic is making no sense
Originally posted by TalkinBoutWILLIS:
so based off your point why would we ever want to win the superbowl. there are always people who will want paydays, retire, new deals. make absolutely no sense
Originally posted by susweel:
Man there aint no benefits for not winning the super bowl.
Stop making stupid ass threads.