There are 64 users in the forums
Originally posted by rodbeezy:
Originally posted by susweel:
Originally posted by WildBill:
Originally posted by ChazBoner:
last i heard, we might even lose the "49ers" from the name. Like when the Oilers moved to Baltimore.
Why? a 49er is not synonomous with only San Francisco.
I heard San Francisco wants to keep the name so it can get another franchise like Cleveland did.
All talk at this proposal. Last momentum it had was back in 2006. SF is too knee deep in their own political s**tstorm (Hello Mirkarimi!) to even think about things like this.
And even if they were successful in doing so, I give it about 10-15 yrs before they even field an expansion team. No way you get the expansion "San Francisco 49ers" to play at the 'Stick.
Originally posted by English:
London 49ers
Originally posted by SnakePlissken:
We're gonna do what New York and New England do; they play miles outside of their name-sake's city, and although both hold the SB parade within the name-sake's city, the team (all players and coaches who attended the parade) put out a small celebratory junction within the city/town the actual stadium is in (to ease the taxpayers), the day after.
Originally posted by GoalLineStand:True, but the franchise was once known as the Boston Patriots.
Originally posted by SnakePlissken:
We're gonna do what New York and New England do; they play miles outside of their name-sake's city, and although both hold the SB parade within the name-sake's city, the team (all players and coaches who attended the parade) put out a small celebratory junction within the city/town the actual stadium is in (to ease the taxpayers), the day after.
Umm, New England is not a city, it's a region.
Originally posted by darkknight49:
i wonder how many more times this is gonna be asked over the next two years....
Originally posted by Aussie49er:
Yes our name will changed
but only to Superbowl Champs