There are 47 users in the forums
- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Post on Google+
- Post on LinkedIn
- Post on Digg
- Post on Delicious
- Post on StumbleUpon
- Post on Reddit
- Post on Tumblr
Will we still be san fran if we move?
Feb 10, 2012 at 14:06:17
#46
- JerryRice1848
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,470
Feb 10, 2012 at 15:38:40
#47
- WildBill
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,108
Originally posted by ChazBoner:
last i heard, we might even lose the "49ers" from the name. Like when the Oilers moved to Baltimore.
Why? a 49er is not synonomous with only San Francisco.
Feb 10, 2012 at 16:41:29
#48
- VaBeachNiner
- Veteran
- Posts: 9,203
Golden State Warriors.
Feb 10, 2012 at 16:47:09
#49
- H41L5ATAN
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,401
San Francisco 49ers of Santa Clara of California of the United States of the Western Hemisphere.
Feb 10, 2012 at 16:48:24
#50
- susweel
- Veteran
- Posts: 48,590
Originally posted by WildBill:
Originally posted by ChazBoner:
last i heard, we might even lose the "49ers" from the name. Like when the Oilers moved to Baltimore.
Why? a 49er is not synonomous with only San Francisco.
I heard San Francisco wants to keep the name so it can get another franchise like Cleveland did.
Feb 10, 2012 at 16:52:35
#51
- rodbeezy
- Veteran
- Posts: 524
Originally posted by susweel:
Originally posted by WildBill:
Originally posted by ChazBoner:
last i heard, we might even lose the "49ers" from the name. Like when the Oilers moved to Baltimore.
Why? a 49er is not synonomous with only San Francisco.
I heard San Francisco wants to keep the name so it can get another franchise like Cleveland did.
All talk at this proposal. Last momentum it had was back in 2006. SF is too knee deep in their own political s**tstorm (Hello Mirkarimi!) to even think about things like this.
And even if they were successful in doing so, I give it about 10-15 yrs before they even field an expansion team. No way you get the expansion "San Francisco 49ers" to play at the 'Stick.
Feb 10, 2012 at 17:29:31
#52
- Marvin49
- Veteran
- Posts: 10,983
Originally posted by 49erRider:
Originally posted by skaw23:
This isn't a pointless thread.
Yes, it is. This has already been discussed in-depth on this forum and has also been well-documented by every single beat writer since they (the Yorks) first announced their intentions to build the stadium in Santa Clara instead of San Francisco.
Actually, it was addressed in the very news conference that the move was annoinced. Right there on the podium they said it would still be the San Francisco 49ers. It has NEVER been in question by anyone but people who oppose the move and were clutching at straws.
Feb 10, 2012 at 17:30:09
#53
- Marvin49
- Veteran
- Posts: 10,983
Originally posted by susweel:
Originally posted by WildBill:
Originally posted by ChazBoner:
last i heard, we might even lose the "49ers" from the name. Like when the Oilers moved to Baltimore.
Why? a 49er is not synonomous with only San Francisco.
I heard San Francisco wants to keep the name so it can get another franchise like Cleveland did.
LOL. Nice.
Feb 10, 2012 at 17:30:48
#54
- Marvin49
- Veteran
- Posts: 10,983
Originally posted by rodbeezy:
Originally posted by susweel:
Originally posted by WildBill:
Originally posted by ChazBoner:
last i heard, we might even lose the "49ers" from the name. Like when the Oilers moved to Baltimore.
Why? a 49er is not synonomous with only San Francisco.
I heard San Francisco wants to keep the name so it can get another franchise like Cleveland did.
All talk at this proposal. Last momentum it had was back in 2006. SF is too knee deep in their own political s**tstorm (Hello Mirkarimi!) to even think about things like this.
And even if they were successful in doing so, I give it about 10-15 yrs before they even field an expansion team. No way you get the expansion "San Francisco 49ers" to play at the 'Stick.
He's not being serious...just stirring the pot.
Feb 10, 2012 at 17:47:04
#55
- Dr_Bill_Walsh
- Veteran
- Posts: 8,019
Los Angeles Rams of Anaheim
Feb 10, 2012 at 17:53:52
#56
- susweel
- Veteran
- Posts: 48,590
Originally posted by Dr_Bill_Walsh:Los Angeles Rams of Anaheim
Anaheim Kings
Feb 10, 2012 at 17:57:35
#57
- Dr_Bill_Walsh
- Veteran
- Posts: 8,019
Sporting Club de Futbol dela Santa Clara United 1849
Feb 10, 2012 at 17:58:36
#58
- Dr_Bill_Walsh
- Veteran
- Posts: 8,019
oops....
/thread
Originally posted by Dr_Bill_Walsh:
Sporting Club de Futbol dela Santa Clara United 1849™
/thread
Feb 10, 2012 at 22:46:35
#59
- rodbeezy
- Veteran
- Posts: 524
Originally posted by Marvin49:
Originally posted by rodbeezy:
Originally posted by susweel:
Originally posted by WildBill:
Originally posted by ChazBoner:
last i heard, we might even lose the "49ers" from the name. Like when the Oilers moved to Baltimore.
Why? a 49er is not synonomous with only San Francisco.
I heard San Francisco wants to keep the name so it can get another franchise like Cleveland did.
All talk at this proposal. Last momentum it had was back in 2006. SF is too knee deep in their own political s**tstorm (Hello Mirkarimi!) to even think about things like this.
And even if they were successful in doing so, I give it about 10-15 yrs before they even field an expansion team. No way you get the expansion "San Francisco 49ers" to play at the 'Stick.
He's not being serious...just stirring the pot.
5% facetious, 95% truth
Feb 10, 2012 at 22:48:02
#60
- TheRambler
- Veteran
- Posts: 19,434
©1997-2013 49erswebzone.com. Part of Skybox 360 Media, LLC
