Originally posted by davidboutte:
We gotta restructure Willis....I'm sure he'd be happy to for the team as many stars have before him. His cap number is 17.7 million
wow agreed.
There are 244 users in the forums
Originally posted by davidboutte:
We gotta restructure Willis....I'm sure he'd be happy to for the team as many stars have before him. His cap number is 17.7 million
Originally posted by Hopper:Originally posted by davidboutte:We gotta restructure Willis....I'm sure he'd be happy to for the team as many stars have before him. His cap number is 17.7 million
wow agreed.
Originally posted by SFL49ER:Restructure does not mean release him.
,
,
Originally posted by Hopper:You might as well, disrespecting him like that.
Originally posted by SFL49ER:Restructure does not mean release him.
,
,
Originally posted by valrod33:who cares, its just Patrick Willis. As long as we never disrespect Bowman, I'm fine with it.
You might as well, disrespecting him like that.
Hey Patrick you know that new contract we gave you? Yeah lets re do that
Originally posted by Amir:
Originally posted by valrod33:who cares, its just Patrick Willis. As long as we never disrespect Bowman, I'm fine with it.
You might as well, disrespecting him like that.
Hey Patrick you know that new contract we gave you? Yeah lets re do that
Originally posted by dj43:
Originally posted by 49ersalldaway126:
ccording to Jason La Canfora of NFL.com, he doesn't, "see any way he's back there. The Chargers won't franchise him, they've come out and said that." Indeed they have, as well as saying that the current deal Jackson wants, a five-year, $50 million contract, is too much for them. The only way Jackson is going to remain with the Chargers is if the two sides are able to negotiate a cheaper long-term dealRead more: http://www.fantasysp.com/player/nfl/Vincent_Jackson/461540#ixzz1luKAG7wY
5 year 50 mill for VJAX
can we afford him while resigning alex goldson rogers and brooks?
Not for a guy that does not always play hard.
Trent Baalke said two years ago that the problem with FA was that you pay the very top market value for a guy who you hope will have an even bigger year for you than he has had in the past. He went on to observe that that is not what you get in most cases.
You don't make money betting on the long-shot exceptions.
Originally posted by valrod33:
Originally posted by Hopper:You might as well, disrespecting him like that.
Originally posted by SFL49ER:Restructure does not mean release him.
,
,
Hey Patrick you know that new contract we gave you? Yeah lets re do that
Originally posted by Hopper:
Originally posted by davidboutte:
We gotta restructure Willis....I'm sure he'd be happy to for the team as many stars have before him. His cap number is 17.7 million
wow agreed.
Originally posted by valrod33:
You might as well, disrespecting him like that.
Hey Patrick you know that new contract we gave you? Yeah lets re do that
Originally posted by davidboutte:
We gotta restructure Willis....I'm sure he'd be happy to for the team as many stars have before him. His cap number is 17.7 million
Originally posted by dhp318:
Originally posted by davidboutte:
We gotta restructure Willis....I'm sure he'd be happy to for the team as many stars have before him. His cap number is 17.7 million
you got sources for that? I'm pretty sure it's south of 10 million.
http://www.ninersnation.com/2011/9/10/2411639/nfl-salary-cap-contract-patrick-willis
Originally posted by davidboutte:
We gotta restructure Willis....I'm sure he'd be happy to for the team as many stars have before him. His cap number is 17.7 million