Originally posted by BrianGO:
We have seen what the conservative "play not to lose" approach gets us with Mike Nolan and Mike Singletary. It gets us to perhaps 2-0 at the start of the season, and no playoffs at the end of the season. If you like what Mike Nolan and Singletary did, then that is fine, but we brought Harbaugh in to CHANGE that philosophy, not to continue it.
The main difference is that Nolan & Singletary consistently played not to lose in almost all of our close games. Harbaugh used this approach in
one game. It isn't fair to watch 1 game and expect that to happen every time we're in this situation. From what I understand about Harbaugh, he is flexible with game management. I assume he makes on the field decisions based on his opponents. Perhaps he felt we could afford to "play not to lose" against a weak Seattle team. We don't know if that would be the case against an explosive offense. I think we should give Harbaugh more games before declaring his game management philosophy. There's been games where great coaches like Walsh, Belichick, etc have played not to lose...it doesn't mean that was their philosophy. It just shows that they are able to make decisions based on their opponents/game flow, and not just rely on a strict philosophy they always follow.
And no, I don't like the "play not to lose" approach lol.
Originally posted by BrianGO:
Teams who play with only defense and special teams, are rarely good. The Ravens and the Bucs used to win that way, but they were rare exceptions.
Why would we want to CONTINUE with the Nolan and Singletary philosophies? Weren't we upset with them? What has changed since then?
I don't think we are continuing with Nolan/Singletary's philosophies. I believe Harbaugh envisions a team that will win games on all 3 phases. As far as changes go, I've seen more personnel packages & audibles applied in 1 game than I've ever seen under Nolan/Singletary. There also appears to be a greater emphasis on gameplanning. Sure it was an extremely conservative gameplan, but it was refreshing to even have a plan.
Originally posted by BrianGO:
Our defense and special teams are better, but is this what we wanted with Harbaugh bringing back the "west coast offense"? Wasn't this supposed to be something DIFFERENT?
If the Seattle game was any indication of how our offense will look in the future, then no this isn't what we wanted. However since the team has had a limited amount of time to install the offense, I expect it to improve as the season progresses. Offensively, we weren't explosive in our first game but the creative use of formations/personnel packages gives me reason to believe that we are absolutely different now.
Originally posted by BrianGO:
I'm not saying we will lose the rest of our games or go 1-15, like some have said, I am saying that IF we do not improve our offense in the coming weeks, we will lose. Let's hope they can improve it before then. 
I agree with you bro