Originally posted by Gavintech:Originally posted by Shaj:Originally posted by backontop:Originally posted by Gavintech:Originally posted by nj49erfan:
Rule of thumb is when you have to describe the stat and most people still don't get it, it's probably not a real stat. Or at least not one any one should care about.
With that said Alex is going to be fine next year. Just not 6th best at anything.
Another game has gone by and he's still #1 in red zone QB rating from what I understand. Maybe he'll be 6th best at that next year?
I think it is funny that the haters beleive that anyone who doesn't hate Smith thinks he is going to be the MVP of the league. The truth is the people who are supporting Smith have never said anything along those lines. Most are saying that he showed improvement and progression and deserves to start next season. But hey I guess if you are blind to the improvement and progression that Smith has made then you would be blind to everything else as well.
The word "improvement" is very situation specific. The man improved from an F to a C over the course of 5 years. If I improve from getting 5 DUI's a year down to 3 DUI's a year, do you think that is worthy of excitement? The point is, he may have improved, but he has just cracked an average of 80 passer rating average for the first time in his career, and still has only one 300 yard game, and WAY more INTs than TDs. The list goes on and on. It's not that "haters" hate, they just aren't as delusional as the Smith bandwagoners are.
Alex Smith was already a C his second season. He played three games before getting hurt the next year with receivers that lead the league in drops and had Jim Hostler as the OC for those three games... And still I'd give him a C for those three games too.
He hasn't played since (unless you count three games with a grade 3 separated shoulder) and is playing better than he was when he last played. Its not an F to a C over 5 years. That happened in less than two years (05 and 06). Having not played a full season since then he's gone from a C to at least a B- or B for half of this season.
He's played in 42 games. You can see the progression unless you make it a point to pretend it hasn't and isn't happening. The first 10 games were an F. The next 10 a D. A C for the next 10, and a C+ to a B throughout the last 10.
Alex has lived through a very unique scenario for an NFL QB (all the "excuses" everyone is always complaining about), is still very young for an NFL player, and doesn't have a huge amount of NFL experience to date.
What he has had is linear progression the more he plays. You cant deny that, if do you lose all credibility with the intellectually honest and most people that actually pay attention. If you are willing to admit that he has progressed and gotten better the more he's played then you can have the opinion that this is it, he's hit the ceiling, and you might even be right about that. But you can't say he hasn't progressed and gotten better throughout his career. He has.
a "B" in his last 10, eh ? And how bout Manning and Brees ? They get an "A" of course. So you're telling me that Smith in his last ten games has played just one level below Brees and Manning ? And if we gave guys like McNabb and and Romo a "B" rating (cause obviously they havent been playing at the same level as Manning/Brees), you're telling me that Smith is every bit as good as Romo/McNabb.
This is what you're implying right ?