There are 127 users in the forums

Remember
Not a member? Register Now!

Who do we have to man up tight ends?

I don't think our linebackers should be covering TE's all game. I know it's important that we have two safeties deep so having a safety cover is also out of the question. Do you guys think we should be going nickel package and just have Nate cover guys like Daniels and Clark?
It should be Lawson with His size and speed.
Originally posted by MadMartz:
It should be Lawson with His size and speed.

Clearly lawson can't passrush so he better be able to cover. Where is J.peterson when you need him? Oh yeah, in Seattle.
Originally posted by Oakland-Niner:
Originally posted by MadMartz:
It should be Lawson with His size and speed.

Clearly lawson can't passrush so he better be able to cover. Where is J.peterson when you need him? Oh yeah, in Seattle.

he's in Detroit now
Originally posted by DANADA:
Originally posted by Oakland-Niner:
Originally posted by MadMartz:
It should be Lawson with His size and speed.

Clearly lawson can't passrush so he better be able to cover. Where is J.peterson when you need him? Oh yeah, in Seattle.

he's in Detroit now

Oops. My bad.
Originally posted by Mospeed:
I don't think our linebackers should be covering TE's all game. I know it's important that we have two safeties deep so having a safety cover is also out of the question. Do you guys think we should be going nickel package and just have Nate cover guys like Daniels and Clark?


we go nickel and they stay in base formation they'll run it all day.
Good question, we need to take away Clark being he is Peytons security blanket, if we take away the middle of the field and play the run hard, I like our chances in this game.

were gonna need Goldson and Roman to pick up the slack this weekend, they are the keys to slowing down the Colts offense
The answer is nobody. who cares if Manny has a fast .40 he can't cover TE's in this league. 99% of linebackers can't vcover the good TE's in this league That's why you see so many good TE's. As great as VD is playing he's in a dogfight wiht like 5 other TE's just in the NFC. You need a great safety and to really check a TE. Niners don't have thus TE's keep eating them alive. But the safety would need help from linebackers also. At the point Daniels was killing them the whole team should have been checking him.
Maybe we should go nickel on passing downs then? Even if it's a 2wr 1te set? I bet Sing and Man are thinking the same thing. Clements wouldn't be that horrible at the OLB spot if Indy decides to run on a passing down.
Originally posted by Mospeed:
Maybe we should go nickel on passing downs then? Even if it's a 2wr 1te set? I bet Sing and Man are thinking the same thing. Clements wouldn't be that horrible at the OLB spot if Indy decides to run on a passing down.


1. Clements got burned by daniels

2. Clements not being that horrible at OLB if they decide to run.... no, just no
Well it'll be interesting to see what we do this week because I don't think we have a backer who can run with Clark.
Originally posted by Oakland-Niner:
Originally posted by MadMartz:
It should be Lawson with His size and speed.

Clearly lawson can't passrush so he better be able to cover. Where is J.peterson when you need him? Oh yeah, in Seattle.



Rage more please.
Lawson has shown he can cover... Hopefully he'll be able to do a good job of that this weekend.
[ Edited by Lott49ersFan on Oct 27, 2009 at 6:17 PM ]
Originally posted by NeeJ49er:
Good question, we need to take away Clark being he is Peytons security blanket, if we take away the middle of the field and play the run hard, I like our chances in this game.

were gonna need Goldson and Roman to pick up the slack this weekend, they are the keys to slowing down the Colts offense

Well, that's a scary thought.
  • KID9R
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 2,008
Nate should be manned up on Clark cause he's better than most cb's when close to the line of scrimage if Clark stays in to block. Spencer is playing deadly and should be manned up on Wayne.