There are 108 users in the forums

Remember
Not a member? Register Now!

Over the top...Hill to Morgan, Bruce, Davis

Originally posted by BigMar:
Originally posted by valrod33:

Well lookity here.... once again, Valrod33, the very first person attempting to take some one else's thread post "off-subject".

Is anyone surprised?

COOOOOOOOOOOOLLDDD BLOODDEEDDDDD
Originally posted by Method:
Originally posted by BigMar:
Originally posted by valrod33:

Well lookity here.... once again, Valrod33, the very first person attempting to take some one else's thread post "off-subject".

Is anyone surprised?

COOOOOOOOOOOOLLDDD BLOODDEEDDDDD

UNITYYYYYY
  • superkev49
  • Info N/A
Originally posted by oldman9er:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by BigMar:
.... or any of our WR's or TE's going deep down the field on the very first offensive play!

Hope in the Vikings game , but don't care any game.

Enough already with the "very first offensive play" of almost every offensive series being a run.

Let the opposing defense know you can and will try deep, mix it up a bit more. Put the defense on their heals do something the defense thinks you won't or can't do.

It is not every game, Frank Gore going to pop a 80 yard run on the first offensive snap with 8 men in the box.

Obviously I agree! Raye opened up the offense more the second game. Perhaps now he'll open it up even more this week. How about a shot gun formation? A post route? An audible out of a run to a pass when they stack 9 men in the box. Raye's offensive calls are ALL predetermined. If the defense adjusts, we're screwed! And that's why we got owned against the Cards and why we've given up 8 sacks in two games and something like 20 other pressures.

We were in shotgun 18 times against AZ and 14 times vs Seattle... just FYI.

I think the point I don't like is that he always runs in running situations and always passes in passing situations. Going shotgun isn't evidence of opening up a playbook. If, when I'm sat watching the game, I can correctly guess run or pass 85% of the time before the snap then the proper opposition coaches can guess it 85%+ and that's NOT GOOD! Would be great to see us pass deep on 1st down or at least mix it up a bit. Don't rate Jimmy Raye one bit.
  • Danoschar1
  • Info N/A
Definitely agree - screw the run the set up the pass. We are a better rushing team, so therefore it works the other way round. Pass, to set up the run.

That clip is a British guy called Bill Bailey, from the programme - Never Mind the Buzzcocks. And it is uber funny
Originally posted by BigMar:
Originally posted by valrod33:

Well lookity here.... once again, Valrod33, the very first person attempting to take some one else's thread post "off-subject".

Is anyone surprised?

Well Lookity here, its another BigMar thought of the hour thread.

Dude this could have easily gone in the 9ers vs Vikings gameday thread,or even this thread http://www.49erswebzone.com/forum/thread.php?num=130157 we dont need a new thread everytime you think of something
[ Edited by valrod33 on Sep 24, 2009 at 9:37 AM ]
Originally posted by valrod33:
Originally posted by BigMar:
Originally posted by valrod33:

Well lookity here.... once again, Valrod33, the very first person attempting to take some one else's thread post "off-subject".

Is anyone surprised?

Well Lookity here, its another BigMar thought of the hour thread.

Dude this could have easily gone in the 9ers vs Vikings gameday thread,or even this thread http://www.49erswebzone.com/forum/thread.php?num=130157 we dont need a new thread everytime you think of something

You said "we don't need".... when clearly you mean YOU.

Unless "you speak" for the whole board.
Can they at least attempt a pass over 50 yards? Might actually get a PI or something
Originally posted by lamontb:
Can they at least attempt a pass over 50 yards? Might actually get a PI or something

Um...
Originally posted by BigMar:
Originally posted by valrod33:
Originally posted by BigMar:
Originally posted by valrod33:

Well lookity here.... once again, Valrod33, the very first person attempting to take some one else's thread post "off-subject".

Is anyone surprised?

Well Lookity here, its another BigMar thought of the hour thread.

Dude this could have easily gone in the 9ers vs Vikings gameday thread,or even this thread http://www.49erswebzone.com/forum/thread.php?num=130157 we dont need a new thread everytime you think of something

You said "we don't need".... when clearly you mean YOU.

Unless "you speak" for the whole board.

i don't need it

jus sayin
Originally posted by RonMexico:
Originally posted by BigMar:
Originally posted by valrod33:
Originally posted by BigMar:
Originally posted by valrod33:

Well lookity here.... once again, Valrod33, the very first person attempting to take some one else's thread post "off-subject".

Is anyone surprised?

Well Lookity here, its another BigMar thought of the hour thread.

Dude this could have easily gone in the 9ers vs Vikings gameday thread,or even this thread http://www.49erswebzone.com/forum/thread.php?num=130157 we dont need a new thread everytime you think of something

You said "we don't need".... when clearly you mean YOU.

Unless "you speak" for the whole board.

i don't need it

jus sayin
  • B650
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 4,205
I think valrod33 just wants to be valmod33. That is all.
[ Edited by B650 on Sep 24, 2009 at 11:40 AM ]
Originally posted by B650:
I think valrod33 just wants to be valmod33. That is all.

no its valrod33, plus your name cant be changed until you are a veteran
Originally posted by RonMexico:
Originally posted by BigMar:
Originally posted by valrod33:
Originally posted by BigMar:
Originally posted by valrod33:

Well lookity here.... once again, Valrod33, the very first person attempting to take some one else's thread post "off-subject".

Is anyone surprised?

Well Lookity here, its another BigMar thought of the hour thread.

Dude this could have easily gone in the 9ers vs Vikings gameday thread,or even this thread http://www.49erswebzone.com/forum/thread.php?num=130157 we dont need a new thread everytime you think of something

You said "we don't need".... when clearly you mean YOU.

Unless "you speak" for the whole board.

i don't need it

jus sayin

Well considering I'd be the fourth person to reiterate this sentiment, I would say that he did in fact mean "we." Val has a pretty good point actually.
[ Edited by itlynstalyn on Sep 24, 2009 at 12:21 PM ]
Originally posted by B650:
I think valrod33 just wants to be valmod33. That is all.

Hummmmm




Courtesy of billybonka