Please use this thread for post-game analysis of the defense as a whole, and/or individual players.
Be advised that relevant threads may be merged into this one at the discretion of the moderating staff.
There are 171 users in the forums
Defensive post-game analysis (Week 2 vs. Seahawks)
Sep 20, 2009 at 6:58 AM
- kidash98
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 26,621
Sep 20, 2009 at 4:12 PM
- Esco
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 26,027
Bump
Sep 20, 2009 at 4:14 PM
- YungAce
- Veteran
- Posts: 46,915
excellent run game, coverage, and game management. shaun hill needs to learn when to throw the ball away and we really need our pass rush we saw last week
Sep 20, 2009 at 4:15 PM
- SF4EVA
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,098
Domination
3 top WR's in the league and min yds! The pressure is constant and i really guess that D we saw in the preseason was actually vanilla.
3 top WR's in the league and min yds! The pressure is constant and i really guess that D we saw in the preseason was actually vanilla.
Sep 20, 2009 at 4:16 PM
- boast
- Hella Fame
- Posts: 149,561
Sep 20, 2009 at 4:18 PM
- wysiwyg
- Veteran
- Posts: 16,091
Just when you think Willis can't get any better, he does
Sep 20, 2009 at 4:18 PM
- Peanut49
- Veteran
- Posts: 358
Originally posted by SF4EVA:
Domination
3 top WR's in the league and min yds! The pressure is constant and i really guess that D we saw in the preseason was actually vanilla.
You should be sure to define top. By my account they are not. However we did great all around. I'm really starting to love Clements. I can't help, but wonder if Dilfer was not hurt would it have ended the same? Either way Wallace had decent numbers so I think we did great.
Sep 20, 2009 at 4:19 PM
- SF4EVA
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,098
Originally posted by Peanut49:Originally posted by SF4EVA:
Domination
3 top WR's in the league and min yds! The pressure is constant and i really guess that D we saw in the preseason was actually vanilla.
You should be sure to define top. By my account they are not. However we did great all around. I'm really starting to love Clements. I can't help, but wonder if Dilfer was not hurt would it have ended the same? Either way Wallace had decent numbers so I think we did great.
Bold, fitz, and TJ all three of the are top WR's in the league my friend.
Sep 20, 2009 at 4:21 PM
- Kolohe
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 59,863
Pass-rush and pressure was inconsistent, can't believe the DB's played well with it.
Sep 20, 2009 at 4:22 PM
- Schulzy
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,004
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Pass-rush and pressure was inconsistent, can't believe the DB's played well with it.
Feel the same way. I actually don't think our pass rush was good at all - and there wasn't enough creative blitzes.
Major props to the secondary though, especially Clements who is shutting the haters on here up.
Sep 20, 2009 at 4:23 PM
- routebd15
- Veteran
- Posts: 2
I thought we played pretty soft after the first quarter. They got 2 three and outs and then we didn't seem to have any pass rush. I was hoping the Arizona pass rush wasn't a fluke but should we wonder?
Sep 20, 2009 at 4:24 PM
- 9erism
- Veteran
- Posts: 101
Originally posted by Peanut49:Originally posted by SF4EVA:
Domination
3 top WR's in the league and min yds! The pressure is constant and i really guess that D we saw in the preseason was actually vanilla.
You should be sure to define top. By my account they are not. However we did great all around. I'm really starting to love Clements. I can't help, but wonder if Dilfer was not hurt would it have ended the same? Either way Wallace had decent numbers so I think we did great.
Difler??? Difler retired dude... u mean Hasselbeck?
Our defense was very good today! but I see no pash rush what so ever... where did that amazing pass rush go from last week?!
Sep 20, 2009 at 4:27 PM
- Peanut49
- Veteran
- Posts: 358
Originally posted by 9erism:Originally posted by Peanut49:Originally posted by SF4EVA:
Domination
3 top WR's in the league and min yds! The pressure is constant and i really guess that D we saw in the preseason was actually vanilla.
You should be sure to define top. By my account they are not. However we did great all around. I'm really starting to love Clements. I can't help, but wonder if Dilfer was not hurt would it have ended the same? Either way Wallace had decent numbers so I think we did great.
Difler??? Difler retired dude... u mean Hasselbeck?
Our defense was very good today! but I see no pash rush what so ever... where did that amazing pass rush go from last week?!
I drank too much. =( I thought the poster a couple posts up was referring to just today. However, I don't think TJ is a top WR.
Sep 20, 2009 at 4:27 PM
- Kolohe
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 59,863
Originally posted by Schulzy:Originally posted by Kolohe:
Pass-rush and pressure was inconsistent, can't believe the DB's played well with it.
Feel the same way. I actually don't think our pass rush was good at all - and there wasn't enough creative blitzes.
Major props to the secondary though, especially Clements who is shutting the haters on here up.
True, Manusky could've did a better job at blitzing, with Seattle playing with a broken O-line.
Sep 20, 2009 at 4:28 PM
- ChaunceyGardner
- Q46 Draft Winner
- Posts: 21,973
Our defense gets better as the game goes on.