There are 82 users in the forums

Remember
Not a member? Register Now!

The Roster List (53 Man)

  • B650
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 4,205
Welcome to the Grammar Webzone.

Some people are multitasking and not paying attention to grammar, spelling, etc. They're just trying to get their point across, you know? But now that you brought it up, I'm going to look through your posts to find spelling/grammatical errors and bring it to your attention.
I thought finley was clearing beating pescoe
Originally posted by B650:
Welcome to the Grammar Webzone.

Some people are multitasking and not paying attention to grammar, spelling, etc. They're just trying to get their point across, you know? But now that you brought it up, I'm going to look through your posts to find spelling/grammatical errors and bring it to your attention.

You got cut from the grammar final 53.
  • crzy
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 39,284
Yes, get rid of Spurlock

Whew, I thought we were going to cut Jason Hill
Originally posted by Dajanksta:
I thought finley was clearing beating pescoe

they might have thought it wasn't worth the chance of losing pascoe if he didn't clear waivers
Originally posted by NineFourNiner:
Originally posted by teeohh:
Originally posted by NineFourNiner:
What time are cuts due?

i think i read they were due at 1

I thought so, too.

*edit*

Per the NFL roster cut down blog, it's 6 p.m. EDT, which is 3 p.m. for us on the west coast.

Thank you for the "edit."

I thought the announcers last night said it was at 1:00 today.

Shoulda known.
Originally posted by WheresWaldo:
Originally posted by NickSh49:
There is no way we release Spurlock and Ziegler.

That would leave us with... four healthy receivers?

I'd be surprised...

That means the Crabtree deal's got to get done soon.


interesting so we cut two recievers. so now we have - Battle, Bruce, Hill, Jones, Morgan.
five recievers seems fine i don't see anything that would dictate crabtree signing
Originally posted by Dajanksta:
Originally posted by WheresWaldo:
Originally posted by NickSh49:
There is no way we release Spurlock and Ziegler.

That would leave us with... four healthy receivers?

I'd be surprised...

That means the Crabtree deal's got to get done soon.


interesting so we cut two recievers. so now we have - Battle, Bruce, Hill, Jones, Morgan.
five recievers seems fine i don't see anything that would dictate crabtree signing

Jones is injured.
This just in Alex Smith got cut.
if we cut spurlock now, then that tells me they think crabtree will sign

but it's really up to him
Originally posted by NickSh49:
There is no way we release Spurlock and Ziegler.

That would leave us with... four healthy receivers?

I'd be surprised...

Perhaps a Crabtree signing announcement coming??
Originally posted by susweel:
This just in Alex Smith got cut.

And they're sending Willis to the PS. Along with Gore.
Leaving 4 healthy WR is interesting I'm guessing they'll pick up a FA .
Hudson and Spurlock? I hope you are wrong
  • B650
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 4,205
Does anyone seriously think cutting Ziegler or Spurlock has anything to do with Crabtree being signed? They're probably still 20 million dollars apart. We're talking about 5th and 6th WRs here. If Hill and Morgan get cut, then start assuming Crabtree is about to sign.