There are 61 users in the forums

Remember
Not a member? Register Now!

Who is the weakest link on our D????

Who is the weakest link on our D????

Let me hear ya guys ..personal i think its soft a$$ sopoga i havent seen him do jack and he is getting paid like he is nice or something. i look at the FA board and you gotta see at least one or 2 guys you would wanna replace him with...go ahead light it up!
There's some merit to what you say. For a guy with the physical tools he has, supposedly being the strongest guy on the team, he really hasn't lived up to the promise. Each year, he teases us with play that hints at what he can be, but never quite comes up with the goods with any consistency. As far as weakest link though, I'm not so sure. Goldson has much to prove being the new, oft-injured guy. I'd say he's the biggest question mark, at least in terms of durability. Position-wise, I'd say right corner and LDE. Nothing like not committing, eh? It's a tough choice.
come on mark roman!!! but i'd say the other CB
If your voting other..who are you refering to.....Yeah soap disapoints me alot ..goldson is worry cuz he is a so new but ive liked what ive seen. surprised about Franklin he quitely had a really good year last year..i would love for someone to compare his numbers to other 3-4 nt... my bet is top 5 stats!
It's a close tie between Roman and Spencer.
Originally posted by NJNiner:
It's a close tie between Roman and Spencer.

I think he means starters.
There are 2 legit football players on that list, Lawson and Clements, and possibly a third in Goldson. Meanwhile, Haralson didn't make the list?

I know that the OLB is expected to get sacks in the 3-4 but lets not confuse a single skill for all around talent. Lawson is a legit 4-3 OLB stuck in our scheme. In general he is a good football player who happens to suck at getting past O-lineman. Haralson can do one thing and one thing only.
Easily Franklin... unless he can improve greatly.
who ever's at NT.
Originally posted by nannite:
There are 2 legit football players on that list, Lawson and Clements, and possibly a third in Goldson. Meanwhile, Haralson didn't make the list?

I know that the OLB is expected to get sacks in the 3-4 but lets not confuse a single skill for all around talent. Lawson is a legit 4-3 OLB stuck in our scheme. In general he is a good football player who happens to suck at getting past O-lineman. Haralson can do one thing and one thing only.


you are correct my fellow niner fan ...thats why i put up a other choice to right in ....but do you think Paris is a weaker link than ..soap???
also YeS I MEAN STARTERS!~!
Patrick Willis






















  • pwilly
  • Info N/A
It makes me laugh to see how little the average web zoner knows about football. Those results are ridiculous. Goldson and Manny Lawson are the two smart choices as they have shown a lack of ability to do their jobs, though I admit Goldson has a smaller sample size. Manny cant pressure the QB and theres a reason Goldson made those tackles downfield against the raiders: he was giving up long passes in front of him. And dont make me remind you of the half back draw against seattle when he ran right by julius jones. Lastly its a joke that Bly has 0% completly unproven veternen who was cut, yet Clements has 13%.
Originally posted by pwilly:
It makes me laugh to see how little the average web zoner knows about football. Those results are ridiculous. Goldson and Manny Lawson are the two smart choices as they have shown a lack of ability to do their jobs, though I admit Goldson has a smaller sample size. Manny cant pressure the QB and theres a reason Goldson made those tackles downfield against the raiders: he was giving up long passes in front of him. And dont make me remind you of the half back draw against seattle when he ran right by julius jones. Lastly its a joke that Bly has 0% completly unproven veternen who was cut, yet Clements has 13%.

Originally posted by SybErkRimInAL:
who ever's at NT.

+1