I call shenanigans!
There are 73 users in the forums
Originally posted by Youngone:Originally posted by global_nomad:Originally posted by Juniorminime:Originally posted by MadMartz:Originally posted by Juniorminime:
This is killing me....can someone please confirm it.....
A bunch of us have confirmed the report.
are there any other source beside NFL Network ticker?
somethings fishy. The matt's don't know anything and word would have spread on various websites by now.
LOL just because a beat writer doesn't have the news...lol
Originally posted by global_nomad:Originally posted by Youngone:Originally posted by global_nomad:Originally posted by Juniorminime:Originally posted by MadMartz:Originally posted by Juniorminime:
This is killing me....can someone please confirm it.....
A bunch of us have confirmed the report.
are there any other source beside NFL Network ticker?
somethings fishy. The matt's don't know anything and word would have spread on various websites by now.
LOL just because a beat writer doesn't have the news...lol
Well it makes no since. The 49ers have a policy that they don't release "signings" until the player is there at team headquarters and the Matt's would know if he was there.
This makes no sense, the report, if true would read "agreed to terms" not signed. If he was signed the beat reporters would have been one of the first to break it. It must be a typo for glenn coffee.
Originally posted by global_nomad:Originally posted by global_nomad:Originally posted by Youngone:Originally posted by global_nomad:Originally posted by Juniorminime:Originally posted by MadMartz:Originally posted by Juniorminime:
This is killing me....can someone please confirm it.....
A bunch of us have confirmed the report.
are there any other source beside NFL Network ticker?
somethings fishy. The matt's don't know anything and word would have spread on various websites by now.
LOL just because a beat writer doesn't have the news...lol
Well it makes no since. The 49ers have a policy that they don't release "signings" until the player is there at team headquarters and the Matt's would know if he was there.
This makes no sense, the report, if true would read "agreed to terms" not signed. If he was signed the beat reporters would have been one of the first to break it. It must be a typo for glenn coffee.
plus this thread was started 45 minutes ago. It takes only minutes for press releases to be published on various sports websites.
once again I'm calling bull s**t and bad reporting from NFLN
Originally posted by Dajanksta:
That's it I cant wait anymore I'm calling Crabtree to confirm this...
Originally posted by global_nomad:Originally posted by global_nomad:Originally posted by Youngone:Originally posted by global_nomad:Originally posted by Juniorminime:Originally posted by MadMartz:Originally posted by Juniorminime:
This is killing me....can someone please confirm it.....
A bunch of us have confirmed the report.
are there any other source beside NFL Network ticker?
somethings fishy. The matt's don't know anything and word would have spread on various websites by now.
LOL just because a beat writer doesn't have the news...lol
Well it makes no since. The 49ers have a policy that they don't release "signings" until the player is there at team headquarters and the Matt's would know if he was there.
This makes no sense, the report, if true would read "agreed to terms" not signed. If he was signed the beat reporters would have been one of the first to break it. It must be a typo for glenn coffee.
plus this thread was started 45 minutes ago. It takes only minutes for press releases to be published on various sports websites.
Originally posted by ddc58:
just tweeted Rich Eisen....
Originally posted by ddc58:
just tweeted Rich Eisen....
Originally posted by Genius1310:Originally posted by ddc58:
just tweeted Rich Eisen....
Just set up a Twitter acct...how do I uh...tweet...someone? I added MM...thought Id shoot him a tweet...twit...whatever!