Originally posted by 9erfanAUS:
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by Bali-Niner:
Originally posted by dankmeistr:
Has anyone else noticed all the negative articles on the 49ers move/stadium deal with Santa Clara from the SF Chronicle? It seems like they are working for the city by pumping out negative information in order to sway popular opinion. I find it very funny, and interesting at the same time.
The articles don't sound negative to me.
They sound like; these are the SF Niners, they have 63 years of history in SF, they could have a far more killer new stadium on the water front with views across the Bay, than sitting in a bare parking lot in SC. In an area without any ambiance or class.
They are saying the Niners won and lost in Kesar and the Stick, the history is there, not in SC. They are saying after the 500,000 people on th estreets of SF after the first SB win and succeeding huge crowds at the parades in down town SF, what are they going to do if they win again; have a parade in Silicon freakin Valley?
What they say is the truth, SC sucks, the parking lot there sucks, and.. it is ALL ABOUT the money for the York's, still.
I don't want to hear any crap about a toxic dump, smell the air in SC, and they will clean it and it, Hunters Point, would be ONE of the most classic location-venues to tailgate and watch NFL football in the USA. The parking lot in SC will compete on that level, not...
So, how does this compare to a parking lot in a barren area of SC valley? NOT EVEN CLOSE!!!!!!!!
I read your first sentence and got my hopes up for an objective non-biased argument. But you're right. Why build in a city with 300+ days a year with sunshine in an area with highways that are near by and closer to the majority of 49er fans when you can build on a windy and cold toxic waste site?
For history, right? Because it matters.
I mean, we should hire Jerry Rice as our next offensive coordinator. Even if he is completely inept as a coach, at least we can say we have a link to history!
Same. I was deceived.
How, can an argument not be biased? If I agree with you, then there is no conversation except for back slapping. I don't get that.
I repeat, there is no comparison between the two sites, and the US Gov has ALREADY approved the money to clean it the rest of the way so sissy folks won't freak if they want to go there.
The article synopsis were not biased, but mine sure was; and damn proud of it too.
Hey, f*t girls are convenient too, easy to meet and greet, but is that what you want?
BurgerKing and the rest are convenient, but do you want a steady diet of it?
Heck, I'm just jaded, I saw it all, all the way to parts of the last couple years, in person, every game.
I like the Stick, I like the smell in the morning with all the Q's cookin, I like the old asphalt flooded with fantastic memories..
I've always made fun of that parking lot with the dumb amusement park every time I drove past it on the way to the Stick, IF, I noticed it at all...
You guys can talk it up all you want, but you can't put a dress on a hog and fool me..