SF, ATL, NY, GB, Chi, Wash
Den, NE, Pitt, Hou, Mia, Indy
There are 472 users in the forums
2013 Playoffs: Who's in? Who's out?
- 1 2
Shop 49ers game tickets
May 8, 2013 at 2:22 AM
- jreff22
- Veteran
- Posts: 67,356
May 8, 2013 at 2:32 AM
- LieutKaffee
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,988
Originally posted by jreff22:
SF, ATL, NY, GB, Chi, Wash
Den, NE, Pitt, Hou, Mia, Indy
Kicking Seattle out of the playoffs by sheer force of will? I like it!
May 8, 2013 at 3:02 AM
- Rascal
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,926
Originally posted by jreff22:
SF, ATL, NY, GB, Chi, Wash
Den, NE, Pitt, Hou, Mia, Indy
No Seattle ?! I can't see it.
May 8, 2013 at 4:09 AM
- RishikeshA
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,720
If Dalton and Bradford become more than game managers both could be dangerous. Their mutual problem is arm strength. Peyton Manning and Brady are on the decline, the only question is how fast they start going downhill. Miami is my sleeper.
May 8, 2013 at 4:20 AM
- LieutKaffee
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,988
Originally posted by RishikeshA:
If Dalton and Bradford become more than game managers both could be dangerous. Their mutual problem is arm strength. Peyton Manning and Brady are on the decline, the only question is how fast they start going downhill. Miami is my sleeper.
Cincinnati has improved enough around Dalton (I agree Dalton is limited) that I think they are right in the thick of it with Pittsburgh and Baltimore. St. Louis is at a similar point in development to Cincinnati, but perhaps a year behind. SF and SEA are also bigger obstacles at this point than BAL and PIT.
Peyton and Brady are interesting indeed. I've always felt like a Peyton homer in that debate, so I'm sort of rooting for Brady to decline faster and for Peyton to go out on top. In last year's playoffs, I thought they both showed some troubling signs.
I do like Miami's chances to improve, but after DEN, NE, IND, HOU and the North champ, there is literally only room for one more AFC team. Miami's only hope is that either IND or HOU regress big-time so the South only gets one playoff team, and/or Miami must have a better record than both teams that lose the North and both teams that lose the West. You have to like Miami more than five of these seven teams: IND, HOU, PIT, BAL, CIN, KC, SD.
May 8, 2013 at 4:25 AM
- RishikeshA
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,720
Originally posted by LieutKaffee:
Cincinnati has improved enough around Dalton (I agree Dalton is limited) that I think they are right in the thick of it with Pittsburgh and Baltimore. St. Louis is at a similar point in development to Cincinnati, but perhaps a year behind. SF and SEA are also bigger obstacles at this point than BAL and PIT.
Peyton and Brady are interesting indeed. I've always felt like a Peyton homer in that debate, so I'm sort of rooting for Brady to decline faster and for Peyton to go out on top. In last year's playoffs, I thought they both showed some troubling signs.
I do like Miami's chances to improve, but after DEN, NE, IND, HOU and the North champ, there is literally only room for one more AFC team. Miami's only hope is that either IND or HOU regress big-time so the South only gets one playoff team, and/or Miami must have a better record than both teams that lose the North and both teams that lose the West. You have to like Miami more than five of these seven teams: IND, HOU, PIT, BAL, CIN, KC, SD.
I was impressed with Miami when they played the Niners. They made some bold moves, Wake is elite. Tannehill has a gun.
May 8, 2013 at 5:42 AM
- 9ersLiferInChicago
- Veteran
- Posts: 11,248
I honestly do not see the Seaducks as a lock.
May 8, 2013 at 5:45 AM
- vaden
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,026
NFC: SF, GB, NYG, NO, SEA, TB
AFC: NE, PIT, DEN, HOU, CIN, IND
I have 5 of 6 AFC teams returning to the playoffs, which is extremely unlikely, but the bottom 9 teams just seem so weak. I wanted to pick CLE but it's inexcusable that they aren't even trying to upgrade the QB position.
AFC: NE, PIT, DEN, HOU, CIN, IND
I have 5 of 6 AFC teams returning to the playoffs, which is extremely unlikely, but the bottom 9 teams just seem so weak. I wanted to pick CLE but it's inexcusable that they aren't even trying to upgrade the QB position.
May 8, 2013 at 8:35 AM
- Canadian9erfan
- Veteran
- Posts: 547
In no particular order
NFC: 49ers, Packers, Falcons, Giants, Seattle, Panthers (I believe Cam really turns it up and Saints remain average)
AFC: Pats, Broncos, Texans, Bengals, Chiefs, Colts (Steelers and Ravens both finish somewhere between 7-9 and 9-7 and miss playoffs)
NFC: 49ers, Packers, Falcons, Giants, Seattle, Panthers (I believe Cam really turns it up and Saints remain average)
AFC: Pats, Broncos, Texans, Bengals, Chiefs, Colts (Steelers and Ravens both finish somewhere between 7-9 and 9-7 and miss playoffs)
May 8, 2013 at 8:52 AM
- NYVAGIANTSSUCK
- Member
- Posts: 159
NFC: 49ers, Pack, Falcons, NYG(Would love to destroy them once and for all in the playoffs), Seattle, and Carolina
AFC: Pats, Broncos, Texans, Ravens, Bengals, and Chiefs
AFC: Pats, Broncos, Texans, Ravens, Bengals, and Chiefs
May 8, 2013 at 9:48 AM
- mcbaes72
- Veteran
- Posts: 9,679
You wanna laugh in Dec, okay...
AFC
East: Bills (Division Champs)
North: Browns (Division Champs)
South: Jaguars (Division Champs)
West: Raiders (Division Champs)
SB Favorite: Browns
NFC
East: Eagles (Division Champs)
North: Lions (Division Champs)
South: Bucs (Division Champs)
West: Cardinals (Division Champs)
SB Favorite: Cardinals
SB PREDICTION: Browns 24 - Cards 10
Book it!
AFC
East: Bills (Division Champs)
North: Browns (Division Champs)
South: Jaguars (Division Champs)
West: Raiders (Division Champs)
SB Favorite: Browns
NFC
East: Eagles (Division Champs)
North: Lions (Division Champs)
South: Bucs (Division Champs)
West: Cardinals (Division Champs)
SB Favorite: Cardinals
SB PREDICTION: Browns 24 - Cards 10
Book it!
May 8, 2013 at 9:57 AM
- RealShaloop
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,121
NFC: SF GB WAS ATL SEA NO
AFC: NE DEN IND PIT CIN BAL
Not the exact order of seeding but just the teams that make it imo
AFC: NE DEN IND PIT CIN BAL
Not the exact order of seeding but just the teams that make it imo
[ Edited by RealShaloop on May 8, 2013 at 9:58 AM ]
May 8, 2013 at 9:59 AM
- English
- Moderator
- Posts: 41,411
Originally posted by Rascal:Originally posted by jreff22:SF, ATL, NY, GB, Chi, Wash
Den, NE, Pitt, Hou, Mia, Indy
No Seattle ?! I can't see it.
I don't see Seattle as a lock. Tough games in the west and someone has to loose. Tough getting a wildcard with that divisional competition. And whilst I see them as tough competition for the future I think this year will be a disappointment for them.
May 8, 2013 at 10:52 AM
- Rizvi49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 219
Originally posted by Rascal:
Originally posted by jreff22:
SF, ATL, NY, GB, Chi, Wash
Den, NE, Pitt, Hou, Mia, Indy
No Seattle ?! I can't see it.
it's called regression to the mean...
- 1 2