Originally posted by LifelongNiner:
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by hofer36:sure could have used cooper. proof that our golden front office and coaches are not always on the right side of a player decision
this chief team looks and plays alot like the 2011 niners though reid likes to throw the ball more
do the chiefs only have 2 run plays--stretch right and stretch left....they could really use a power back to complement charles (peyton hillis got cut, and i know he didnt leave chiefs on good terms...michael turner might be good for 5-10 carries a game)
that cornerback cooper looked real good for chiefs--where did he come from?
the smith critics often overlook the more subtle aspects of his game if you ask me----one thing is he is pretty mobile, and his pocket awareness has improved greatly since he enetered the league---the buying of time before hitting mccluster for 5 yards on 3rd and 5, and another play lynch noted where he made 1 step up in the pocket to find room to throw and complete another 3rd down pass, are a couple examples.........
also his play action...the play fake and pass to the 4th string te was primo
speaking of tight ends, seattle made a mistake dumping mcgrath--he has looked good
Not sure I agree with this one. They intended on keeping him. Unfortunately the Chiefs had room on their 53 man. We already had Rogers, Brown, Asomugha, Cox, Brock, and eventually Eric Wright. He wasn't making our 53 man roster. I think it's proof that our front office has more talent than the NFL will allow us to have . Get used to seeing talented guys we draft go on and do well for other teams.
i think you can give a roster spot to a prospect like cooper instead of keeping 5 inside linebackers (nate stupar)