Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 838 users in the forums

D. Revis or P. Harvin?

Shop 49ers game tickets

D. Revis or P. Harvin?

I say Revis. I know I have sounded like a broken record on this board but it's the same scenario as when we signed Deon Sanders then instantly won the superbowl. Sure we payed a lot for him but then we got a trophy. Sign him and pay him what he's worth.

In fantasy land I want Harvin, Wallace, and Revis but that is not going to happen. I can dream though.
Revis
Revis specifically because next year our offense will be just about the same as last season minus moss and possibly delanie. Our defense will be same minus possibly soap rjf and goldson. With the same team as last season (practically) what was the glaring weekness that got us torched in the sb. Hint it wasnt the offense.
Revis because we can draft a guy like Tavon Austin who brings in a similar skillset to that of Harvin. With Revis you take out the other team's best receiver, he becomes a near- non factor. Harvin would provide more versatility but is a headcase. Revis in this locker room provides another voice to be heard, he has always struck me as a good leader as well as great corner.

Edit: I know they have no time table but at some point we'll have Kyle Williams and Manningham come back. Them plus Crabtree, Jenkins, Hall, Lockette and a rookie. That rookie could be anybody, and Harvin does not strike me as the type Harbaugh is willing to gamble on.
[ Edited by shaneblonien on Feb 28, 2013 at 5:20 PM ]
Revis
kaepernick adds another dimension to our offense to make it dangerous enough as to where we might not need another top wr. i think revis upgrade our defense and create nightmares for opposing offenses.
  • MarkD
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 2,611
Neither. This team was built through the draft. While adding supporting pieces through FA. These two are both head cases and would be asking for to much money. We have are own players and their upcoming salaries to worry about. They are simply not worth it.
We can use Jenkins like Harvin...just don't do it...yet.

Revis? I think we learned that sometimes the pass rush won't be there and we play a TON of dominant WR's every single year. You aren't going to shut them down with a half-assing-it-Rogers, a small Brown or a dumb Culliver. And we haven't exactly had the best S coverage help for the CB's to say the least either soooo...

Revis with something to prove (return from injury, contract year and his new hatred for Sherman?) = expect the best from him. We win a Superbowl or come close and a year with THIS team, it's character and locker room, you'll see him take a reasonable contract like Brooks, Rogers, Willis, Bowman, etc.
  • krizay
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 26,585
Oh the myth

before this year harvin missed 3 games in 3 years

before this year. Revis missed 3 games in the last 3 years.

would love either. but i would say revis

Manningham and crabtree with revis as #1 CB is better than Harvin and crabtree with Rogers as our #1 cb
I'd take harvin, Moss is old and might not return. Kyle and Mannham are coming off hugh injuries. A.J. still hasn't caught a pass. Walker might not return. So all we have is crabtree and davis.... The defense doesn't need another cb that's overpaid and getting old, as much as the offense needs a young pass catcher, like to get colin some help, we've already got 2 injury prone wr's with a third we might get lucky and have one different guy injured every week... We really need to help colin!!!
Originally posted by MarkD:
This team was built through the draft. While adding supporting pieces through FA.

Really? Because the anchor of the defense and the most important player (as well as the best player) on this team was acquired via free agency. When he is hurt or not on the field altogether, our defense falls from great to just "good" and at times it can't even be considered that. He is more than just a "supporting piece." Sometimes you have to go out and get a guy that you know will improve your team. Period.

Revis is a difference maker. You don't use excuses like "we build through the draft" to argue against going after the best player in the league at a position your team needs. If you can get him, you try to get him.
[ Edited by 49erRider on Feb 28, 2013 at 5:31 PM ]
I would take Harvin in a hearbeat. He's the deep threat opposite Crabs, or the one to blow the top of the opposing D's drawing the safety from the middle leaving Davis with more single coverage. Also, the one to keep 8 or more than 7 men in the box nearly impossible...Just my thinking. Plus he's only 24, and we can still draft Austin and allow him some developmental time. Only problem with paying either of these guys, is the ripple effect it could have on the locker room. We have some very important decisions coming up with key personnel. I'm always for winning now! I think paying $7-8M for Harvin is much better than A. renting a shut down CB coming off an injury or B. paying $16M yr.
Neither.
  • MarkD
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 2,611
Originally posted by 49erRider:
Originally posted by MarkD:
This team was built through the draft. While adding supporting pieces through FA.

Really? Because the anchor of the defense and the most important player (as well as the best player) on this team was acquired via free agency. When he is hurt or not on the field altogether, our defense falls from great to just "good" and at times it can't even be considered that. He is more than just a "supporting piece." Sometimes you have to go out and get a guy that you know will improve your team. Period.

Revis is a difference maker. You don't use excuses like "we build through the draft" to argue against going after the best player in the league at a position your team needs. If you can get him, you try to get him.

I am talking post Nolan here now. If I wanted to use your logic I could also say the same thing about Nate Clements and Ashley Lelie among others
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone