Yeah I dont get how a SB team has a easy following schedule. Its like the NFL want to see back to back SBs because the last one was too long ago for the casual fans. I thought Detroit at FF would give that Packs offence a run, they only held them in the first half the 2nd Rodgers came out guns blazing and the stadium noise wasnt a factor I think.
The Saints and Giants games against the Packs, didnt watch.
There are 542 users in the forums
Who has Green Bay played this year!
- 1 2
Dec 17, 2011 at 8:00 AM
- ace49ers
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,427
Dec 17, 2011 at 8:02 AM
- Paul
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,729
Saints, Bears, Broncos, Falcons, Giants, Lions...they've beaten a few good teams but honestly I've failed to pay attention. It's sad in a way that the defending Super Bowl champs aren't really being talked about because it's Tebow Time
Dec 17, 2011 at 8:53 AM
- 9er2k
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,395
The Pack are getting talked about because Aaron Rodgers is making it looks so easy and the NFL media is in love with the Packers and their history(If you ever go to one stadium it has to be Lambeau Field,etc...)
Dec 17, 2011 at 8:58 AM
- luv49rs
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 62,738
who cares
Dec 17, 2011 at 4:33 PM
- ace49ers
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,427
Originally posted by luv49rs:
who cares
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO body!
Dec 17, 2011 at 4:38 PM
- susweel
- Hall of Nepal
- Posts: 122,177
Originally posted by luv49rs:
who cares
.
Dec 17, 2011 at 5:06 PM
- JTsBiggestFan
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,758
It's probably better to go 16-0 with an easy schedule than 11-5 having beaten and rumbled with some tough teams.
Dec 17, 2011 at 5:18 PM
- SanDiego49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 52,398
They haven't lost a game in 1 year....
Last year and this year going back. I'd say they are pretty good.
Last year and this year going back. I'd say they are pretty good.
Dec 17, 2011 at 5:20 PM
- Ninerjohn
- Veteran
- Posts: 67,449
They beat New Orleans as well as Detroit and NYG on the road. Bottom line is they have easily beaten every team on their schedule and are probably going to go 16-0. I think the only game they might lose is in the Super Bowl. Dont see them losing a playoff game in GB.
Dec 17, 2011 at 5:30 PM
- jojomellon
- Member
- Posts: 1,793
Originally posted by ace49ers:
Yeah I dont get how a SB team has a easy following schedule. Its like the NFL want to see back to back SBs because the last one was too long ago for the casual fans. I thought Detroit at FF would give that Packs offence a run, they only held them in the first half the 2nd Rodgers came out guns blazing and the stadium noise wasnt a factor I think.
The Saints and Giants games against the Packs, didnt watch......
____
You know schedules are made a specific way right? You rotate conferences by year and play 2 other games against a same conference team that finished in the same place as you. This comment makes it seem like you think schedules are manipulated before the season somehow.
Yeah I dont get how a SB team has a easy following schedule. Its like the NFL want to see back to back SBs because the last one was too long ago for the casual fans. I thought Detroit at FF would give that Packs offence a run, they only held them in the first half the 2nd Rodgers came out guns blazing and the stadium noise wasnt a factor I think.
The Saints and Giants games against the Packs, didnt watch......
____
You know schedules are made a specific way right? You rotate conferences by year and play 2 other games against a same conference team that finished in the same place as you. This comment makes it seem like you think schedules are manipulated before the season somehow.
[ Edited by jojomellon on Dec 17, 2011 at 5:32 PM ]
Dec 17, 2011 at 6:27 PM
- JerryRice1848
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,224
Dec 18, 2011 at 12:45 AM
- drunk49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,909
they're 13-0. don't matter at this point.
Dec 18, 2011 at 7:53 AM
- BobS
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,143
Originally posted by ace49ers:
Yeah I dont get how a SB team has a easy following schedule. Its like the NFL want to see back to back SBs because the last one was too long ago for the casual fans. I thought Detroit at FF would give that Packs offence a run, they only held them in the first half the 2nd Rodgers came out guns blazing and the stadium noise wasnt a factor I think.
The Saints and Giants games against the Packs, didnt watch.
Originally posted by jojomellon:It isn't the NFL's fault those 2 teams aren't as strong as last year and the Packers are better.
Originally posted by ace49ers:
Yeah I dont get how a SB team has a easy following schedule. Its like the NFL want to see back to back SBs because the last one was too long ago for the casual fans. I thought Detroit at FF would give that Packs offence a run, they only held them in the first half the 2nd Rodgers came out guns blazing and the stadium noise wasnt a factor I think.
The Saints and Giants games against the Packs, didnt watch......
____
You know schedules are made a specific way right? You rotate conferences by year and play 2 other games against a same conference team that finished in the same place as you. This comment makes it seem like you think schedules are manipulated before the season somehow.
Dec 18, 2011 at 11:39 AM
- Rubberneck36
- HOF
- Posts: 141,822
Who cares, no need to justify their games. You don't have to be better than them all year , just the one time you play them.
- 1 2
