There are 923 users in the forums
49ers in great position to trade down in the 1st
Feb 28, 2013 at 1:48 AM
- IdahoNiner
- Veteran
- Posts: 9,543
If the cards fall right it ould make a lot of sense to drop back and aquire more pics in rounds 2-4, stockpile our pics in those rounds, then in the later rounds try to trade out of those pics for pics next year.
Feb 28, 2013 at 1:54 AM
- smithc28
- Veteran
- Posts: 366
I think getting as many picks under #100 will be the target. If Baalke played it right we could get 7 picks under #100 use the comp picks as depth and trade the rest for more picks next year, and try and land ourselves in the same position next year.
Feb 28, 2013 at 1:54 AM
- smithc28
- Veteran
- Posts: 366
I think getting as many picks under #100 will be the target. If Baalke played it right we could get 7 picks under #100 use the comp picks as depth and trade the rest for more picks next year, and try and land ourselves in the same position next year.
Feb 28, 2013 at 4:07 AM
- Niners23
- Veteran
- Posts: 344
We have too many draft picks already to trade down. We can't afford that many, because we have limited roster spots as it is. Ideally, someone trades a 1st and 3rd in next years draft for our 2nd, since it's the 2nd pick in the round.
[ Edited by Niners23 on Feb 28, 2013 at 4:08 AM ]
Feb 28, 2013 at 4:16 AM
- NC49erfan82
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,658
I would rather start racking up pics for next year from here on.
Feb 28, 2013 at 5:50 AM
- jta854
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,305
We are in a similar position to the Pats a couple of years ago.
Feb 28, 2013 at 6:02 AM
- TlSSER
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,750
2013 = dirty talent draft
2014 = clean talent draft
2014 = clean talent draft
Feb 28, 2013 at 6:20 AM
- SammyFrancisco
- Veteran
- Posts: 465
I agree with this. Posted a mock where we traded back for Arizona's pick. Would love to benefit one more time from a QB-deficient team willing to overpay for their next guy.
Feb 28, 2013 at 6:23 AM
- SammyFrancisco
- Veteran
- Posts: 465
Originally posted by Niners23:
We have too many draft picks already to trade down. We can't afford that many, because we have limited roster spots as it is. Ideally, someone trades a 1st and 3rd in next years draft for our 2nd, since it's the 2nd pick in the round.
Picks this year, picks next year, what's the difference really? We already have 7+ picks next year. If we fill all our holes in this draft we won't need to worry about next year.
Do you know how many from our 53 are currently under contract for 2013? If we draft 15, maybe 2 or 3 are cut or put on practice squad... we might have room for 12 rookies - Harbaugh will love the competition!
Feb 28, 2013 at 6:35 AM
- LottOfDefense
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,754
Most likely scenario IMO. I can see a team getting hungry to jump up into the late 1st early 2nd. I hope that if they do trade down they pick up a 1st next year along with a mid 2nd in this draft. With all the players clumped together in the 1st 100 picks, they could just let the chips fall and pick up future assets.
Feb 28, 2013 at 6:55 AM
- dtg_9er
- Veteran
- Posts: 33,204
Baalke has played this game extremely well and I could see him trading some picks for deferred picks next year. I can also see him trading up with picks from the 5th round down and down from the first round as you suggest.
The key is that the niners are in a position to move wherever they want to get the help they need. It's a wonderful, wonderful position to be...trade forward, backward, to next year, maybe even for 2015 picks...yowza!
The key is that the niners are in a position to move wherever they want to get the help they need. It's a wonderful, wonderful position to be...trade forward, backward, to next year, maybe even for 2015 picks...yowza!
Feb 28, 2013 at 7:29 AM
- bigwads
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,890
My focus would be getting another 2nd (giving us three) and another 3rd (giving us at least two in the third). As of now we only have one fourth, so I am anxious to see how you guys think we are getting seven picks in the top 100, unless you think we are getting 4 thirds.
The heart of the draft IMO is between 28 and 70 or so. There is a ton of DB talent there at the CB and S positions. Just with how the draft is stocked this year, Baalke could rebuild our entire secondary with high draft picks.
The heart of the draft IMO is between 28 and 70 or so. There is a ton of DB talent there at the CB and S positions. Just with how the draft is stocked this year, Baalke could rebuild our entire secondary with high draft picks.
Feb 28, 2013 at 7:29 AM
- socal9er42
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,627
Originally posted by smithc28:
I think getting as many picks under #100 will be the target. If Baalke played it right we could get 7 picks under #100 use the comp picks as depth and trade the rest for more picks next year, and try and land ourselves in the same position next year.
Sounds about right.
Depending on what happens with our own Free Agents, we need to aquire 2-4 STARTERS on defense and about the same on Offense. We are positioned to make a run at the title now, and that will not be dependent on drafting 12-15 rookies, half (or more) of which have zero chance of making the roster. Consolidate a high and low round pick to move up to pick up targeted player(s), trade back or to the future only if there is no choice.
Feb 28, 2013 at 8:12 AM
- sacguy08
- Veteran
- Posts: 85
Originally posted by dtg_9er:
Baalke has played this game extremely well and I could see him trading some picks for deferred picks next year. I can also see him trading up with picks from the 5th round down and down from the first round as you suggest.
The key is that the niners are in a position to move wherever they want to get the help they need. It's a wonderful, wonderful position to be...trade forward, backward, to next year, maybe even for 2015 picks...yowza!
I couldn't agree with you more. Having the freedom and flexibility to move around the draft board as needed is a great feeling to have finally. This is probably how New England has felt for the better part of the last decade.