There are 64 users in the forums
Originally posted by m_brockalexander:
There is going to be talent available at pick #31. Trading down to get more picks when you already have 14 picks seems ludicrous to me.
Originally posted by buck:I cannot agree with the first bold. There isn't a team in the NFL who can go BPA early in the draft. I remember making this same argument last season (and being on the Zones less popular, but winning side). And I would argue that winning teams don't go BPA often, especially not early. The "best player available" at the spot you pick might not be the best player for your team and your system. Winning teams normally trade out of that spot if their guy isn't there, or pick the next player on their big board by need. All teams have contingency plans/picks.
Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:
Agreed! A #1 next season is the only reason I'd trade out of 31st spot this year, and I'm not too hot on that either. Our first 2 picks should be on the D-line - NT and DE, respectfully. It's been a long time since we really addressed the 0-technique, and Cowboy realistically has about two seasons left so we need to get an hair apparent he can mentor.
Our first two picks should be used on the best player available at a position of need.
Getting a starting nose tackle with one of the first two picks should not be a problem.
But, but finding a quality 3-4 defensive end with one of the first two picks, might be a problem.
Originally posted by dlance:
Originally posted by ElephantHaley:
I would not trade up because we are gonna have a bunch of holes sooner rather than later, We can add a whole bunch of depth at crucial postions like the DLINE,Secondary,WR and a Pistol QB to groom to be Kape's backup and Offensive Tackle, Davis and Staley will need breathers and the more top 125 picks, the all that much better and stronger we sustain for the long run. There is no player worth trading up for in this draft, it is a very deep draft everywhere except QB but we just need a developmental type Qb who can learn to be Kape's backup only while they learn.
Really not one play worth trade up for. No one. First if a play they really like fall into the 20's someone they didnt think would be there they should try to trade up. I do not think 14 new player can make the team next year. They need to move around give up some pick this year and try to get more picks next year.
Originally posted by ElephantHaley:
Originally posted by m_brockalexander:
There is going to be talent available at pick #31. Trading down to get more picks when you already have 14 picks seems ludicrous to me.
you make my trade down point even more valid, why not trade down and get just as ggod of talent and have to pay less because of lower round
Originally posted by Rsrkshn:Alex's stats since 2011:
Originally posted by sf1974:
I know our FO doesn't favor trading within our division (neither do I) but, this serves both teams well. The cards would address their glaring need at QB and receive an additional 2nd or 3rd pick to address the loss of Peterson and we get a quality cover corner and return man. I do not see a CB in this years draft in the 2nd or 3rd range that could have the immediate impact (or future impact due to Peterson's youth). I also, don't see an immediate impact QB in this draft (which helps the decision process for the cards). This would free up the Cards to upgrade their horrendous OL situation (if done, Alex should benefit). Just thinking of ways to improve our team using the assets we have at our disposal.
You are waaaaay over rating Alex. And you are really, really under rating the intelligence of the Cardinals FO. They could be the dumbest FO in the league and they would still not make that trade.
I've read you making this suggestion in several threads and have been stunned speechless at the audacity of this proposition. Why don't the Niners just trade Chad Hall and Kyle Williams for Larry Fritzgerald, straight up? That's the level of nonsense that's being proposed here.
A lot of people with unrealistic expectations, and a complete set of blinders on, will be receiving a real wake-up call when the window opens for trading players.

Originally posted by suckafree17:
Yea, 14 guys aren't making this roster. Maybe 8-10
Originally posted by dlance:
Originally posted by ElephantHaley:
I would not trade up because we are gonna have a bunch of holes sooner rather than later, We can add a whole bunch of depth at crucial postions like the DLINE,Secondary,WR and a Pistol QB to groom to be Kape's backup and Offensive Tackle, Davis and Staley will need breathers and the more top 125 picks, the all that much better and stronger we sustain for the long run. There is no player worth trading up for in this draft, it is a very deep draft everywhere except QB but we just need a developmental type Qb who can learn to be Kape's backup only while they learn.
Really not one play worth trade up for. No one. First if a play they really like fall into the 20's someone they didnt think would be there they should try to trade up. I do not think 14 new player can make the team next year. They need to move around give up some pick this year and try to get more picks next year.
This draft is deep at DLine and some nice secondary players. 14 guys won't make this squad. 8 maybe. Package picks to get back in the 2nd and 3rd to get some key guys at areas of need in the future. Depth is the key for us
Would be happy either way but prefer Patterson for the added PUNT return ability
