There are 120 users in the forums

Remember
Not a member? Register Now!

Why do I feel like the Arizona Cardinals are blocking us from players?

They have picked right before us most rounds...

Massie..kelemete..and now bethel..those b*****ds
Originally posted by Giants24:
They have picked right before us most rounds...

Massie..kelemete..and now bethel..those b*****ds

they must read the zone
Hmmm... Maybe because their record is worse than the niners...

Which should explain why they pick ahead of us
[ Edited by Eli_23 on Apr 28, 2012 at 1:49 PM ]
I hope we totally tank it this year so we can draft ahead of them next year.
  • mike
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 1,827
Originally posted by cwilson830:
I hope we totally tank it this year so we can draft ahead of them next year.

lololol I wish we had tanked it better in 2010 so we could have had cam newton f**king troy and Carr didn't suck enough.
If they did, it would be the first time they successfully blocked anything in a while.
Originally posted by GetoThunderFist:
If they did, it would be the first time they successfully blocked anything in a while.

i think this is true about the colts,,,they blocked us from getting andrew luck
Not scared of the Cardinals until they draft some defensive players who are worth a crap.

One word for the Cards... SOFT.

Seahawks aren't soft. Cards are pillowy SOFT baby lotion.
I can't believe the nerve of those d-bags.
  • mike
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 1,827
Originally posted by NickSh49:
Not scared of the Cardinals until they draft some defensive players who are worth a crap.

One word for the Cards... SOFT.

Seahawks aren't soft. Cards are pillowy SOFT baby lotion.

Peterson is going to be a special player in the next few years and Fleming looks promising in the 3rd this year for them too. They got three OTs to try to get competition to fix their o-line problems. With floyd we can no longer just double Fitz(Doucet hurt us a few times when we did that last year and he's not even good).

People like to think the cards are super weak, but keep in mind they were one of only three teams that beat us last year and that was with their backup QB. In those close games they're surprisingly good at blocking field goals.

They're "soft" yet they sacked smith five times.

Cards are more of a threat than the Seachickens by far. Seattle still won't have a quarterback worth a damn, Flynn only played like one full game and vastly benefited from a QB friendly system in GB. Seattle's pass rush is weak(only 2 sacks in 2 games) and special teams got exploited by ginn.
[ Edited by mike on Apr 28, 2012 at 3:53 PM ]
Originally posted by mike:
Originally posted by NickSh49:
Not scared of the Cardinals until they draft some defensive players who are worth a crap.

One word for the Cards... SOFT.

Seahawks aren't soft. Cards are pillowy SOFT baby lotion.

Peterson is going to be a special player in the next few years and Fleming looks promising in the 3rd this year for them too. They got three OTs to try to get competition to fix their o-line problems. With floyd we can no longer just double Fitz(Doucet hurt us a few times when we did that last year and he's not even good).

People like to think the cards are super weak, but keep in mind they were one of only three teams that beat us last year and that was with their backup QB. In those close games they're surprisingly good at blocking field goals.

They're "soft" yet they sacked smith five times.

Cards are more of a threat than the Seachickens by far. Seattle still won't have a quarterback worth a damn, Flynn only played like one full game and vastly benefited from a QB friendly system in GB. Seattle's pass rush is weak(only 2 sacks in 2 games) and special teams got exploited by ginn.

Versus the world-beater at QB for the cards?
Im not gonna lie. I think they had a good draft. Wont be even close to enough though.
  • Ether
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 1,494
Originally posted by mike:
Originally posted by NickSh49:
Not scared of the Cardinals until they draft some defensive players who are worth a crap.

One word for the Cards... SOFT.

Seahawks aren't soft. Cards are pillowy SOFT baby lotion.

Peterson is going to be a special player in the next few years and Fleming looks promising in the 3rd this year for them too. They got three OTs to try to get competition to fix their o-line problems. With floyd we can no longer just double Fitz(Doucet hurt us a few times when we did that last year and he's not even good).

People like to think the cards are super weak, but keep in mind they were one of only three teams that beat us last year and that was with their backup QB. In those close games they're surprisingly good at blocking field goals.

They're "soft" yet they sacked smith five times.

Cards are more of a threat than the Seachickens by far. Seattle still won't have a quarterback worth a damn, Flynn only played like one full game and vastly benefited from a QB friendly system in GB. Seattle's pass rush is weak(only 2 sacks in 2 games) and special teams got exploited by ginn.

We had no problems whooping on the Cardinals when they had Fitz and Boldin, even when we were garbage and they made their Super Bowl run (didn't we sweep them that year?)

Peterson will be a special talent in the same way that Devin Hester was a special talent. He'll be moved to Safety soon enough after they realize he can't cut it at Cornerback.

Oh, and they will always be the same old sorry ass Cardinals.
Originally posted by mike:
Originally posted by NickSh49:
Not scared of the Cardinals until they draft some defensive players who are worth a crap.

One word for the Cards... SOFT.

Seahawks aren't soft. Cards are pillowy SOFT baby lotion.

Peterson is going to be a special player in the next few years and Fleming looks promising in the 3rd this year for them too. They got three OTs to try to get competition to fix their o-line problems. With floyd we can no longer just double Fitz(Doucet hurt us a few times when we did that last year and he's not even good).

People like to think the cards are super weak, but keep in mind they were one of only three teams that beat us last year and that was with their backup QB. In those close games they're surprisingly good at blocking field goals.

They're "soft" yet they sacked smith five times.

Cards are more of a threat than the Seachickens by far. Seattle still won't have a quarterback worth a damn, Flynn only played like one full game and vastly benefited from a QB friendly system in GB. Seattle's pass rush is weak(only 2 sacks in 2 games) and special teams got exploited by ginn.

No way. Maybe if the Cards played at Qwest (or whatever it's called now).

Take away Peterson & Dockett and who do they have on defense???

LINKO

Seriously, you tell me who on that defense scares you? Terrible LB's, mediocre DL, and a decent/average secondary.

SOFT. The Seahawks beat up Delanie and Kyle Williams... give them credit for that (even if it wasn't legal). But the Cards are SOFT like your girlfriend's shea butter body moisturizer. Rub it down, enjoy the silky smooth SOFT touch.
[ Edited by NickSh49 on Apr 29, 2012 at 2:15 AM ]