Wouldn't be mad with trading up for Floyd. Doubt Kalil would fall past STL at 6. Cox or Kaili? I think Rams take the LT of the future.
Anyway, looks like a solid mock.
There are 459 users in the forums
Tico's "Oh Snap!" 2012 Mock V 2.0
Apr 11, 2012 at 1:30 PM
- AB81Rules
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 33,985
Apr 11, 2012 at 1:36 PM
- NinerBuff
- The Election Dude
- Posts: 21,443
I like it!
Hypothetically, are we talking about 1st, 2nd, and 3rd to move up? or maybe 1st, 2nd, and 4th?
Hypothetically, are we talking about 1st, 2nd, and 3rd to move up? or maybe 1st, 2nd, and 4th?
Apr 11, 2012 at 1:45 PM
- SundayTicket
- Member
- Posts: 5,316
i dont think we trade up in the 1st, i think thats why we went after manningham and moss... we are gonna hit BPA at #28 or trade out into the early 2nd round.. maybe pull a pats to pick up a future 1st rounder in exchange to trade back to there 2nd or something along those lines...
Apr 11, 2012 at 1:55 PM
- pdizo916
- Member
- Posts: 38,241
i wish we could trade up but it may cost us our first, second, and third to get that done. I think it's worth the price.
Apr 11, 2012 at 2:22 PM
- CorvaNinerFan
- Veteran
- Posts: 10,447
Don't think Floyd's worth potentially that many picks...there are other needs, like OG/C, RB. If Baalke trades up, it might be for Fleener...Harbaugh doesn't want to let another very good Stanford receiver get away (re: Baldwin last year). Fleener already knows the offense, so could be productive right away and create some horrible matchups for opposing defenses. 2nd rd get your OG/C, maybe Turbin or Quick in 3rd/4th rd.
Apr 11, 2012 at 2:23 PM
- 619Niner
- Veteran
- Posts: 123
Wouldn't be mad trading up to get Floyd but we would have to give away a lot for him
Apr 11, 2012 at 2:24 PM
- GhostofFredDean74
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 30,082
Not likely to happen, but would be
if it did.
if it did.
Apr 11, 2012 at 2:35 PM
- Cjez
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 170,522
we're trading out of the 1st if fleener and hill are gone at 30.
Apr 11, 2012 at 2:50 PM
- Rgonelove
- Veteran
- Posts: 383
nice thoughts,but,i think we stand pat at #30. we pick best player available. i kind of think thats gonna come from the de/dt position
Apr 11, 2012 at 2:53 PM
- nickbradley
- Member
- Posts: 3,755
You're 'oh snap' for the 49er trade-up to #15 makes sense. Our 2nd and 5th get the deal done for a trade-up.
But Kalil would never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never fall to #8. He's a #1 overall pick in a weak draft class -- like we've seen in recent years.
But Kalil would never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never fall to #8. He's a #1 overall pick in a weak draft class -- like we've seen in recent years.
Apr 11, 2012 at 2:55 PM
- GorefullBore
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,440
Thanks Tico for a very enjoyable mock.
Apr 11, 2012 at 2:59 PM
- hondakillerzx
- Veteran
- Posts: 19,274
floyd would be awesome but that may be a lot to give up to move 15 spots. i agree with a few others tho if floyd decastro hill and fleener arent there at 30 were trading back
Apr 11, 2012 at 3:45 PM
- ninertico
- Veteran
- Posts: 10,259
Originally posted by nickbradley:
You're 'oh snap' for the 49er trade-up to #15 makes sense. Our 2nd and 5th get the deal done for a trade-up.
But Kalil would never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never fall to #8. He's a #1 overall pick in a weak draft class -- like we've seen in recent years.
Oh, I hear ya man!
Still, take a look at my mock...
#3 Tannehill
#4 Richardson--They have Thomas
#5 Claiborne--They really, really need a CB more so than replacing their LOT.
#6 Cox--They have Kalil, Blackmon AND Cox to choose from. WRs deep class and they have two OTs worthy of starting position. If any team, it would be StL.
#7 Blackmon--They have a LOT already and NO #1 WRs for Gabbert.
And whala!!! We're at #8 with the Vikes on the clock...hmmmm, sure looks like a possibility rather than a certain million nevers.

Hey! And thanks to all for the comments. I really am sticking with Tannehill at #3 doe...
That's OTC slappin upside my head. lol
[ Edited by ninertico on Apr 11, 2012 at 3:47 PM ]
Apr 11, 2012 at 3:56 PM
- JeuSF49
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,135
Tannehill at 3 would be a HUGE reach, a bigger reach than Heward-Bey and Crabtree...
IMHO Tannehill has potential but needs to sit for a yer or two.
IMHO Tannehill has potential but needs to sit for a yer or two.