Originally posted by buck:
Originally posted by MadDog49er:
Originally posted by buck:
This is truly weird. I actually believe that you are serious.
So do you root against the 49ers again this year, because Baakle is that bad, and Luck is that good.
No, I root that the light finally turns on for Alex Smith, and the team plays great. I had zero confidence in Nolan and Singletary. I have a shade of confidence in Baalke that he can figure out how to make better player personnel decisions in the future. And, my criticism of Baalke is also attached to the York's, who may be limiting Baalke's hand.
That being said, if the team starts off slowly in 2011, I'd rather us continue tanking than win meaningless games at the end of the year to lose the shot at Luck. I know it is warped, but think of the difference a superstar QB makes to our team.
I appreciate both the tone and content of your response, but I will wait a day or two to respond. After work, I went out for super and had a few too many pisco sours, and I in no shape for a thoughtful answer. Pisco, by the way, is like rum, or maybe tequila, but made from grapes.
We agree on some points.
Like you, I hope that the light comes on for Alex. I will be happy if he does three things: increases his completion%; reduces his turnovers; and increases the number of first downs.
I would also like to see the team play great, but given the circumstances I will very happy if the team plays well.
If the team plays well, we will have a winning season.
We disagree on other points. in general, I do not think there are any meaningless games, and at this conjuncture every game the 49ers play has meaning.
When a team is working itself up from the bottom, the team needs to improve and learn. This learning and improvement is mainly measured in the games played--in every game, all year.
I played for a perennial loser. We decided that we would become a winning team. It took three years, but we began a winning team and got the city championship. Believe me, every practice, every snap and every game had meaning. Those who claim that winning is everything or the only thing are not be being realistic.
The shade of confidence that you have in Baalke is hard to see. Most of your posts about Baalke have been, to say the least, negative. Beyond being negative, your attitude seems blatantly unfair. Baalke has done some things very well. First, he did hire Harbaugh. If one game means anything, the decision to dump money in the lap of McDonald seems to have been a good one. At this point, his free agent signings (Edwards, Rogers, and Whitner) seem positive. I wanted him to sign Franklin, but now it seems that Baalke was right to let him go. I liked his first draft more than you, but you and I both know that it is too early to judge that draft.
In fact, it is too early to judge Baalke honestly or fairly. We do not enough information, and speculation is not information. Getting that information will take time.
.