Or maybe lukewarm is a smoke screen, and they run to the podium with the card if he is there at #7.
We will know in less than 3 days.
There are 172 users in the forums
Report: Niners 'lukewarm' on slipping Gabbert
Apr 26, 2011 at 11:02 AM
- 9erred
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,154
Apr 26, 2011 at 11:08 AM
- Ninerjohn
- Veteran
- Posts: 66,198
Originally posted by OnTheClock:Originally posted by MadDog49er:
There is so much smoke filling the room these days, that it is impossible to see the truth. I doubt a slide past the Bengals at 4. What are the Bengals going to do? Start Jordan Palmer?
Agreed. Though I see them taking Green, and a QB in the 2nd.
The Giants were "lukewarm" on Pepper Johnson under Parcells. These comments don't mean anything.
I agree. If AJ Green is sitting there I dont see them passing on him. I would think that Ponder, Dalton, or Mallett will be available for them in round 2.
The real question is what will the Niners do because there is absolutley no assurance that one of those 2nd round QBs will be there when the Niners select in round 2. I could see passing on Gabbert IF they plan on moving back up to get their QB at the end of rd 1 or beginning of rd 2. I just cannot believe the Niners will allow themselves to come out of this draft without one of the top 6-7 QBs.
Apr 26, 2011 at 11:09 AM
- Rubberneck36
- Moderator
- Posts: 130,191
Good, would rather have Dalton in the second.
Apr 26, 2011 at 11:15 AM
- Overkill
- Moderator
- Posts: 10,802
Originally posted by 49ersMyLife:
If Gabbert is there at 7, and Peterson is not - I believe we will get a trading partner. Vikings and Redskins will be potential partners, while Miami and Jackonville with the outside chance.
I hope so.
I'm no draft guru, but I don't like the things I've been reading about Gabbert.
Apr 26, 2011 at 11:41 AM
- ninertico
- Veteran
- Posts: 10,259
Originally posted by TDawg1313:
I posted this in another thread, but I think it deserves to be in this thread as well.
"Was just told: "San Francisco loves Jake Locker. Willing to take Locker over Gabbert." Interesting"
LINK
T found this...
Apr 26, 2011 at 11:52 AM
- fakers23
- Member
- Posts: 1,715
Originally posted by ninertico:Originally posted by TDawg1313:
I posted this in another thread, but I think it deserves to be in this thread as well.
"Was just told: "San Francisco loves Jake Locker. Willing to take Locker over Gabbert." Interesting"
LINK
T found this...
That would be a major reach at 7th pick..
Apr 26, 2011 at 11:54 AM
- Snider8706
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,368
Originally posted by valrod33:
Im confident in saying that the Niners will not draft Gabbert if he is there at 7
not even if peterson is gone?
Apr 26, 2011 at 11:55 AM
- fakers23
- Member
- Posts: 1,715
Originally posted by Snider8706:Originally posted by valrod33:
Im confident in saying that the Niners will not draft Gabbert if he is there at 7
not even if peterson is gone?
Yeah... If Peterson gone.. I see us trading down..
Apr 26, 2011 at 11:56 AM
- valrod33
- Hall of Small
- Posts: 137,970
Originally posted by fakers23:Originally posted by Snider8706:Originally posted by valrod33:
Im confident in saying that the Niners will not draft Gabbert if he is there at 7
not even if peterson is gone?
Yeah... If Peterson gone.. I see us trading down..
this
Apr 26, 2011 at 11:58 AM
- Snider8706
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,368
Originally posted by fakers23:Originally posted by Snider8706:Originally posted by valrod33:
Im confident in saying that the Niners will not draft Gabbert if he is there at 7
not even if peterson is gone?
Yeah... If Peterson gone.. I see us trading down..
you never know though, drafts are so unpredictable especially with the lockout going on. if we dont get peterson i hope we get prince.
Apr 26, 2011 at 11:59 AM
- mayo49
- Veteran
- Posts: 64,320
Originally posted by valrod33:Originally posted by fakers23:Originally posted by Snider8706:Originally posted by valrod33:
Im confident in saying that the Niners will not draft Gabbert if he is there at 7
not even if peterson is gone?
Yeah... If Peterson gone.. I see us trading down..
this
That
Apr 26, 2011 at 12:01 PM
- Amir
- RIP Amir, Hall of Fame
- Posts: 28,036
Originally posted by mayo49:Originally posted by valrod33:Originally posted by fakers23:Originally posted by Snider8706:Originally posted by valrod33:
Im confident in saying that the Niners will not draft Gabbert if he is there at 7
not even if peterson is gone?
Yeah... If Peterson gone.. I see us trading down..
this
That
That would be the smart move but it takes two to tango. So someone would have to have their eye on a player to move up to 7.
Apr 26, 2011 at 12:06 PM
- DertyDonahue
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,636
Originally posted by RKab:
Context is really an issue here. NFL-N needed to fill time on Path to the Draft so they were discussing possibilities of guys falling.
Lombardi made an off-hand remark saying he hears that SF is lukewarm so he may fall past 7.
Now I think SF is lukewarm on Gabbert. And I myself, am lukewarm on Gabbert. But to the extent this is being reported I really feel like they are grasping at straws.
Friggin' pundits "hearing" stuff.
Apr 26, 2011 at 12:13 PM
- susweel
- Hall of Nepal
- Posts: 120,278
Originally posted by mayo49:Originally posted by valrod33:Originally posted by fakers23:Originally posted by Snider8706:Originally posted by valrod33:
Im confident in saying that the Niners will not draft Gabbert if he is there at 7
not even if peterson is gone?
Yeah... If Peterson gone.. I see us trading down..
this
That
If Peterson is gone the niners will draft Quinn or Prince.
book it
Apr 26, 2011 at 12:14 PM
- ninertico
- Veteran
- Posts: 10,259
Originally posted by susweel:Originally posted by mayo49:Originally posted by valrod33:Originally posted by fakers23:Originally posted by Snider8706:Originally posted by valrod33:
Im confident in saying that the Niners will not draft Gabbert if he is there at 7
not even if peterson is gone?
Yeah... If Peterson gone.. I see us trading down..
this
That
If Peterson is gone the niners will draft Quinn or Prince.
book it
You are right, sir...after trading down.
