I think RB's tend to hit the ground running, WR's take time, and QB's should show you something right from the start that says they can play. TE's generally do well quickly.
O-linemen generally take a year in the wieght room as well as an understanding of what to do when they hear a call.
RB & TE's trump olinemen so one up for the skilled positions.
Your thoughts?
There are 305 users in the forums
Skill position players vs. O-linemen, who developes quicker?
Feb 18, 2010 at 3:15 PM
- glorydayz
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,455
Feb 19, 2010 at 7:21 AM
- English
- Moderator
- Posts: 40,230
Wot?
Feb 19, 2010 at 2:18 PM
- fandemonium
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,790
Originally posted by glorydayz:
I think RB's tend to hit the ground running, WR's take time, and QB's should show you something right from the start that says they can play. TE's generally do well quickly.
O-linemen generally take a year in the wieght room as well as an understanding of what to do when they hear a call.
RB & TE's trump olinemen so one up for the skilled positions.
Your thoughts?
RBs tend to hit the ground running
WRs take time to catch on
QBs are a throw of the dice
OL can be pushed into it quickly
Feb 19, 2010 at 2:25 PM
- Overkill
- Moderator
- Posts: 10,805
Originally posted by fandemonium:Originally posted by glorydayz:
I think RB's tend to hit the ground running, WR's take time, and QB's should show you something right from the start that says they can play. TE's generally do well quickly.
O-linemen generally take a year in the wieght room as well as an understanding of what to do when they hear a call.
RB & TE's trump olinemen so one up for the skilled positions.
Your thoughts?
RBs tend to hit the ground running
WRs take time to catch on
QBs are a throw of the dice
OL can be pushed into it quickly
TE's are generally a little behind
Feb 19, 2010 at 5:22 PM
- SonocoNinerFan
- Veteran
- Posts: 17,581
The skill guys won't do jack behind a crap o-line.