Originally posted by Hawaii49erfan:Originally posted by mayo63:Originally posted by TheRatMan13:Originally posted by mayo63:Originally posted by TheRatMan13:Originally posted by PatrickJira411:
I would take Spiller if he was available at 13. I would LOVE Bulaga at 16 or 17
Agreed. If Spiller is there at 13, he better be the pick. He is a game changer on offense and defense. He reminds me of Chris Johnson out of the backfield, and he can return with the best of 'em.
If I am Singletary, here is how I go about bulstering the offense:
- Do whatever it takes to get Logan Mankins in FA.
- If Spiller is there at 13, take him.
- Draft the best tackle available with 16.
Of course, the likelihood of all that happening isnt very high, but those three moves would immediately make it a successful offsesason.
The only thing bad about your scenerio is that Seattle would more than likely if they don't take a Tackle at #6 will take one at #14 leaving us with the 4th or 5th best tackle at #16. That's why I think we need to take our tackle at #13 and Spiller should still be available at #16. I agree, though that Logan Mankins would look good in a Niner uniform.
Yeah a lot is going to be dictated by what Seattle does at 6. Let's say they draft a tackle at 6, I bet they would target a player like Spiller with 14. They literally have no game changing players on their offense.
If they take a tackle at #6 then take Spiller at #13 and get our RT at #16. I thinks that's probably the way they go unless they take a Qb at #6.
I think after the combine watching spillers blazing speed seattle takes him at #6 and then goes tackle at #14
That would freaking suck. If they actually got a running game and an OLine that might put them back in contention if Hasselbeck returns to form.