Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 1,308 users in the forums

Posts in the last 24 hours

 

Originally posted by Since07:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Since07:
Originally posted by Pillbusta:
Let's get more pressure on the QB and get more disruptive up front if we can and call it a day

Mack or bust, no way Raiders trade us Maxx

Imo that's the only real big "all in" moves SF would make…Maxx.

Harbs is gonna be a stubborn a*****e and keep Mack…unless Mack just doesn't want to get moved and finish up his time in LA to retire.

The Raiders have a history of refusing to trade with us. It's a massive rivalry and we just beat them.

People keep saying this but they're not in Oakland anymore. What rivalry?

 

Niner Talk » 49ers Trade News & Realistic Targets 2026

  • FL9r
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 21,290
The cheerleaders are the best part of that franchise. Thunderstruck baby! That's what the boys will be on Sunday. Ass whipping incoming.. if we don't trounce them something horrible happened.

 

Niner Talk » San Francisco 49ers @ Dallas Cowboys - WEEK 10

  • FL9r
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 21,290
Out for dallas. We have the best part time help in the nfl. Evans, bosa and deebo. The thing with Mike is not when is he coming back it's how long will he stay…. How many complete games will he actually play this year? Na, we don't need a receiver, he will be fine, just rest him…. Last I checked resting more than playing doesn't really help the team that much but sure let's all buy into the idea of him staying healthy for the stretch run. I mean the past never predicts the future right and Achilles injuries are fine with rest… a lot of rest.. we are fine, no problemo.

 

Niner Talk » 49ers sign WR Mike Evans

  • FL9r
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 21,290
Originally posted by Typecast:
Originally posted by Since07:
Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
im just getting at when/if the 13m gets awarded, the credit hits. Payment/non-payment doesn't stop the credit

I'm aware. I'm saying the people saying this have yet to provide any substantive evidence that it is true, and the CBA says credit is given when the refund is received (not awarded).

The NFL/CBA couldn't garnish Aiyuk's future earnings to pay the 13M?
He's been paid over 48M so far. He'll cut a check for whatever the system arbiter ultimately decides. Then he'll claim the payback on his taxes to get back the taxable portion.

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
I see that you're just following a perfect scenario where there are no issues with getting the money back and since you can't find any other verbiage when things aren't as clean (can't get actual funds) so it can't be true, right?

I never suggested or even implied there wouldn't be issues getting the money back. I would bet there will be, but I do that with no knowledge of Aiyuk's account balances and/or willingness to return money as part of a settlement (or arbitration/court ruling).

I'm not deducing what the rule is based on the ease of which the 49ers might get a refund. I'm just reading the CBA.
im just getting at when/if the 13m gets awarded, the credit hits. Payment/non-payment doesn't stop the credit
No. Whenever Aiyuk pays back the team, they'll receive credit on future salary cap after that. So if he cuts a check tomorrow, we won't see the credit until 2027.

Originally posted by jakedogg:
You folks are missing something(again). Why is the NFL so quick to reinstate him and then give the 49ERS TWO WEEKS to figure it out? Goodell is a coward-passing the buck. Give them 24 hours to trade him or 2 weeks to cut him while denying him just 2 weeks of paychecks. That first 'meeting' was held in the 49ers 'business office' away from the practice field. I wouldn't suggest anything but if Aiyuk were to get 'injured' at the practice facility during the meeting don't you think the lawyers would have to get involved? If I were a 49er employee I'd let it leak that they were afraid he'd bring in a gun to the meeting-tit for tat. Doesn't have to be true but it's the gamesmanship we don't need.

Goodell supposedly represents the owners. What Aiyuk is trying to get away with is something that concerns all the owners who are afraid to admit it. They then put it in the 49ers court thereby sweeping it under the rug. Goodell is not the only coward here. It's the rest of the owners who are afraid of the players who are their bread and butter.
Goodell isn't passing the buck. Reinstatement is ADMINISTRATIVE. All Aiyuk does is file the paperwork and the league processes it. This is all standard enforcement of contract mechanisms outlined by the CBA. Yes, Goodell has final say. The only thing Goodell can actually do is punish Aiyuk for is the outstanding warrant, but that is for a traffic infraction that the league doesn't normally punish.

The owners agreed to the CBA they negotiated with the players/NFLPA.

If I were a 49er employee I'd let it leak that they were afraid he'd bring in a gun to the meeting-tit for tat.

A couple pages back I talked about weirdos fantasizing things. Manufacturing violent threats is a prime example. It's not like people of color don't face fake accusations like this that put them in danger by trigger happy cops. The league would be forced to investigate because they have a zero-tolerance gun policy. It also opens up the team to libel/defamation and tortious interference.
Totally unacceptable and agreed.

 

Niner Talk » Brandon Aiyuk is a Quitter! Pick #25, 2020 NFL Draft

  • FL9r
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 21,290
No more trades for us. There are no more former players wanting to come back so lynch folded up shop. He is too busy figuring out the mess he created with resigning a guy who wanted out… BA distraction strikes again. Back to street scrub shopping and practice squad shifting for our beloved GM.

 

Niner Talk » 49ers Trade News & Realistic Targets 2026

Mack might cost a 3rd+ we are vying with the Bears.

 

Niner Talk » 49ers Trade News & Realistic Targets 2026

  • DrEll
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 21,290
Originally posted by Since07:
Originally posted by Pillbusta:
We won't need Evans until SEA unless MIN gets a QB real soon

This is what I was thinking Seattle @ 49ers might end up the battle for the west. I'm not afraid of the Vikings but we can't let Seattle have home field advantage in the playoffs

Lose to Dallas and Minnesota and all of a sudden the Seahawks game might be for the division. Can't take any week for granted. If can play bring him back ASAP.

 

Niner Talk » 49ers sign WR Mike Evans

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Since07:
Originally posted by Pillbusta:
Let's get more pressure on the QB and get more disruptive up front if we can and call it a day

Mack or bust, no way Raiders trade us Maxx

Imo that's the only real big "all in" moves SF would make…Maxx.

Harbs is gonna be a stubborn a*****e and keep Mack…unless Mack just doesn't want to get moved and finish up his time in LA to retire.

The Raiders have a history of refusing to trade with us. It's a massive rivalry and we just beat them.

 

Niner Talk » 49ers Trade News & Realistic Targets 2026

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Vikings are gonna trade for Kirk

Kirk can't throw past 50 yards not sure if he'd be the answer

 

Niner Talk » 49ers Trade News & Realistic Targets 2026

Originally posted by Since07:
Originally posted by Pillbusta:
Let's get more pressure on the QB and get more disruptive up front if we can and call it a day

Mack or bust, no way Raiders trade us Maxx

Imo that's the only real big "all in" moves SF would make…Maxx.

Harbs is gonna be a stubborn a*****e and keep Mack…unless Mack just doesn't want to get moved and finish up his time in LA to retire.

 

Niner Talk » 49ers Trade News & Realistic Targets 2026

Originally posted by Sask49erFan:
Originally posted by Since07:
Complete nonsense lol the 6-2 Vikings trading their superstar WR is ridiculous let alone to an NFC contender. I'm not into spending big on WR with reinforcements fast approaching. That being said "hypothetically" Jettas would be one I'd be willing to break the bank for

They are the worst 6-2 team in recent history. That offense is non functional and had wins over TB, Miami, New Orleans and Indy. Not exactly a death row of teams

They have GB and SF coming up so most likely will be 6-4 and behind CHI, DET and GB in that division.

If their GM was realistic he would know they don't stand a chance with that offense and will look to add picks so they can find a QB in a deep QB draft .

Vikings are gonna trade for Kirk

 

Niner Talk » 49ers Trade News & Realistic Targets 2026

Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
I would take Dallas Goedert at this point.

Goedert can't even move. He's toast man

 

Niner Talk » 49ers Trade News & Realistic Targets 2026

Originally posted by Sask49erFan:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by AJinUT:
Jags are going for it but they have a solid core and are average in age around 26.8. We however want the old and former elite prone to breaking.

They just traded for two 30 yr old players…one that plays one of the least impactful positions in football and a 2 down run defender…WTF are ya'll jealous about?

They are already loaded at every other position and their GM did what good GM's do. They shored up their two weakest positions with All Pro players

They're not loaded everywhere else lol. I would argue their WR position is not loaded, their TE is not anything special, backup RT, I don't know who plays LBer for them, and their CB room is loaded.

they overspent for a S and gave up way too much for a 2 down DT with a massive contract. Good on them for trading to trade. I would like SF to make another move BUT not because of the freaking Jags.

 

Niner Talk » 49ers Trade News & Realistic Targets 2026

There's no way that Minessota will trade their best player to a direct competitor in the NFC (yes, I know, the Haley trade ). So we can forget about Jefferson. They will trade for some journeyman QB and limp towards the playoffs.

The Jets are under a lot of pressure to trade people out, and I don't think we have the ammunition even with two first round picks (one definitely in the high 20s or low 30s since we're doing so well) will do it, and throwing in Mac (which is a stupid reckless move in itself) won't do it even considering he's on an expiring contract and they could simply try to get him in FA if they fancied him. So, Wilson is almost certainly not possible either.

I don't think D****s is trading Pickens, certainly not to us, and certainly not the same week we play them in their place.

IF the Raiders are holding out for two firsts for Crosby then it should be a no brainer for us. But that's obviously an IF. Such is a move that would move the needle and the WR issue might be patched with yet another superannuated ex-star (say, Allen).

On achievable WR help if we only trade for this position, the obvious name is Downs, since Indy is on a firesale. The fabled third round pick they ask for is not the end of the world considering that we hope that it will be in the 90s. Sure, you can get Warners there, but you can also get Cameron Lattes (how can Starbucks not see the obvious marketing opportunity for a seasonal product?). The question is not the price,it is whether the player is actually any good. I think he is, mostly because he does separate well, though his recurrent bouts with the dropsies are scary.

I would be disappointed if Lynch utters the dreaded phrase "We like who we have in the building" tonight. We've got to do something better than street FAs though, since the going injury rate seems to be 2-3 starters per game.

 

Niner Talk » 49ers Trade News & Realistic Targets 2026

Originally posted by Pillbusta:
We won't need Evans until SEA unless MIN gets a QB real soon

This is what I was thinking Seattle @ 49ers might end up the battle for the west. I'm not afraid of the Vikings but we can't let Seattle have home field advantage in the playoffs

 

Niner Talk » 49ers sign WR Mike Evans

 

Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone