Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 473 users in the forums

***General NBA Discussion Thread***

  • crzy
  • Hall of Fame
  • Posts: 40,285
Privately, owners saying union left impression they would accept 50-50 if system issues were resolved, and that's why NBA returned to talks.




jeez they haven't even settled the bri split. Everythign else seems miniscule relative to that.

I understand why the players don't want stringent luxury tax restrictions or age limits, but those should be secondary issues.
[ Edited by crzy on Oct 28, 2011 at 4:35 PM ]
Heard some bad news today.

Apparently the league said that they were prepared to make a financial move before the last collective bargaining session, which is what led to all the optimism. Well, apparently their "financial move" was this:

1) 50/50 and the owners get everything they want on system issues. (de facto hard cap)
2) 47/53 in favor of the owners and the players win some concessions, basically meaning that there's a more punitive luxury tax, but not completely prohibitive for luxury tax playing teams.

If that's true, the sides aren't all that close, IMO.
  • crzy
  • Hall of Fame
  • Posts: 40,285
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
Heard some bad news today.

Apparently the league said that they were prepared to make a financial move before the last collective bargaining session, which is what led to all the optimism. Well, apparently their "financial move" was this:

1) 50/50 and the owners get everything they want on system issues. (de facto hard cap)
2) 47/53 in favor of the owners and the players win some concessions, basically meaning that there's a more punitive luxury tax, but not completely prohibitive for luxury tax playing teams.

If that's true, the sides aren't all that close, IMO.


That sucks.

The Players should just take option 1. The BRI split is more important than anythign else.

Deal with the hard cap.
Originally posted by crzy:
That sucks.

The Players should just take option 1. The BRI split is more important than anythign else.

Deal with the hard cap.

I don't know. If I was making millions of dollars, I'd probably be okay with taking a little less money in exchange for the freedom to play where I want to. From what I understand, the players are more flexible on the BRI (heck, they've already dropped 5 points), but the system is more important to them.
Upon hearing this news, I think the owners' end game is to wait to see how the players react to missing checks, which starts happening on 11/15. If the players hold firm after that, we might see some movement on the owner's side.
  • crzy
  • Hall of Fame
  • Posts: 40,285
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
Originally posted by crzy:
That sucks.

The Players should just take option 1. The BRI split is more important than anythign else.

Deal with the hard cap.

I don't know. If I was making millions of dollars, I'd probably be okay with taking a little less money in exchange for the freedom to play where I want to. From what I understand, the players are more flexible on the BRI (heck, they've already dropped 5 points), but the system is more important to them.


But the current luxury tax system is already a huge deterrent to most teams from spending money.

Taking the next step to a hard cap, how much more of an effect will that have on player salaries?

And I don't think a hard cap will literally ever happen. It will probably just be a more stringent luxury tax.
  • TX9R
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 8,352
Originally posted by dobo:
Who cares, really? Maybe these jerkoffs (on both sides) need to lose some money. Cancel the season.

This
The Heat's owner is awesome. He should tweet more. "f**k a half mil, here's my dis on Robert Sarver, son!"
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
The Heat's owner is awesome. He should tweet more. "f**k a half mil, here's my dis on Robert Sarver, son!"

lulzwut
Appears that Hunter is looking out for himself more than anything. This pisses me off.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_yl..._hunter_110111

http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/216268/Report_Hunter_Trying_To_Smear_Fisher_As_Sellout_To_NBA
[ Edited by Hoovtrain on Nov 1, 2011 at 5:13 PM ]
  • crzy
  • Hall of Fame
  • Posts: 40,285
Hunter was always going to be the fall guy when the players got destroyed in this labor deal.

Either way he gets his salary, right?


Honestly, this entire lockout was preordained. The players were destined to lose. They had no chance of winning.
[ Edited by crzy on Nov 1, 2011 at 10:33 PM ]
That Woj piece is horsecrap. He's good sometimes, but his work is trashy way too often.
The more days this lockout goes on it just gets closer to the day when the Kings win the championship...







Basically im saying the season will be canceled
[ Edited by marshniners24 on Nov 2, 2011 at 1:58 AM ]
  • crzy
  • Hall of Fame
  • Posts: 40,285
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
That Woj piece is horsecrap. He's good sometimes, but his work is trashy way too often.

Based on?

Sounds logical to me.

Woj gets carried away in his op eds but he's still mostly on point.
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
That Woj piece is horsecrap. He's good sometimes, but his work is trashy way too often.

Possibly, but I've never really found his work to be all that trashy.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone