Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 642 users in the forums

College Football 2010-2011

Originally posted by Juradon:
Have to agree with Boise State President Bob Kustra. The big schools regularly schedule smaller conferences and NON BCS schools to play, and they will have two or three on their schedules. Then if you consider that not all teams in the BCS and SEC are that great. Granted sometimes teams in the SEC will face 2 or 3 teams in a row that will be tough. But Kustra's point is that it is a lie, to act like they have a murders row each and every weak. Hey Alabama scheduled San Jose St to play in Alabama! Not Boise St.

I don't think anyone who knows football would think that Reno rated at #18 are the sisters of the poor. Actually in a funny way TCU and Boise St are helping to SPREAD the money around to smaller conferences everytime they get in the BCS bowl games. It's the money that the big schools want to go to them. They want the Boise St and TCU's with no budget, it only helps to keep them out.

Boise St will play it's 3rd ranked team of the season in Reno. They will be going for their 25th game in a row. So looking at the full body of work, Boise has the credentials to play in any bowl game. Any long winning streak SHOULD be considered in any poll. I know they don't do it but they should.

The worst culprit of hurting the non-AQ's aren't the BCS or Big 6 schools, it's the preseason rankings.

Every year, the SEC gets 5-6 teams, Big 10 & 12 get 4, Pac-10 gets 3-4, ACC gets 2-3, Big East gets 1-2, and maybe 1-2 non-AQ gets a #20 preseason ranking.

Those 6 SEC teams get the I-AA and lameduck bottom feeders for their first 3 games, so not only do they move up, but when they play against each other, their resume looks like they played 5 ranked opponents, which gives them the inside track to play in the NC.

At least the Big 10, Big 12, and Pac-10 try to play the upper tier teams of each conference not named the SEC. MWC played against some of the better Pac-10 and Big 10 teams and won, top 3 WAC teams played some of the better teams (USC, Oregon St, VaTech, Cal, Wisconsin, etc).

Need to get rid of the preseason poll and start ranking after the 2nd week, so to force the big schools to play better preseason games. Now, don't get me wrong, I don't mind if an OSU, LSU, or Michigan play a I-AA squad, but only play one, not 3 in a row before league play.

One of my favorite games is watching the Bill Walsh Classic (Stanford vs San Jose St.) b/c there's history, granted Stanford is waaaaaaaaaaaaay more talented, but then standford goes and starts playing teams like Wake Forest(when scheduled, Wake was a top 3 ACC team) and Notre Dame (Notre Dame is always a challenge due to rivalry).
  • Hopper
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 12,380
Bama came to play.
Originally posted by vrabbit:
Newton looking average vs an NFL like D on the big stage, for all the Newton lovers that want the 9ers to draft this guy

Average is putting it nicely.
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
Originally posted by vrabbit:
Newton looking average vs an NFL like D on the big stage, for all the Newton lovers that want the 9ers to draft this guy

Average is putting it nicely.

Originally posted by vrabbit:
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
Originally posted by vrabbit:
Newton looking average vs an NFL like D on the big stage, for all the Newton lovers that want the 9ers to draft this guy

Average is putting it nicely.


He just got lucky, that last ball should've been picked but the defender decided to be a retard and overrun it.
So if Alabama wins this would they leapfrog everyone, or would Boise st. move to #2, assuming they beat Nevada?
Originally posted by blunt_probe:
So if Alabama wins this would they leapfrog everyone, or would Boise st. move to #2, assuming they beat Nevada?

not a chance in hell with 2 losses

though I've seen it happen in my NCAA Football video game
Well it is 28-27 Auburn with 1 minute left.
It's over. This backup QB sucks even more.
Originally posted by vrabbit:

No kidding. What a comeback.

And by no means do I know anything about the draft, but would I be correct in assuming that Nick Fairley is a future 1st round pick? He's a beast.
Originally posted by vrabbit:
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
Originally posted by vrabbit:
Newton looking average vs an NFL like D on the big stage, for all the Newton lovers that want the 9ers to draft this guy

Average is putting it nicely.


What quarter was this post made in?
Originally posted by teeohh:
Originally posted by vrabbit:
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
Originally posted by vrabbit:
Newton looking average vs an NFL like D on the big stage, for all the Newton lovers that want the 9ers to draft this guy

Average is putting it nicely.


What quarter was this post made in?

I still say Newton wasn't that good this game...he had one good play on getting the 1st down on 4th and inches, but outside of that, it was the outside reach plays and bad safety play by Bama that got the Auburn offense going.

The biggest surprise (outside of a 24-0 lead being lost....not a bama fan, more of a "I want 2 Pac-10 teams in BCS bowls" kinda guy) had to be how Auburn's defense stepped up and took out two future 1st round running backs, a 1st round WR in Jones, and sacked the QB 5 times, including the last one that make McElroy think he was Lois Lane after a quickie from Superman, lol
Originally posted by Crazy49er1313:
Originally posted by Juradon:
Have to agree with Boise State President Bob Kustra. The big schools regularly schedule smaller conferences and NON BCS schools to play, and they will have two or three on their schedules. Then if you consider that not all teams in the BCS and SEC are that great. Granted sometimes teams in the SEC will face 2 or 3 teams in a row that will be tough. But Kustra's point is that it is a lie, to act like they have a murders row each and every weak. Hey Alabama scheduled San Jose St to play in Alabama! Not Boise St.

I don't think anyone who knows football would think that Reno rated at #18 are the sisters of the poor. Actually in a funny way TCU and Boise St are helping to SPREAD the money around to smaller conferences everytime they get in the BCS bowl games. It's the money that the big schools want to go to them. They want the Boise St and TCU's with no budget, it only helps to keep them out.

Boise St will play it's 3rd ranked team of the season in Reno. They will be going for their 25th game in a row. So looking at the full body of work, Boise has the credentials to play in any bowl game. Any long winning streak SHOULD be considered in any poll. I know they don't do it but they should.

The worst culprit of hurting the non-AQ's aren't the BCS or Big 6 schools, it's the preseason rankings.

Every year, the SEC gets 5-6 teams, Big 10 & 12 get 4, Pac-10 gets 3-4, ACC gets 2-3, Big East gets 1-2, and maybe 1-2 non-AQ gets a #20 preseason ranking.

Those 6 SEC teams get the I-AA and lameduck bottom feeders for their first 3 games, so not only do they move up, but when they play against each other, their resume looks like they played 5 ranked opponents, which gives them the inside track to play in the NC.

At least the Big 10, Big 12, and Pac-10 try to play the upper tier teams of each conference not named the SEC. MWC played against some of the better Pac-10 and Big 10 teams and won, top 3 WAC teams played some of the better teams (USC, Oregon St, VaTech, Cal, Wisconsin, etc).

Need to get rid of the preseason poll and start ranking after the 2nd week, so to force the big schools to play better preseason games. Now, don't get me wrong, I don't mind if an OSU, LSU, or Michigan play a I-AA squad, but only play one, not 3 in a row before league play.

One of my favorite games is watching the Bill Walsh Classic (Stanford vs San Jose St.) b/c there's history, granted Stanford is waaaaaaaaaaaaay more talented, but then standford goes and starts playing teams like Wake Forest(when scheduled, Wake was a top 3 ACC team) and Notre Dame (Notre Dame is always a challenge due to rivalry).

Bama played #18 Penn State and beat them 24-3.
LSU played #18 UNC.
Florida plays Florida State.
Auburn didn't play a tough schedule out of conference, but they played South Carolina, Alabama, LSU, Arkansas, Mississippi State, etc. That's #6, 9, 12, 18 and 25.

There's a reason the SEC keeps winning the national championship games. They're better. They play tougher teams.

Boise State has a cupcake schedule. Yes, that's because nobody will play against them. Why would a team with an already tough schedule play against Boise State, and risk losing? If the "elite" team wins, nobody cares, because they were supposed to. If Boise State wins, the "elite" team just validated them. It's a competition, so there's no reason for a team to help Boise State. There's no win for the elite team playing Boise State.
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
Originally posted by vrabbit:

No kidding. What a comeback.

And by no means do I know anything about the draft, but would I be correct in assuming that Nick Fairley is a future 1st round pick? He's a beast.

Fairley was huge today again. Kiper has him #6 on his big board and Scouts has him rated 9th. It seems pretty obvious that he will be a top 10 pick in next years draft.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone