The Official 2010 Notre Dame Fighting Irish Football Thread | Page 4

Sep 11, 2010 at 4:46 PM

#46

SoCold
Hall of Dumb
Posts: 127,795

Originally posted by WestCoast:
WOW

95 yards

502 yards

Sep 18, 2010 at 8:22 AM

#47

evil
Veteran
Posts: 45,780

Originally posted by IWASATTHECATCH:
Originally posted by KRS-1:

Sep 18, 2010 at 5:41 PM

#48

AB81Rules
Veteran
Posts: 32,818

GO IRISH GO IRISH GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sep 18, 2010 at 8:50 PM

#49

global_nomad
Veteran
Posts: 14,827

wholey

sheeto

Sep 18, 2010 at 9:45 PM

#50

IWASATTHECATCH
Hall of Fame
Posts: 21,931

*sigh*

Sep 19, 2010 at 8:36 AM

#51

evil
Veteran
Posts: 45,780

The up tempo offense is killing me...or should I say the D. They were worn out in the 4th quarter. The run stopping also looked like the 2009 D was out on the field.

We had chances to out that game away or at least take a more commanding lead and didn't.

Floyd needs to do a better job protecting the football.

The play clock had actually expired before the ball was snapped on the last play of the game but not one official or even one ND coach noticed. No review. Screwed.

Sep 19, 2010 at 9:03 AM

#52

evil
Veteran
Posts: 45,780

From a Notre Dame MB (a member emailed the Big East D.O.F Terry McAulay) :

Quote:
Letter from Big East director of officiating

We have reviewed the play. ESPN computed the time between zero and snap to be no more than .133 seconds which would not be an extended period of time. We will be releasing a statement on this later today explaining the mechanics of this play. Thank you for you note.

Terry McAulay

Sep 19, 2010 at 9:40 AM

#53

Kolohe
Hall of Fame
Posts: 59,927

Originally posted by KRS-1:

From a Notre Dame MB (a member emailed the Big East D.O.F Terry McAulay) :

Quote:
Letter from Big East director of officiating

We have reviewed the play. ESPN computed the time between zero and snap to be no more than .133 seconds which would not be an extended period of time. We will be releasing a statement on this later today explaining the mechanics of this play. Thank you for you note.

Terry McAulay

Yup that was a big Eff up by the refs!!!! It definitely should've been a 51 yard attempt.

Sep 19, 2010 at 9:46 AM

#54

evil
Veteran
Posts: 45,780

Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by KRS-1:

From a Notre Dame MB (a member emailed the Big East D.O.F Terry McAulay) :

Quote:
Letter from Big East director of officiating

We have reviewed the play. ESPN computed the time between zero and snap to be no more than .133 seconds which would not be an extended period of time. We will be releasing a statement on this later today explaining the mechanics of this play. Thank you for you note.

Terry McAulay

Yup that was a big Eff up by the refs!!!! It definitely should've been a 51 yard attempt.

Don't get me wrong...we had chances to take a more commanding lead but failed. We also shot ourselves in the foot with the up tempo offense...couldn't stop the run all day long and by the 4th quarter the D was worn out because the offense didn't help keep the D on the sidelines long enough to get rested.

Sep 19, 2010 at 3:11 PM

#55

Negrodamus
Veteran
Posts: 13,775

Originally posted by KRS-1:

From a Notre Dame MB (a member emailed the Big East D.O.F Terry McAulay) :

Quote:
Letter from Big East director of officiating

We have reviewed the play. ESPN computed the time between zero and snap to be no more than .133 seconds which would not be an extended period of time. We will be releasing a statement on this later today explaining the mechanics of this play. Thank you for you note.

Terry McAulay

per ESPN; such a ballsy call that

Mark Dantonio OK after heart attack

Sep 22, 2010 at 9:39 AM

#56

lamontb
Veteran
Posts: 30,033

Problem for Notre Dame just like Michigan is that they have to out score folks every week b/c the defense is just terrible. Can't do that with turnovers.

Denard

Sep 22, 2010 at 3:35 PM

#57