Originally posted by Brazilian49er:Originally posted by vrabbit:Originally posted by Crazy49er1313:
Devil's Advocate Time
If, and I mean if hell freezes over and a white guy wins a dunk contest in the NBA, England loses, is that a good thing for the US or is it bad?
Pro:
- England basically eliminated
- Only have to beat Algeria to advance
Con:
- Gives confidence to Algeria to advance
- Home-field advantage to Algeria
Thoughts?
I've said it before and I'll say it again.
The BEST case scenerio for USA is for this game to end 0-0, and then
Slovenia 4pts, +1GD (1st tie breaker), 3 GS (2nd tie breaker)
USA 2pts, 0GD, 3GS
England 2pts, 0GD, 1GS
Algeria, 1pt, -1GD, 0GS
if that were too happen, just a 1-0 win over Algeria would get USA into the 2nd round. They would have 5pts, +1, 4GS at worst, and no scenario in the England/Slovenia would keep them from advancing.
The US can advance even with a tie. They will have to root for England to either lose or tie with the same amount (or with 1 more) of goals.
Example: US 0-0 Algeria
They're in if: England 0-0 or 1-1 Slovenia. If it's 2-2, US is out due to number of goals suffered.
i still don't get it. in that scenerio both england and the us have 3 goals for and 3 goals against.


for Algeria
