Originally posted by LA9erFan:Originally posted by SacRock14:Originally posted by crzy:Originally posted by SacRock14:Originally posted by crzy:
Lebron going to New York would be stupid. He'd have to start over to win there.
David Lee and Danilo Gallinari won't win a him a ring.
How much better off is Cleveland minus LeBron than NYK?
Better yes, but nothing the Knicks couldn't reach in short time.
Mo Williams-Varejao-Shaq-A.Parker-Ilgauskas
Duhon-David Lee-Gallinari-W.Chandler-Hughes
You could pretty much plug LeBron in anywhere and that team is ready to roll.
Cavs players are much better defensively and Mo Williams is better than any guard on the Knicks roster.
Mo Williams might be better than any player on the Knicks, but that's not saying a whole lot. You put LeBron on that team and they could attract just about any free agent.
And David Lee and Chandler are solid/good defenders. Duhon holds his own. Hughes is washed up, but he used to rack up the steals. Again, LeBron would make them all look better.
LeBron's never made any player look better, IMO. He has the ball in his hands so much and isn't very good off of the ball, so the only guys that do well next to him are spot up shooters or hustle/defensive guys. Players have to fit LeBron, not vice versa. This is one of the main reasons I think that Kobe's still the better player.
While I agree Kobe is a better player than LeBron I could have sworn during last season you had said LeBron was now the better player but I could be wrong or confusing you with someone else.
