There are 299 users in the forums
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
How about this. Every time a team interviews a DC or OC and doesn't hire them, they have to give up their lowest round pick in the upcoming draft. How about that? Because what's happening is total BS.
That's not really workable but the process shouldn't be frictionless for teams who cant grow their own.
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
How about this. Every time a team interviews a DC or OC and doesn't hire them, they have to give up their lowest round pick in the upcoming draft. How about that? Because what's happening is total BS.
That's not really workable but the process shouldn't be frictionless for teams who cant grow their own.
Originally posted by qnnhan7:
The Shanahan coaching tree becoming very impressive. Budding Gary Kubiak tree.
Originally posted by TopDogBerkeley:
If the rumors of Klint to Las Vegas are true, then we are officially on Klay watch. Will 49ers allow him to leave for Las Vegas? Does Mick Lombardi move up to be the non-play calling OC?
Originally posted by English:
Originally posted by TopDogBerkeley:
If the rumors of Klint to Las Vegas are true, then we are officially on Klay watch. Will 49ers allow him to leave for Las Vegas? Does Mick Lombardi move up to be the non-play calling OC?
Why should we let him leave on a non-promotion transfer?
Originally posted by jcs:
Wouldn't he be calling plays in Vegas?....something he can't do here.
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by jcs:
Wouldn't he be calling plays in Vegas?....something he can't do here.
Why would the Raiders hire Klay only for him to not call plays. Hell even Mike LaFleur will be calling plays for Arizona.
Originally posted by jcs:
To be the HC. Not a big fan of this evolution of HC's calling their own plays...it's not always the best way IMO and things can and do slip through the cracks that shouldn't.