49ers acquire Skyy Moore from KC Chiefs | Page 10

Aug 24, 2025 at 9:02 PM

Since07
Veteran
Posts: 4,729

Originally posted by Chance:
Dude, you're crying over the most trivial b******t.

I mean would you rather have a run stuffing DT that has started for 6 years or a PR with below average stats?

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
West will be back for week 1. I don't see a lot of point to signing vet minimum guys at this point,

Hopefully, he's looked solid for his selection but I'm not super confident he's going to come in and be consistent hopefully him and Collins figure it out sometime this season but I'm not counting on it. Might need to play Mykel more inside this year cause our IDL still looks terrible

The above videos are auto-populated by an affiliate.

Aug 24, 2025 at 9:05 PM

#137

9ers4eva
Veteran
Posts: 22,091

Thing is Nnadi is slated to be their 5th DT. I doubt they take snaps away from Lott for Nnadi.

Aug 24, 2025 at 9:18 PM

#138

Since07
Veteran
Posts: 4,729

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Thing is Nnadi is slated to be their 5th DT. I doubt they take snaps away from Lott for Nnadi.

He's not even listed on their depth chart yet

Are you looking at espns projection? They just traded for him, pretty sure they are going to see how he does in practice before placing him on the depth chart coming back from injury.

Aug 24, 2025 at 9:34 PM

#139

Chance
Veteran
Posts: 4,978

Originally posted by Since07:

Originally posted by Chance:
Dude, you're crying over the most trivial b******t.

I mean would you rather have a run stuffing DT that has started for 6 years or a PR with below average stats?

I'd rather trust our FO to fill the periphery of our roster how they see fit. It's such a silly thing to whine about.

Aug 24, 2025 at 9:52 PM

#140

Since07
Veteran
Posts: 4,729

Originally posted by Chance:
I'd rather trust our FO to fill the periphery of our roster how they see fit. It's such a silly thing to whine about.

So you would take a punt returner over a 6 year starting DT 😂 Only reason why they went to get skyy is because we have 6 WRs out. Its a temporary bandaid. Hes currently listed as our 3rd string returner and has a 58% catch rate.

If its so silly why are you "whining" about me "crying".

Aug 24, 2025 at 9:59 PM

#141

9ers4eva
Veteran
Posts: 22,091

Originally posted by Since07:
He's not even listed on their depth chart yet Are you looking at espns projection? They just traded for him, pretty sure they are going to see how he does in practice before placing him on the depth chart coming back from injury.

Pennell starter. 2nd rounder Lott. Nnadi.

Jones and Tillery at 3 tech.

[ Edited by 9ers4eva on Aug 24, 2025 at 9:59 PM ]

Aug 24, 2025 at 10:37 PM

#142

Chance
Veteran
Posts: 4,978

Originally posted by Since07:

Originally posted by Chance:
I'd rather trust our FO to fill the periphery of our roster how they see fit. It's such a silly thing to whine about.

So you would take a punt returner over a 6 year starting DT 😂 Only reason why they went to get skyy is because we have 6 WRs out. Its a temporary bandaid. Hes currently listed as our 3rd string returner and has a 58% catch rate. If its so silly why are you "whining" about me "crying".

Dunning-Kruger strikes again.

Aug 25, 2025 at 12:15 AM

#143

Since07
Veteran
Posts: 4,729

Originally posted by Chance:
Dunning-Kruger strikes again.

Idk trading for a proven 6 year run stopping veteran instead of a punt returner seems logical to me. All you have to say is I'm a whining cry baby with low IQ for making that speculation rather than give any sensible counter argument

Aug 25, 2025 at 3:21 AM

#144

ritz126
Veteran
Posts: 4,160

Originally posted by Since07:
Idk trading for a proven 6 year run stopping veteran instead of a punt returner seems logical to me. All you have to say is I'm a whining cry baby with low IQ for making that speculation rather than give any sensible counter argument

tbh ive never really head of anyone complaining about something like this it isnt a first round pick we have multiple 6th round picks

Aug 25, 2025 at 4:12 AM

#145

NYniner85
Veteran
Posts: 117,555

Originally posted by ritz126:

Originally posted by Since07:
Idk trading for a proven 6 year run stopping veteran instead of a punt returner seems logical to me. All you have to say is I'm a whining cry baby with low IQ for making that speculation rather than give any sensible counter argument

tbh ive never really head of anyone complaining about something like this it isnt a first round pick we have multiple 6th round picks

I just think Moore stinks regardless of who else they could have gotten.

they don't need more run stuffing DTs either, they need actual pass rushing IDL, we don't have a single one of those currently.

Aug 25, 2025 at 9:27 AM

#146

Chance
Veteran
Posts: 4,978

Originally posted by Since07:

Originally posted by Chance:
Dunning-Kruger strikes again.

Idk trading for a proven 6 year run stopping veteran instead of a punt returner seems logical to me. All you have to say is I'm a whining cry baby with low IQ for making that speculation rather than give any sensible counter argument

You're whining about a trade for an inconsequential late round pick swap. Perhaps we have a greater need at returner and WR depth than we do for an IDL. It's not rocket science. The needs of this roster dictate the moves that are made. Can we move on, or do you want to continue beating this dead horse?

Aug 25, 2025 at 9:59 AM

#147

49ers808
Veteran
Posts: 15,865

Originally posted by NYniner85:
I just think Moore stinks regardless of who else they could have gotten.

they don't need more run stuffing DTs either, they need actual pass rushing IDL, we don't have a single one of those currently.

Mykel Williams don't count?

Aug 25, 2025 at 10:51 AM

#148

NYniner85
Veteran
Posts: 117,555

Originally posted by 49ers808:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
I just think Moore stinks regardless of who else they could have gotten.

they don't need more run stuffing DTs either, they need actual pass rushing IDL, we don't have a single one of those currently.

Mykel Williams don't count?

He's a sub package interior rusher, he's not a 3 down DT who will only be rushing from the interior

We don't have that 290-330lb IDL who can rush from the inside consistently. I think it's a very underrated problem for this team right now

Aug 25, 2025 at 11:00 AM

#149

Patton
Veteran
Posts: 6,421

Originally posted by NYniner85:
I just think Moore stinks regardless of who else they could have gotten.

Facts.

Aug 25, 2025 at 11:37 PM

#150

Since07
Veteran
Posts: 4,729

Originally posted by ritz126:
tbh ive never really head of anyone complaining about something like this it isnt a first round pick we have multiple 6th round picks

I feel we dropped an entire round for someone who will likely be cut sometime this season in desperation due to multiple injuries. The "complaining" is me defending my point when everyone is saying "no big deal" Dropping an entire round for a bandaid I don't like even if it's later.

Originally posted by NYniner85:
I just think Moore stinks regardless of who else they could have gotten.

they don't need more run stuffing DTs either, they need actual pass rushing IDL, we don't have a single one of those currently.

Have you seen our depth and how our interior run defense has looked? I'd rather get a starting veteran DT even if it's depth than a below average PR that is "fast"