49ers vs. Titans Tickets Available! →

There are 222 users in the forums

49ers select Jordan Watkins-WR-Ole Miss with the 138th pick in the 2025 NFL Draft

Shop Find 49ers gear online
Originally posted by miked1978:
Originally posted by Koldo:
But what good is in having drafted multiple All-Pro players if, when they get old or injured, you don't really have a viable option to replace them?

This is kind of ridiculous to say. You are expecting a team to not only have a viable option at every position but also a viable option on the bench at every position.

Not ridiculous at all. Thats like saying the Niners should have never had Steve Young g on the bench behind Montana, or Aaron Rodger's on the bench behind Brett Favre….Hennessy behind Brendel lol.

It's far from "ridiculous" the expect a team to have secondary plans for injured starters even if the starters aren't hurt. Look at 96/97, T.O. was as talented or more than Rice at that point of their careers and Owens still didn't get as many opportunities because Jerry was still active and producing.

When you have the injury history that this team has, you better make sure you're looking at backups at every position to make sure you can maintain a certain level of success when your starters are out, which is going to happen.
That's not to say "every" position across the board needs that, but you sure as hell better have quality backups across both lines and your secondary.

As mentioned, who TF cares if you have all pros at every single position if they're only playing 3 games a season. Thats far from "dumb" or "ridiculous".
Originally posted by Patton:
Originally posted by miked1978:
Originally posted by Koldo:
But what good is in having drafted multiple All-Pro players if, when they get old or injured, you don't really have a viable option to replace them?

This is kind of ridiculous to say. You are expecting a team to not only have a viable option at every position but also a viable option on the bench at every position.

Not ridiculous at all. Thats like saying the Niners should have never had Steve Young g on the bench behind Montana, or Aaron Rodger's on the bench behind Brett Favre….Hennessy behind Brendel lol.

It's far from "ridiculous" the expect a team to have secondary plans for injured starters even if the starters aren't hurt. Look at 96/97, T.O. was as talented or more than Rice at that point of their careers and Owens still didn't get as many opportunities because Jerry was still active and producing.

When you have the injury history that this team has, you better make sure you're looking at backups at every position to make sure you can maintain a certain level of success when your starters are out, which is going to happen.
That's not to say "every" position across the board needs that, but you sure as hell better have quality backups across both lines and your secondary.

As mentioned, who TF cares if you have all pros at every single position if they're only playing 3 games a season. Thats far from "dumb" or "ridiculous".

It's dumb because you realistically can't have high level backups at every position lined up like that in this era.

Do the Chiefs have Travis Kelce 2.0 sitting in the wings? Do they have another Mahomes? Chris Jones 2.0?

49ers had Joe Staley and when he was ready to retire they brought in Trent Williams. There are some players you will eventually have to replace but you can't always replace with equal or better if the guys are HOF level players. It will be incredibly tough to replace George Kittle but they will. The replacement may not be as good but that says more about George than the teams inability to keep it going.

Fred Warner is being replaced due to injury. How many guys in the whole league are comparable replacements for Fred? Only so many guys at Bosa's level but the plan is clearly there to retool the whole DL.
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by Patton:
Originally posted by miked1978:
Originally posted by Koldo:
But what good is in having drafted multiple All-Pro players if, when they get old or injured, you don't really have a viable option to replace them?

This is kind of ridiculous to say. You are expecting a team to not only have a viable option at every position but also a viable option on the bench at every position.

Not ridiculous at all. Thats like saying the Niners should have never had Steve Young g on the bench behind Montana, or Aaron Rodger's on the bench behind Brett Favre….Hennessy behind Brendel lol.

It's far from "ridiculous" the expect a team to have secondary plans for injured starters even if the starters aren't hurt. Look at 96/97, T.O. was as talented or more than Rice at that point of their careers and Owens still didn't get as many opportunities because Jerry was still active and producing.

When you have the injury history that this team has, you better make sure you're looking at backups at every position to make sure you can maintain a certain level of success when your starters are out, which is going to happen.
That's not to say "every" position across the board needs that, but you sure as hell better have quality backups across both lines and your secondary.

As mentioned, who TF cares if you have all pros at every single position if they're only playing 3 games a season. Thats far from "dumb" or "ridiculous".

It's dumb because you realistically can't have high level backups at every position lined up like that in this era.

Do the Chiefs have Travis Kelce 2.0 sitting in the wings? Do they have another Mahomes? Chris Jones 2.0?

49ers had Joe Staley and when he was ready to retire they brought in Trent Williams. There are some players you will eventually have to replace but you can't always replace with equal or better if the guys are HOF level players. It will be incredibly tough to replace George Kittle but they will. The replacement may not be as good but that says more about George than the teams inability to keep it going.

Fred Warner is being replaced due to injury. How many guys in the whole league are comparable replacements for Fred? Only so many guys at Bosa's level but the plan is clearly there to retool the whole DL.

While I agree with you (mostly) I'd like to point out that Chris Jones has missed 7 games in 7 years. Travis Kelce has missed 7 games since 2013 and Patrick Mahomes has missed 2 games his entire career.
I guess there's a reason that they have become the dominant champions in the past (going on) decade.

Like I said, with *this* franchise and their putrid history of injuries, they shouldn't depend on having their star players because it hasn't happened in the Lynch/Kyle era. They should expect that every player that has a history of missing games, is just going to continue to miss games going forward and draft for their backups and pay them based on games they have played.
Originally posted by Patton:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by Patton:
Originally posted by miked1978:
Originally posted by Koldo:
But what good is in having drafted multiple All-Pro players if, when they get old or injured, you don't really have a viable option to replace them?

This is kind of ridiculous to say. You are expecting a team to not only have a viable option at every position but also a viable option on the bench at every position.

Not ridiculous at all. Thats like saying the Niners should have never had Steve Young g on the bench behind Montana, or Aaron Rodger's on the bench behind Brett Favre….Hennessy behind Brendel lol.

It's far from "ridiculous" the expect a team to have secondary plans for injured starters even if the starters aren't hurt. Look at 96/97, T.O. was as talented or more than Rice at that point of their careers and Owens still didn't get as many opportunities because Jerry was still active and producing.

When you have the injury history that this team has, you better make sure you're looking at backups at every position to make sure you can maintain a certain level of success when your starters are out, which is going to happen.
That's not to say "every" position across the board needs that, but you sure as hell better have quality backups across both lines and your secondary.

As mentioned, who TF cares if you have all pros at every single position if they're only playing 3 games a season. Thats far from "dumb" or "ridiculous".

It's dumb because you realistically can't have high level backups at every position lined up like that in this era.

Do the Chiefs have Travis Kelce 2.0 sitting in the wings? Do they have another Mahomes? Chris Jones 2.0?

49ers had Joe Staley and when he was ready to retire they brought in Trent Williams. There are some players you will eventually have to replace but you can't always replace with equal or better if the guys are HOF level players. It will be incredibly tough to replace George Kittle but they will. The replacement may not be as good but that says more about George than the teams inability to keep it going.

Fred Warner is being replaced due to injury. How many guys in the whole league are comparable replacements for Fred? Only so many guys at Bosa's level but the plan is clearly there to retool the whole DL.

While I agree with you (mostly) I'd like to point out that Chris Jones has missed 7 games in 7 years. Travis Kelce has missed 7 games since 2013 and Patrick Mahomes has missed 2 games his entire career.
I guess there's a reason that they have become the dominant champions in the past (going on) decade.

Like I said, with *this* franchise and their putrid history of injuries, they shouldn't depend on having their star players because it hasn't happened in the Lynch/Kyle era. They should expect that every player that has a history of missing games, is just going to continue to miss games going forward and draft for their backups and pay them based on games they have played.

Yes obviously staying healthy is critical to getting it done. No wonder our most dominant season was one of our healthiest...just needed it to last one more damn game!

But I do wonder how much of it is bad luck - if you think about it Bosa and Warner injuries were straight up crap luck. But also how much of it is the type of football we play? Not that I'm calling KC finesse but we all know the difference between Kittle and Kelce and how they play.

I always go back to the Lance trade - it cost us so much in hindsight. Forget the miss on Lance by himself but the move not only cost us valuable draft picks but also had us miss in a super talented draft class.

Jamar Chase, Penei Sewell, Pat Surtain, Micah Parsons, Rashawn Slater even guys like Jaycee Horn and Devonta Smith, Jaylen Waddle were there for us to grab instead of Trey. Obviously we made the move for a QB so it's extra hindsight worthy.

But we also made draft picks with Trey as the QB in mind - Trey Sermon, Aaron Banks, Danny Gray were all Lance related picks IMO. I don't think we draft them if we didn't draft Trey.

The move was clearly an overreaction and hurts us to this day. But they're still battling through it and the result could've been SO much worse if we didn't make it deep into the playoffs when giving away those first round picks or not being able to find Purdy.

I think we should look at the recent draft classes as where we may be heading and IMO they're still some of our best ones even if it's still too early to really say one way or another.
Originally posted by genus49:
Yes obviously staying healthy is critical to getting it done. No wonder our most dominant season was one of our healthiest...just needed it to last one more damn game!

But I do wonder how much of it is bad luck - if you think about it Bosa and Warner injuries were straight up crap luck. But also how much of it is the type of football we play? Not that I'm calling KC finesse but we all know the difference between Kittle and Kelce and how they play.

I always go back to the Lance trade - it cost us so much in hindsight. Forget the miss on Lance by himself but the move not only cost us valuable draft picks but also had us miss in a super talented draft class.

Jamar Chase, Penei Sewell, Pat Surtain, Micah Parsons, Rashawn Slater even guys like Jaycee Horn and Devonta Smith, Jaylen Waddle were there for us to grab instead of Trey. Obviously we made the move for a QB so it's extra hindsight worthy.

But we also made draft picks with Trey as the QB in mind - Trey Sermon, Aaron Banks, Danny Gray were all Lance related picks IMO. I don't think we draft them if we didn't draft Trey.

The move was clearly an overreaction and hurts us to this day. But they're still battling through it and the result could've been SO much worse if we didn't make it deep into the playoffs when giving away those first round picks or not being able to find Purdy.

I think we should look at the recent draft classes as where we may be heading and IMO they're still some of our best ones even if it's still too early to really say one way or another.

IMO you're exactly right with the reasoning of the injuries we've seen with this team. I know that they (coaching staff/management) have made attempts to address this injury problem but it hasn't helped. They need to change something within the way players are conditioned and trained inside the system.

There's absolutely no way a team is this unlucky when it comes to injuries. Even looking at it statistically it's just mind blowing that we've seen this level of missed games by injured players.

Something definitely has to change.
Originally posted by Patton:
Originally posted by miked1978:
Originally posted by Koldo:
But what good is in having drafted multiple All-Pro players if, when they get old or injured, you don't really have a viable option to replace them?

This is kind of ridiculous to say. You are expecting a team to not only have a viable option at every position but also a viable option on the bench at every position.

Not ridiculous at all. Thats like saying the Niners should have never had Steve Young g on the bench behind Montana, or Aaron Rodger's on the bench behind Brett Favre….Hennessy behind Brendel lol.

It's far from "ridiculous" the expect a team to have secondary plans for injured starters even if the starters aren't hurt. Look at 96/97, T.O. was as talented or more than Rice at that point of their careers and Owens still didn't get as many opportunities because Jerry was still active and producing.

When you have the injury history that this team has, you better make sure you're looking at backups at every position to make sure you can maintain a certain level of success when your starters are out, which is going to happen.
That's not to say "every" position across the board needs that, but you sure as hell better have quality backups across both lines and your secondary.

As mentioned, who TF cares if you have all pros at every single position if they're only playing 3 games a season. Thats far from "dumb" or "ridiculous".

You went from talking about All Pro HOF players to Jake Brendal

We do have viable options behind our starters. How the hell do yall think we are 5-3? It's ridiculous to expect anything more than a few wins considering the total amount of injuries we have. Take a look at the Ravens. They were one of the AFC's Super Bowl favorites and many people thought they had one of the most stacked rosters in the league. Everyone was raving about their draft class too. They look like trash since their all pro QB got hurt. Bengals too.

Not sure what you guys are expecting here. You b***h about not having a great oline but then when Purdy, Bosa, Warner, Aiyuk, Kittle go down you also b***h about not having pro bowl caliber backups. We are literally in unprecedented territory here with injuries. Not sure how any teams could survive this. Name one team that can lose their starting QB and their 2 best defensive players but still having a winning record. .
Originally posted by miked1978:
You went from talking about All Pro HOF players to Jake Brendal

Not sure what you guys are expecting here. You b***h about not having a great oline but then when Purdy, Bosa, Warner, Aiyuk, Kittle go down you also b***h about not having pro bowl caliber backups. We are literally in unprecedented territory here with injuries. Not sure how any teams could survive this. Name one team that can lose their starting QB and their 2 best defensive players but still having a winning record. .

You completely missed the point on Brendel.

Not exactly sure what not having addressed the OL has to do with non OL players getting hurt 🫤

You said it's "ridiculous" to want quality starters behind current starters. It's clearly not ridiculous because all those starters have long injury histories.
[ Edited by Patton on Oct 28, 2025 at 12:56 PM ]
  • Koldo
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 5,216
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
Originally posted by miked1978:
Originally posted by Koldo:
But what good is in having drafted multiple All-Pro players if, when they get old or injured, you don't really have a viable option to replace them?

This is kind of ridiculous to say. You are expecting a team to not only have a viable option at every position but also a viable option on the bench at every position.

Might be one of the most dumb comments he's ever posted and that says a lot

I can see that reading comprehension is not your strong suit, so here's the translation for you:

Originally posted by Koldo:
My point is if you miss on so many picks (like ShanaLynch have) you won't have a viable option to eventually replace your star aging players.

Don't thank me
Originally posted by Koldo:
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
Originally posted by miked1978:
Originally posted by Koldo:
But what good is in having drafted multiple All-Pro players if, when they get old or injured, you don't really have a viable option to replace them?

This is kind of ridiculous to say. You are expecting a team to not only have a viable option at every position but also a viable option on the bench at every position.

Might be one of the most dumb comments he's ever posted and that says a lot

I can see that reading comprehension is not your strong suit, so here's the translation for you:

Originally posted by Koldo:
My point is if you miss on so many picks (like ShanaLynch have) you won't have a viable option to eventually replace your star aging players.

Don't thank me

The Niners had a lot of those solid backups but they left in free agency for a chance to start elsewhere. Nearly every teams in the same spot the Niners are in. Players want to start and get paid more. No team can guarantee every player that he'll start. The Niners are fortunate to have a solid backup at QB. Many teams don't.
Really nice catch then he wasnt on the field anymore. I want to see more of him.
That was a real nice catch where he fought for the ball. Showed some toughness on that one.
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
That was a real nice catch where he fought for the ball. Showed some toughness on that one.

HE really needs to get more playing time.. and more target.. he looks like one of them BUCKEYES WRs when he plays..
Originally posted by _Goldblooded_:
Really nice catch then he wasnt on the field anymore. I want to see more of him.

it's scary.... Shanny used Gray and Cowing the same way... in.. out.. out.. in... then GONE !!

drafting those 2 were bad from the get go, but I believe Air Watson got some game..
Originally posted by 9moon:
Originally posted by _Goldblooded_:
Really nice catch then he wasnt on the field anymore. I want to see more of him.

it's scary.... Shanny used Gray and Cowing the same way... in.. out.. out.. in... then GONE !!

drafting those 2 were bad from the get go, but I believe Air Watson got some game..

Welcome to the doghouse.

Join the ranks of tonges, gurrendo, Lucas.

Come in ball out then get banished to the bench for eternity.

Expect the same for Hennessy as soon as Brendel's ready to start getting shoved back into Jones and purdys face again.
[ Edited by BoldRedandGold on Nov 2, 2025 at 9:44 PM ]
Originally posted by BoldRedandGold:
Originally posted by 9moon:
Originally posted by _Goldblooded_:
Really nice catch then he wasnt on the field anymore. I want to see more of him.

it's scary.... Shanny used Gray and Cowing the same way... in.. out.. out.. in... then GONE !!

drafting those 2 were bad from the get go, but I believe Air Watson got some game..

Welcome to the doghouse.

Join the ranks of tonges, gurrendo, Lucas.

Come in ball out then get banished to the bench for eternity.

Expect the same for Hennessy as soon as Brendel's ready to start getting shoved back into Jones and purdys face again.

This is how we get our stars injured one could argue. Overuse
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone