ALERT! It's Time to Change THAT LOGO!

(this is an image I made, nothing official).

I'd like to see something like this. It's the current logo with the gold ring removed. I prefer how the S layers over the F instead of cutting through it.

Originally posted by linkboy:

(this is an image I made, nothing official).

I'd like to see something like this. It's the current logo with the gold ring removed. I prefer how the S layers over the F instead of cutting through it.

nice. me personally i would lose the black and lose the red and lose the ovals

Originally posted by Young2Rice:

Originally posted by Niners99:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Was there a CHANGE in OWNERSHIP between 5 - 0 and 0 - 3 in the Super Bowl?

I mean, Eddie is the one who screwed up and lost the team. It stayed in the family, where he presumably still has some say or at least an opinion.

Both Harbaugh and Shanahan teams cant finish in big games. Not sure what ownership could have done for a different outcome.

He was set to have get it back but Denise and the Yorks got greedy and wouldn't give it back and Eddie D didn'tl want to start a family feud and go through the legal battle.

I'll try and find a source, but I thought I remembered hearing that the NFL was reluctant to approve Eddie's return at the time, due to Eddie's dirty dealings.

Originally posted by GorefullBore:

Originally posted by Young2Rice:

Originally posted by Niners99:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Was there a CHANGE in OWNERSHIP between 5 - 0 and 0 - 3 in the Super Bowl?

I mean, Eddie is the one who screwed up and lost the team. It stayed in the family, where he presumably still has some say or at least an opinion.

Both Harbaugh and Shanahan teams cant finish in big games. Not sure what ownership could have done for a different outcome.

He was set to have get it back but Denise and the Yorks got greedy and wouldn't give it back and Eddie D didn'tl want to start a family feud and go through the legal battle.

I'll try and find a source, but I thought I remembered hearing that the NFL was reluctant to approve Eddie's return at the time, due to Eddie's dirty dealings.

Had Bill Walsh not interfered, Seifert would have been Cleveland's HC while Jimmy Johnson would have been ours after that Super Bowl against Cincy..

Had Eddie been our owner still, Chris Petersen or PJ Fleck would have been our HC and woulda beaten KC by 13 both times.. and Shanny would have still be the best young mind in football in Atlanta...

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by GorefullBore:

Originally posted by Young2Rice:

Originally posted by Niners99:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Was there a CHANGE in OWNERSHIP between 5 - 0 and 0 - 3 in the Super Bowl?

I mean, Eddie is the one who screwed up and lost the team. It stayed in the family, where he presumably still has some say or at least an opinion.

Both Harbaugh and Shanahan teams cant finish in big games. Not sure what ownership could have done for a different outcome.

He was set to have get it back but Denise and the Yorks got greedy and wouldn't give it back and Eddie D didn'tl want to start a family feud and go through the legal battle.

I'll try and find a source, but I thought I remembered hearing that the NFL was reluctant to approve Eddie's return at the time, due to Eddie's dirty dealings.

Had Bill Walsh not interfered, Seifert would have been Cleveland's HC while Jimmy Johnson would have been ours after that Super Bowl against Cincy..

Had Eddie been our owner still, Chris Petersen or PJ Fleck would have been our HC and woulda beaten KC by 13 both times.. and Shanny would have still be the best young mind in football in Atlanta...

Would have, could have, should have. Get over it.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by linkboy:

(this is an image I made, nothing official).

I'd like to see something like this. It's the current logo with the gold ring removed. I prefer how the S layers over the F instead of cutting through it.

nice. me personally i would lose the black and lose the red and lose the ovals

I never saw a logo make a TD or a tackle.

even the red color is better in the old version

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
even the red color is better in the old version

Somehow need to incorporate that crazy prospector logo from years past on more current team gear. Probably wouldn't be allowed by today's NFL - might be considered "too violent."

Originally posted by LottDMontanaO:

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
even the red color is better in the old version

Somehow need to incorporate that crazy prospector logo from years past on more current team gear. Probably wouldn't be allowed by today's NFL - might be considered "too violent."

Endzone or 50 yard logo

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
even the red color is better in the old version

The classic pre-1996 logo always looks it has like a brighter shade of red, especially on the helmet decals, even though the 1968-95 and 2009-present logos' shades of red are supposedly the same…weird how that trim of a gold ring creates the illusion of darkening the red in the current logo (along with the connotation it's a darker cardinal red through association with the 1996-2008 logo).

TL;DR just go back to the dynasty logo (1981-1995) permanently and save the equipment guys the extra work of switching out those decals for throwback games.