Originally posted by MrGriz:
It's like they're playing the game with a plan to troll the F out of the webzone hahahahahahahahaha
Yes that's the only explanation I can find lol.
There are 349 users in the forums
Originally posted by MrGriz:
It's like they're playing the game with a plan to troll the F out of the webzone hahahahahahahahaha
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
The guy who has thrown less than 600 passes his entire life. Why do you have self-esteem?
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Looking forward to a more in depth analysis which will show that abysmal pass protection can affect a QB, especially one learning on the fly.
Who is learning on the fly?
The guy who has thrown less than 600 passes his entire life. Why do you have self-esteem?
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by OnTheClock:
Reporters claimed:
-Lance was much improved and doing better than Sam
-Moody was hardly missing anything
-Kinlaw was finally better
-Mason was catching the ball better
-Womack has been good in coverage all camp
I haven't seen a single thing in this game so far to support any of this. Tf were they watching?
The problem is that you have to trust people with little to no actual football background and varying agendas to deliver that information.
And some of it may very well have been the honest truth, like Moody not missing kicks and hitting it from deep but it is pretty disconcerting that he whiffed on his first in-game opportunity.
Originally posted by scooterp10:
He'll look good when he's playing somewhere else for a coach that cares about his development. Dude is still younger than some of the rookie QBs. He's younger then O'Connell. 😆
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
If this were practice, beat writers would rush to twitter to post:
Trey Lance 10/15, 1 TD
with nothing else and everyone would think it was a good day for him.
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Looking forward to a more in depth analysis which will show that abysmal pass protection can affect a QB, especially one learning on the fly.
Who is learning on the fly?
The guy who has thrown less than 600 passes his entire life. Why do you have self-esteem?
Originally posted by Montana:You have shade and still complain about the heat… lol Levi joke
First half mood: meh & moody blues also, someone turn the damn AC on in this stadium, holy chit it's hot AF. We gotta regroup at halftime
Originally posted by jreff22:
It's year 3, this isn't on the fly lol
Originally posted by OnTheClock:
Reporters claimed:
-Lance was much improved and doing better than Sam
-Moody was hardly missing anything
-Kinlaw was finally better
-Mason was catching the ball better
-Womack has been good in coverage all camp
I haven't seen a single thing in this game so far to support any of this. Tf were they watching?
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:Originally posted by OnTheClock:Reporters claimed:
-Lance was much improved and doing better than Sam
-Moody was hardly missing anything
-Kinlaw was finally better
-Mason was catching the ball better
-Womack has been good in coverage all camp
I haven't seen a single thing in this game so far to support any of this. Tf were they watching?
The problem is that you have to trust people with little to no actual football background and varying agendas to deliver that information.
And some of it may very well have been the honest truth, like Moody not missing kicks and hitting it from deep but it is pretty disconcerting that he whiffed on his first in-game opportunity.
Originally posted by HONEYBADGER:
Can everyone give up on the Trey Lance experiment now....I think its over.
Originally posted by OnTheClock:
Reporters claimed:
-Lance was much improved and doing better than Sam
-Moody was hardly missing anything
-Kinlaw was finally better
-Mason was catching the ball better
-Womack has been good in coverage all camp
I haven't seen a single thing in this game so far to support any of this. Tf were they watching?