Originally posted by Chance:
Originally posted by Rockchalk_Seahawk:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by Rockchalk_Seahawk:
Drew Lock leads the league in passer rating but Purdy is number 2 right behind Lock. He's had a great 2 games and the future is bright if you're a Niner fan.
And Purdy doesn't have JSN doing all that heavy lifting. You all better pray JSN doesn't get injured cuz your offense runs(or passes) through him.
That's a good point but he does have Evans and Kittle
We aren't comparing Purdy to Lock, because it's stupid. If you were really a believer in passer rating, you'd know that Purdy has the highest all-time passer rating in NFL history, recognized in about 100 more passing attempts. But unless you're prepared to argue that Purdy is the greatest QB in NFL history, I think we can put this dumb post of yours to bed.
Passer rating is a poor measurement of how effective a QB is. It's a formula that uses completion percentage, yards, TDs and INTs. I see guys with huge ratings every week that are far less effective than players with lower ratings. INTs can have an oversize effet on passer rting even if the INT isn't costly. An INT can happen because of a tipped pass after a missed block or ball that goes off the WR's hands. Not the QB's fault but he gets dinged big time for it.
The problem is passer ratings are a based on stats without any context. It doesn't take into consideration things like available receivers, the strength of the team they're facing, game circumstances, weather, coaching, pass protection, etc. A QB can have a high passer rating without having a big effect on the game outcome. He can also have a low rating and still come up big in crunch time.
That doesn't mean a QB with a high rating isnt good. You can have a high rating and have a big effect on the game like Brock did last week but it's just one stat among many. It's not the most important one. QBR is a little better because it includes more factors but even that doesn't tell the whole story.