Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 309 users in the forums

QB Brock Purdy Thread

Shop Find 49ers gear online

QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by Chance:
I don't know how anyone who has watched the entirety of Purdy's young career who does not see him as a fringe elite QB already. His second year, he was an MVP candidate for crying out loud. Yes, last year was a step backwards, but not so much so that we just delete from our memory the 28 or so games of consistently great play that preceded it. I get a cautiously optimistic approach, and support those that maintain a level of wait-and-see as he navigates the ups and downs of an early NFL career. But what I don't accept, is the people who flat out deny that Purdy has put more great play on the tape than he has good play, and far more good play than he has poor play. His numbers back that up, and portray a start to a career that rivals some pretty elite QBs. Sure, a lot of that is on an offense that has playmakers, and a coach that can help a QB reach maximum potential, but what the tape also shows to anyone who's watched it, is a guy who pushes the ball downfield and makes big time plays, reads defenses lightning fast, rifles through progressions, maneuvers with agility, sees guys open, and delivers balls accurately in tight windows.

There's still a lot of work to do, and a looming questions of whether he's just a flash in the pan, or that his early magic can reappear and remain the norm. But, I for one have never been ready to label him as some middle of the road QB when he's put far more elite tape out there than any other QB that's played as long or less than he has. I still see something special in him. Like, in 15 years if he had a career that rivaled Drew Brees', I would not be shocked in the least. I'd honestly be more shocked if he turned into a pumpkin and became the middling QB too many of you see him as.

💯
  • Furlow
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 25,416
If Purdy had played all 14 games his projected stats and rankings would be:

TD passes 28 (3rd)
Passing yards 3,360 (7th)
YPA 7.6 (9th)
Completion 67.9% (7th)
TD% 6.3% (4th)
Success rate 55.1 (2nd)
QB rating 96.0 (12th)
QBR 72.9 (2nd)

Only bad one is he'd also lead the league in INT's with 16 😬
  • irief
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 623
Originally posted by Furlow:
If Purdy had played all 14 games his projected stats and rankings would be:

TD passes 28 (3rd)
Passing yards 3,360 (7th)
YPA 7.6 (9th)
Completion 67.9% (7th)
TD% 6.3% (4th)
Success rate 55.1 (2nd)
QB rating 96.0 (12th)
QBR 72.9 (2nd)

Only bad one is he'd also lead the league in INT's with 16 😬

Not very good considering Stafford's at 37td and 5 ints.
You trade two firsts in a heartbeat for Burrow, although Cincy would be crazy to do that. He's a top three truly elite QB. None of this fringe elite BS, or very good for a 7th rd pick. Scary the new heights Shanahan could take Burrow, considering what he's done with far less talent.
Originally posted by Chance:
I don't know how anyone who has watched the entirety of Purdy's young career who does not see him as a fringe elite QB already. His second year, he was an MVP candidate for crying out loud. Yes, last year was a step backwards, but not so much so that we just delete from our memory the 28 or so games of consistently great play that preceded it. I get a cautiously optimistic approach, and support those that maintain a level of wait-and-see as he navigates the ups and downs of an early NFL career. But what I don't accept, is the people who flat out deny that Purdy has put more great play on the tape than he has good play, and far more good play than he has poor play. His numbers back that up, and portray a start to a career that rivals some pretty elite QBs. Sure, a lot of that is on an offense that has playmakers, and a coach that can help a QB reach maximum potential, but what the tape also shows to anyone who's watched it, is a guy who pushes the ball downfield and makes big time plays, reads defenses lightning fast, rifles through progressions, maneuvers with agility, sees guys open, and delivers balls accurately in tight windows.

There's still a lot of work to do, and a looming questions of whether he's just a flash in the pan, or that his early magic can reappear and remain the norm. But, I for one have never been ready to label him as some middle of the road QB when he's put far more elite tape out there than any other QB that's played as long or less than he has. I still see something special in him. Like, in 15 years if he had a career that rivaled Drew Brees', I would not be shocked in the least. I'd honestly be more shocked if he turned into a pumpkin and became the middling QB too many of you see him as.

let'sss goo

Hmmm
Originally posted by ninersrule4:
The fact this is the only place where people think Purdy is better than Burrow is all you need to know lol. It's closed eyed fandom and nothing more.

Means nothing. When you follow the crowd you end up with Trubisky over Mahomes. You draft Trey Lance in the 1st round. You draft Brock Purdy last

Half of our own fanbase can't get past him being the last pick, so how do you expect other fans to see past it? The draft shows just how little everybody truly knows, so be careful going with what everybody thinks
This board is funny. Half the posters claiming Purdy is better than Mahomes, Burrow, Allen and Lamar, while the other half say he is not.

27 other teams don't have a Mahomes, Burrow, Allen or Lamar. It's okay that we don't. Doesn't mean that we have to pretend Purdy is one of those guys or that he is not a good quarterback just because he isn't.

It's pointless lol.
Originally posted by niner4life21:
This board is funny. Half the posters claiming Purdy is better than Mahomes, Burrow, Allen and Lamar, while the other half say he is not.

27 other teams don't have a Mahomes, Burrow, Allen or Lamar. It's okay that we don't. Doesn't mean that we have to pretend Purdy is one of those guys or that he is not a good quarterback just because he isn't.

It's pointless lol.

The only thing that's funny about this forum are the posters who make up fake positions to argue against. Literally no one has claimed Purdy is better than those guys.
Originally posted by irief:
Originally posted by Furlow:
If Purdy had played all 14 games his projected stats and rankings would be:

TD passes 28 (3rd)
Passing yards 3,360 (7th)
YPA 7.6 (9th)
Completion 67.9% (7th)
TD% 6.3% (4th)
Success rate 55.1 (2nd)
QB rating 96.0 (12th)
QBR 72.9 (2nd)

Only bad one is he'd also lead the league in INT's with 16 😬

Not very good considering Stafford's at 37td and 5 ints.

Woo?
Originally posted by Chance:
Originally posted by niner4life21:
This board is funny. Half the posters claiming Purdy is better than Mahomes, Burrow, Allen and Lamar, while the other half say he is not.

27 other teams don't have a Mahomes, Burrow, Allen or Lamar. It's okay that we don't. Doesn't mean that we have to pretend Purdy is one of those guys or that he is not a good quarterback just because he isn't.

It's pointless lol.

The only thing that's funny about this forum are the posters who make up fake positions to argue against. Literally no one has claimed Purdy is better than those guys.

Multiple posters over the last few years have said they would pick Purdy over those guys, or that they are equal. Are the last few pages of this thread not a discussion about whether Burrow is actually better than Brock, or if he is really that much better than Brock? Weren't there people mocking Burrow's last performance in an attempt to prop up Brock?

Do you need people to outright say "Purdy is better or equal," or are you maybe able to read between the lines? See below quote from a few pages ago.

I know winning isn't really a QB stat but when it comes down to it, guys like Burrow, Allen and Jackson haven't achieved much more on field success than Brock.
Originally posted by Chance:
Originally posted by niner4life21:
This board is funny. Half the posters claiming Purdy is better than Mahomes, Burrow, Allen and Lamar, while the other half say he is not.

27 other teams don't have a Mahomes, Burrow, Allen or Lamar. It's okay that we don't. Doesn't mean that we have to pretend Purdy is one of those guys or that he is not a good quarterback just because he isn't.

It's pointless lol.

The only thing that's funny about this forum are the posters who make up fake positions to argue against. Literally no one has claimed Purdy is better than those guys.

Originally posted by q0c0p:
Remind me of how burrow did guys ????. How silly people actually wanted us to get him. Brock is the best qb for us and kyle. Plz stop talking crap about brocky now

Were you really not aware of posts like the one above, or just speaking in hyperbole to dismiss my take on this debate?
Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Hmmm

Mmhmm

"I'm not having fun." Burrows sounding like an entitled snowflake. I'll stick with BP--close enough skills, way better mindset.
Originally posted by niner4life21:
This board is funny. Half the posters claiming Purdy is better than Mahomes, Burrow, Allen and Lamar, while the other half say he is not.

27 other teams don't have a Mahomes, Burrow, Allen or Lamar. It's okay that we don't. Doesn't mean that we have to pretend Purdy is one of those guys or that he is not a good quarterback just because he isn't.

It's pointless lol.

I can't say no posters ever claimed that, but it is a very few. There is no way remotely close to half of the posters made such claims. You are funny.
[ Edited by libertyforever on Dec 17, 2025 at 5:50 PM ]
Originally posted by pillageDatazz:
Mmhmm


where are all of the but...but...but...he's surrounded by a super team people at now?
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone