QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by ninerjok:
I liked what Brad Graham was saying about any perceived or media manufactured controversy. He was basically saying he doesn't give a rip about whether people think it's a QB controversy, etc. He likes both QBs and roots for both to succeed. We have 2 QBs capable of leading the team and playing well. He doesn't care who's starting if they both get the job done or if it takes both to get in the playoffs. Thus, no controversy.

Originally posted by TD49ers:

Originally posted by Chance:

Originally posted by TD49ers:

Originally posted by Chance:

Originally posted by irief:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by irief:

Originally posted by genus49:
Excuses aren't needed when you win...unless you're Brock Purdy apparently cuz we still have people bringing up his picks and the "near pick" aka game winning TD.

Thing after a loss people struggle with having nuanced conversations, it's hot take city. We had a guy in here legit claim Purdy's game vs the Jags was the worst game he's seen from a QB in a 49ers uniform.

Nobody was worried about Mac's fumble vs the Saints cuz we won. Nobody was worried about Mac's pick vs Arizona cuz we won.

So let's be honest - Brock has a bigger target on him because he's the actual starter and now a guy we signed to a big contract but why should that impact the actual analysis?

We'll never have apples to apples comparison at the very least until we see Mac play vs Seattle or Brock play vs the Rams this season. And even then obviously and hopefully the talent around them will be different in those games so we'll never have a clear this guy did this and this guy did that.

The mistakes Brock made in Seattle weren't the mistakes he made vs the Jags. That's why I think just looking at his 4 TD vs 4 INT stat line isn't telling of what actually happened.

But hopefully Mac continues to play well cuz we need him to keep winning. I just expect Brock to be much better than meh when he comes back.

Damn! Took all of that for you to finally admit Brock's been meh?

Looked like math was tough earlier, now we're struggling with reading? Maybe just let AI read for you if you're unable to follow the conversation.

What part of the math or reading are you struggling with? 24/16=1.5 which isn't good. You want that around 4 or higher for high level qb play. Not so hard if you remember fractions from elementary school.

TIL Brett Favre and his 1.51 career td/int ratio didn't play the position at a high level.

Huh?

What are you having trouble understanding?

Your point of view.

Originally posted by irief:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by irief:

Originally posted by genus49:
Excuses aren't needed when you win...unless you're Brock Purdy apparently cuz we still have people bringing up his picks and the "near pick" aka game winning TD.

Thing after a loss people struggle with having nuanced conversations, it's hot take city. We had a guy in here legit claim Purdy's game vs the Jags was the worst game he's seen from a QB in a 49ers uniform.

Nobody was worried about Mac's fumble vs the Saints cuz we won. Nobody was worried about Mac's pick vs Arizona cuz we won.

So let's be honest - Brock has a bigger target on him because he's the actual starter and now a guy we signed to a big contract but why should that impact the actual analysis?

We'll never have apples to apples comparison at the very least until we see Mac play vs Seattle or Brock play vs the Rams this season. And even then obviously and hopefully the talent around them will be different in those games so we'll never have a clear this guy did this and this guy did that.

The mistakes Brock made in Seattle weren't the mistakes he made vs the Jags. That's why I think just looking at his 4 TD vs 4 INT stat line isn't telling of what actually happened.

But hopefully Mac continues to play well cuz we need him to keep winning. I just expect Brock to be much better than meh when he comes back.

Damn! Took all of that for you to finally admit Brock's been meh?

Looked like math was tough earlier, now we're struggling with reading? Maybe just let AI read for you if you're unable to follow the conversation.

What part of the math or reading are you struggling with? 24/16=1.5 which isn't good. You want that around 4 or higher for high level qb play. Not so hard if you remember fractions from elementary school.

Lots of football left but if Mac continues to play well and Brock comes back and is meh

I just expect Brock to be much better than meh when he comes back

Originally posted by Chance:

Originally posted by TD49ers:

Originally posted by Chance:

Originally posted by TD49ers:

Originally posted by Chance:

Originally posted by irief:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by irief:

Originally posted by genus49:
Excuses aren't needed when you win...unless you're Brock Purdy apparently cuz we still have people bringing up his picks and the "near pick" aka game winning TD.

Thing after a loss people struggle with having nuanced conversations, it's hot take city. We had a guy in here legit claim Purdy's game vs the Jags was the worst game he's seen from a QB in a 49ers uniform.

Nobody was worried about Mac's fumble vs the Saints cuz we won. Nobody was worried about Mac's pick vs Arizona cuz we won.

So let's be honest - Brock has a bigger target on him because he's the actual starter and now a guy we signed to a big contract but why should that impact the actual analysis?

We'll never have apples to apples comparison at the very least until we see Mac play vs Seattle or Brock play vs the Rams this season. And even then obviously and hopefully the talent around them will be different in those games so we'll never have a clear this guy did this and this guy did that.

The mistakes Brock made in Seattle weren't the mistakes he made vs the Jags. That's why I think just looking at his 4 TD vs 4 INT stat line isn't telling of what actually happened.

But hopefully Mac continues to play well cuz we need him to keep winning. I just expect Brock to be much better than meh when he comes back.

Damn! Took all of that for you to finally admit Brock's been meh?

Looked like math was tough earlier, now we're struggling with reading? Maybe just let AI read for you if you're unable to follow the conversation.

What part of the math or reading are you struggling with? 24/16=1.5 which isn't good. You want that around 4 or higher for high level qb play. Not so hard if you remember fractions from elementary school.

TIL Brett Favre and his 1.51 career td/int ratio didn't play the position at a high level.

Huh?

What are you having trouble understanding?

Your point of view.

You can lead a horse to water...

Originally posted by Seattle49er:
Dude has turf toe, you know the same thing that ended Patrick Willis's career. I'm all for having him take the time to heal. Judging him after 2 games is moronic. You sound like a Seahawk fan.

Originally posted by Montana:

Originally posted by Seattle49er:
Dude has turf toe, you know the same thing that ended Patrick Willis's career. I'm all for having him take the time to heal. Judging him after 2 games is moronic. You sound like a Seahawk fan.

This!

Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Willis had a more severe toe issue but that doesn't mean Purdy's can't get worse. If it becomes a chronic thing like Willis where it never eally heals then his career could be cut short.

Originally posted by genus49:
Looked like math was tough earlier, now we're struggling with reading? Maybe just let AI read for you if you're unable to follow the conversation.

Originally posted by TD49ers:

Originally posted by genus49:
Looked like math was tough earlier, now we're struggling with reading? Maybe just let AI read for you if you're unable to follow the conversation.

Hmmmmm.....is this ok?

Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:

Originally posted by TD49ers:

Originally posted by genus49:
Looked like math was tough earlier, now we're struggling with reading? Maybe just let AI read for you if you're unable to follow the conversation.

Hmmmmm.....is this ok?

Snowflake doesn't like getting called and now acting like a Karen

Originally posted by genus49:
No need for personal insults but I would expect when people are having a conversation that if you're not just here to stir things up and instigate that you should be able to follow a conversation or at least validate the stuff you post.

TD you can bring up that post however times you want it won't change that I was responding to his posts where he couldn't do simple math or read the posts he was trying to play gotcha on.

We can get back to discussing Purdy whenever you guys want now.

Originally posted by Montana:

Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Willis had a more severe toe issue but that doesn't mean Purdy's can't get worse. If it becomes a chronic thing like Willis where it never eally heals then his career could be cut short.

Exactly. This is common sense. Rest him up as long as he needs, we have a fantastic backup. This is best we could ask for given the situation.

I don't know why ppl seem to disregard this injury like it's nothing to be too concerned about and that it really shouldn't affect his play. It's ridiculous.