There are 380 users in the forums

QB Brock Purdy Thread

Shop Find 49ers gear online

QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by eastie:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by braap49er:

fight!!

brock is overpaid, that's just the reality. on the rook deal you are typically underpaid, in brock's case historically underpaid. then you get your 2nd contract, and that's when guys get overpaid. dude signed a $265m deal, you think he cares about anything someone says that isn't on this team

LOL at "Brock is overpaid" Clown post.

guy signs over a quarter of a billion dollars, you don't think that's overpaid? guy had 1 great full season.
Using TJ's rational Josh Allen is also overpaid as he cannot even get to the Super Bowl. Yet he considers Joe Burrow a top 5 Qb. Exactly what has he done
Originally posted by leakyfausett:
Using TJ's rational Josh Allen is also overpaid as he cannot even get to the Super Bowl. Yet he considers Joe Burrow a top 5 Qb. Exactly what has he done

He's been after Brock ever since Aiyuk got shutdown in the SB. That really set him off and he's trashed Brock ever since. Reminds me of Trey fans the way he takes his boys shortcomings out on Brock

[ Edited by CharlieSheen on May 27, 2025 at 3:22 PM ]
Originally posted by leakyfausett:
Using TJ's rational Josh Allen is also overpaid as he cannot even get to the Super Bowl. Yet he considers Joe Burrow a top 5 Qb. Exactly what has he done

it depends on if you are asking what has he done as an individual player, or if you're asking what has his team accomplished.

i view that as distinct, not one and the same. purdy's hero was marino, who famously had maybe the best season of all time, but didn't have the team success of the ring. most ppl agree he's a heck of a QB, ring or not.

ppl are maybe looking for slights, where none exist. lot of ppl on here said hurts sucks or was overpaid, now he has the ring, and SB MVP. so you hear it less. but tbh, you still hear it, even with the ring. so ppl think whatever they want at the end of the day. i think TJ is saying ok if brock wants to show he's worth it, he needs to win some real hardware. that's probably true. but i think he can only control his own play, maybe some of the O around him. he can't control the D and ST and other stuff you need to win as a team. so in that sense, it's not fair to say he has to win a ring, as if he can just do that solo. marino showed he was an all time great, with no ring.
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
brock is overpaid, that's just the reality. on the rook deal you are typically underpaid, in brock's case historically underpaid. then you get your 2nd contract, and that's when guys get overpaid. dude signed a $265m deal, you think he cares about anything someone says that isn't on this team

the thing is, he's not necessarily being paid that $265M tho....



There's $157M of that deal (in cap space) right there to get out of if he's not living up to the contract. The $55M or so this deal may eat in cap space is probably at least a good $30M better than the need to tag him twice if he's playing well.

We have a world of wiggle room and so I don't agree with putting $265M plus on his back right now then claiming he's not worth it.

We felt he's worth a good $100M+ over the next 3 years and we'll make some decisions down the road.
  • okdkid
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 23,653
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
guy signs over a quarter of a billion dollars, you don't think that's overpaid? guy had 1 great full season.

For a plumber? Yeah.

For a top NFL QB? No. Might be underpaid.
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
brock is overpaid, that's just the reality. on the rook deal you are typically underpaid, in brock's case historically underpaid. then you get your 2nd contract, and that's when guys get overpaid. dude signed a $265m deal, you think he cares about anything someone says that isn't on this team

the thing is, he's not necessarily being paid that $265M tho....



There's $157M of that deal (in cap space) right there to get out of if he's not living up to the contract. The $55M or so this deal may eat in cap space is probably at least a good $30M better than the need to tag him twice if he's playing well.

We have a world of wiggle room and so I don't agree with putting $265M plus on his back right now then claiming he's not worth it.

We felt he's worth a good $100M+ over the next 3 years and we'll make some decisions down the road.

yeah it's a fair deal cap hit wise from the club perspective. i was speaking more on the general idea that on the rook deal, you get underpaid, and on the 2nd deal, should you play well on the first, you get overpaid or paid very handsomely. i think he's getting 9 figures fully gtd on this deal.
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
guy signs over a quarter of a billion dollars, you don't think that's overpaid? guy had 1 great full season.

For a plumber? Yeah.

For a top NFL QB? No. Might be underpaid.

he's not a top QB tho. the guys who criticized simms for saying he's not top 10, then rattled off ten names, and not brock. he's a mid QB1. probably in the 10-20 range. top is mahomes, allen, lamar and the guys winning league mvp. nothing wrong with not being #1 at your position. most guys aren't. jennings isn't the top WR, he's still a heck of a player and a dawg. brock is the same.
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
it depends on if you are asking what has he done as an individual player, or if you're asking what has his team accomplished.

i view that as distinct, not one and the same. purdy's hero was marino, who famously had maybe the best season of all time, but didn't have the team success of the ring. most ppl agree he's a heck of a QB, ring or not.

ppl are maybe looking for slights, where none exist. lot of ppl on here said hurts sucks or was overpaid, now he has the ring, and SB MVP. so you hear it less. but tbh, you still hear it, even with the ring. so ppl think whatever they want at the end of the day. i think TJ is saying ok if brock wants to show he's worth it, he needs to win some real hardware. that's probably true. but i think he can only control his own play, maybe some of the O around him. he can't control the D and ST and other stuff you need to win as a team. so in that sense, it's not fair to say he has to win a ring, as if he can just do that solo. marino showed he was an all time great, with no ring.

This ties directly in to the first part of your post: separating a player's individual ability, or even accomplishment, with team accomplishment.

People who are critical of Hurts are being critical of him as an individual player, and I think that's the bulk of what you see with criticism with Brock. It's about his individual worth and/or ability.

When someone like TJH says he wants to see Brock win a ring in order to justify his contract, it's easy for people to assume he's judging the player by team accomplishments a lot of which are out of his control. But I think in the full context of things that have happened with our team over the last 2-3 seasons, it's a sensical point probably worded poorly. For us to win a ring with our team as currently constructed, it will probably involve a much larger contribution from Brock than what was required 2-3 seasons ago. I think the argument from 'detractors' mainly stems from doubt he'll he able to do that.

This to me is why it's nonsensical to compare TJ's comments about Brock to players who also haven't won, but are paid, like Allen and Lamar. We've seen both of these guys be the clear cut best players on their teams for years… the biggest reasons those teams contend… and we haven't seen that from Brock.
[ Edited by SmokeyJoe on May 27, 2025 at 4:04 PM ]
  • okdkid
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 23,653
I will say the good thing about these anti Purdy arguments is they are just getting worse and worse. They are so easy to defeat.

They are ALWAYS based in:

1) complete hypotheticals
2) criteria for judgement that only apply to Purdy
3) poor sample size to illustrate a broader point

Most of all - they are just intellectually dishonest. There is no real effort to critique him. It's vibe scouting. "I don't care what the tape, stats, players, results or contract says. He sucks."
  • okdkid
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 23,653
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
guy signs over a quarter of a billion dollars, you don't think that's overpaid? guy had 1 great full season.

For a plumber? Yeah.

For a top NFL QB? No. Might be underpaid.

he's not a top QB tho. the guys who criticized simms for saying he's not top 10, then rattled off ten names, and not brock. he's a mid QB1. probably in the 10-20 range. top is mahomes, allen, lamar and the guys winning league mvp. nothing wrong with not being #1 at your position. most guys aren't. jennings isn't the top WR, he's still a heck of a player and a dawg. brock is the same.

His worst year was a QBR of #7 on the league lol
Originally posted by okdkid:
I will say the good thing about these anti Purdy arguments is they are just getting worse and worse. They are so easy to defeat.

They are ALWAYS based in:

1) complete hypotheticals
2) criteria for judgement that only apply to Purdy
3) poor sample size to illustrate a broader point

Most of all - they are just intellectually dishonest. There is no real effort to critique him. It's vibe scouting. "I don't care what the tape, stats, players, results or contract says. He sucks."

i don't see anyone saying he sucks. it's a debate between is he the best or as good as the best like mahomes, or is he in the next tier or so down the list.
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
guy signs over a quarter of a billion dollars, you don't think that's overpaid? guy had 1 great full season.

For a plumber? Yeah.

For a top NFL QB? No. Might be underpaid.

he's not a top QB tho. the guys who criticized simms for saying he's not top 10, then rattled off ten names, and not brock. he's a mid QB1. probably in the 10-20 range. top is mahomes, allen, lamar and the guys winning league mvp. nothing wrong with not being #1 at your position. most guys aren't. jennings isn't the top WR, he's still a heck of a player and a dawg. brock is the same.

His worst year was a QBR of #7 on the league lol

And his only other year he was an MVP runner up.

If T-Law had this kind of success, he'd be talked about as a top 5 QB, guaran-f**king-teed.

I can take hacks in the media taking shots at Purdy. They likely don't watch him play other than in highlights. But our own fans? Who presumably watch his every dropback, at that point, you just have a f**king axe to grind.
Originally posted by Chance:
And his only other year he was an MVP runner up.

If T-Law had this kind of success, he'd be talked about as a top 5 QB, guaran-f**king-teed.

I can take hacks in the media taking shots at Purdy. They likely don't watch him play other than in highlights. But our own fans? Who presumably watch his every dropback, at that point, you just have a f**king axe to grind.

i just don't get this line of thinking. do our own fans need to think moody is #1 at kicking? or jennings better than justin jefferson? why do we evaluate those guys as not best at their position, and brock has to be #1? ppl get emotional on QB, and they tend to see other positions for what they are.
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by okdkid:
I will say the good thing about these anti Purdy arguments is they are just getting worse and worse. They are so easy to defeat.

They are ALWAYS based in:

1) complete hypotheticals
2) criteria for judgement that only apply to Purdy
3) poor sample size to illustrate a broader point

Most of all - they are just intellectually dishonest. There is no real effort to critique him. It's vibe scouting. "I don't care what the tape, stats, players, results or contract says. He sucks."

i don't see anyone saying he sucks. it's a debate between is he the best or as good as the best like mahomes, or is he in the next tier or so down the list.

No one is saying he is Mahomes. You're creating a strawman. You're saying he's overpaid, overrated, and somewhere in the top 20. That's pretty f**king disrespectful for a QB that has had better numbers than Mahomes since 2022, when Brock first started playing pro football. Is there a QB in the 15-20 range that better stats than the best QB in the game over the last two and a half seasons, or is it just Brock Purdy?
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone